by UK Fan » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:38 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by daysofourlives » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:36 am
by Booney » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:52 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:59 am
by Jim05 » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:04 am
by Booney » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:10 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:What were you saying about firing shots from the cheap seats?
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:15 am
Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:What were you saying about firing shots from the cheap seats?
The members have been asking for one for years and despite my level of compassion for them they deserve it. They buy memberships, they put their bums in their seats, they really should have somewhere to hold their knitting and cheering classes.
by Booney » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:16 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:What were you saying about firing shots from the cheap seats?
The members have been asking for one for years and despite my level of compassion for them they deserve it. They buy memberships, they put their bums in their seats, they really should have somewhere to hold their knitting and cheering classes.
You almost got through a post without a cheap shot lol.
by Dutchy » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:22 am
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:25 am
Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
by Brodlach » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:30 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Corona Man » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:39 am
by Booney » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:48 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
by David Brent » Wed Dec 11, 2019 9:52 am
Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
by Brodlach » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:02 am
Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
Firstly, some parkland development doesn't really bother me, redeveloping an already existing site really should cause no issues with anyone, even the tree huggers. I do however think the federal government pitching in $15m is a bridge too far. If Crowcorp.com.au* want to develop it, let them foot the bill.
Footnote - played cricket on one of the ovals on the southern side of the aquatic centre years and years and year ago, against Rose Park's lower grades, The ground was so dry and had cracked that badly that you would put a cricket ball in the cracks.
*For Pat pirate.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:36 am
Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
Firstly, some parkland development doesn't really bother me, redeveloping an already existing site really should cause no issues with anyone, even the tree huggers. I do however think the federal government pitching in $15m is a bridge too far. If Crowcorp.com.au* want to develop it, let them foot the bill.
Footnote - played cricket on one of the ovals on the southern side of the aquatic centre years and years and year ago, against Rose Park's lower grades, The ground was so dry and had cracked that badly that you would put a cricket ball in the cracks.
*For Pat pirate.
by Spargo » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:39 am
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
Firstly, some parkland development doesn't really bother me, redeveloping an already existing site really should cause no issues with anyone, even the tree huggers. I do however think the federal government pitching in $15m is a bridge too far. If Crowcorp.com.au* want to develop it, let them foot the bill.
Footnote - played cricket on one of the ovals on the southern side of the aquatic centre years and years and year ago, against Rose Park's lