by Spargo » Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:06 am
by PanthersFan » Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:12 am
Spargo wrote:DOC wrote:MAL.
This from yesterdays paper.
A CONTROVERSIAL umpiring decision in the final minute cost South Adelaide a miraculous draw against premier Glenelg at Adelaide Oval on Sunday.
After producing a scintillating and brave comeback from 45 points behind at three-quarter-time to draw within six points, Panthers small forward Eamon Wilkinson was awarded a free kick for a push in the back by Tiger Michael Virgin in a marking contest on the edge of the goalsquare.
But unaware the free kick had been paid, Wilkinson then toe-poked the ball across the goal-line for a behind.
Rather than hand the ball back to Wilkinson, who would almost certainly have kicked the goal to tie the scores and complete South’s remarkable comeback, the field umpire called advantage play on, the behind stood and the stunned Tigers held on to win by five points, 15.7 (97) to 14.8 (92).
It was Glenelg’s second consecutive win by less than a goal to start the season after it beat Norwood by three points in Round 1.
Panthers coach Jarrad Wright blasted the decision to rob Wilkinson of a possible game-tying shot at goal, saying “he should have been given the free kick and a set shot’’.
“There was no advantage in that decision at all,’’ Wright said. “There was crowd noise, it was in the heat of the play and the ball goes through for a behind, there was no advantage play on whatsoever.
“It was a scrimmage, it wasn’t like someone grabbed the ball, played on and took two bounces before having a shot at goal. It should have been called back and been a set shot at goal, so it was disappointing for the game to end that way.’’
Wright said Wilkinson had told him he didn’t know he had been awarded the free when he soccered the ball through. The controversial end came after Glenelg – inspired by last year’s Magarey Medallist Luke Partington dominating with 34 disposals and three goals – powered to a 45-point lead at the final change.
With Jack Oatey Medallist Matthew Snook (29 disposals) and fellow midfielder Marlon Motlop (25 and two goals) also starring, the Tigers looked to be making a statement they were the team to beat again this year. But the gritty Panthers came storming back. They kicked seven goals to one in the final stanza to draw to within six points 26 minutes into the term before the gamedeciding Wilkinson decision.
Glenelg captain Max Proud, playing his 100th game, said his team was relieved to get the points but the late collapse had left the players feeling “very empty’’.
“We played really well for three quarters and probably should have put the foot on the throat but we went away from doing the things we are good at and nearly paid a big price,’’ he said. “It certainly gives us plenty to work on.’’
Convenient to focus on the last free kick & not the bewildering decisions/non decisions that helped South get back in the game.
by blueandwhite » Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:39 am
by am Bays » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:15 pm
by goddy11 » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:23 pm
DOC wrote:Spargo wrote:DOC wrote:MAL.
This from yesterdays paper.
A CONTROVERSIAL umpiring decision in the final minute cost South Adelaide a miraculous draw against premier Glenelg at Adelaide Oval on Sunday.
After producing a scintillating and brave comeback from 45 points behind at three-quarter-time to draw within six points, Panthers small forward Eamon Wilkinson was awarded a free kick for a push in the back by Tiger Michael Virgin in a marking contest on the edge of the goalsquare.
But unaware the free kick had been paid, Wilkinson then toe-poked the ball across the goal-line for a behind.
Rather than hand the ball back to Wilkinson, who would almost certainly have kicked the goal to tie the scores and complete South’s remarkable comeback, the field umpire called advantage play on, the behind stood and the stunned Tigers held on to win by five points, 15.7 (97) to 14.8 (92).
It was Glenelg’s second consecutive win by less than a goal to start the season after it beat Norwood by three points in Round 1.
Panthers coach Jarrad Wright blasted the decision to rob Wilkinson of a possible game-tying shot at goal, saying “he should have been given the free kick and a set shot’’.
“There was no advantage in that decision at all,’’ Wright said. “There was crowd noise, it was in the heat of the play and the ball goes through for a behind, there was no advantage play on whatsoever.
“It was a scrimmage, it wasn’t like someone grabbed the ball, played on and took two bounces before having a shot at goal. It should have been called back and been a set shot at goal, so it was disappointing for the game to end that way.’’
Wright said Wilkinson had told him he didn’t know he had been awarded the free when he soccered the ball through. The controversial end came after Glenelg – inspired by last year’s Magarey Medallist Luke Partington dominating with 34 disposals and three goals – powered to a 45-point lead at the final change.
With Jack Oatey Medallist Matthew Snook (29 disposals) and fellow midfielder Marlon Motlop (25 and two goals) also starring, the Tigers looked to be making a statement they were the team to beat again this year. But the gritty Panthers came storming back. They kicked seven goals to one in the final stanza to draw to within six points 26 minutes into the term before the gamedeciding Wilkinson decision.
Glenelg captain Max Proud, playing his 100th game, said his team was relieved to get the points but the late collapse had left the players feeling “very empty’’.
“We played really well for three quarters and probably should have put the foot on the throat but we went away from doing the things we are good at and nearly paid a big price,’’ he said. “It certainly gives us plenty to work on.’’
Convenient to focus on the last free kick & not the bewildering decisions/non decisions that helped South get back in the game.
WEll it was written by a very biased journo. I think he did it to rub a bit of salt in.
by PanthersFan » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:31 pm
am Bays wrote:Law 20.2 needs to be read here.
Not up to the umpire to determine if the player understands/is aware that he has a free but elects to play on to advantage.
Players determine if they want to play on to advantage after a free kick, all the umpire is required to determine is,
1. Is play continuous?
2. Is it taken from in line or behind the “Mark”
Umpire got it right, player got it wrong
South coach needs to brush up on his understanding of the Laws of footy.
Now the real question is should Australian Football change their definition of advantage to that of Rugby where the Referee signals a penalty but allows the team to play on for a period of time to determine if they can score a try but then bring it back to the spot of the infringement.
by DOC » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:34 pm
Spargo wrote:Did Milbank write it?
by Spargo » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:43 pm
DOC wrote:Spargo wrote:Did Milbank write it?
Andrew Capel
by am Bays » Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:45 pm
DOC wrote:Spargo wrote:Did Milbank write it?
Andrew Capel
by DOC » Wed Jul 08, 2020 1:04 pm
am Bays wrote:Law 20.2 needs to be read here.
Not up to the umpire to determine if the player understands/is aware that he has a free but elects to play on to advantage.
Players determine if they want to play on to advantage after a free kick, all the umpire is required to determine is,
1. Is play continuous?
2. Is it taken from in line or behind the “Mark”
Umpire got it right, player got it wrong
South coach needs to brush up on his understanding of the Laws of footy.
Now the real question is should Australian Football change their definition of advantage to that of Rugby where the Referee signals a penalty but allows the team to play on for a period of time to determine if they can score a try but then bring it back to the spot of the infringement.
by Blacky » Wed Jul 08, 2020 4:26 pm
blueandwhite wrote:Yes I cant blame "akka" wilkinson for being unaware a free had been paid..... The last time South got a free kick that close to goal David Kantilla took the kick.
by am Bays » Wed Jul 08, 2020 4:47 pm
blueandwhite wrote:The last time South got a free kick that close to goal David Kantilla took the kick.
by stampy » Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:46 pm
by JK » Thu Jul 09, 2020 2:48 pm
stampy wrote:can never be as bad a decision as that made by the goal umpire in 75gf when in the last qtr mike poulter ran the ball across the line and it was paid a goal, and yes mike admits it was over the line and thought he had effed up big time until the blind goal magot put up the two fingers
by nwdfanparade » Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:15 pm
stampy wrote:can never be as bad a decision as that made by the goal umpire in 75gf when in the last qtr mike poulter ran the ball across the line and it was paid a goal, and yes mike admits it was over the line and thought he had effed up big time until the blind goal magot put up the two fingers
by Wedgie » Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:54 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:59 pm
by Groucho » Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:36 pm
JK wrote:Im sure their reasons are valid, and the cost/loss involved might be too big to carry, but losing the Budget feels like a piece of the fabric of the competition is now missing. Nothing new I guess, but a shame nonetheless.
by Dutchy » Thu Jul 09, 2020 9:04 pm
by am Bays » Fri Jul 10, 2020 2:46 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |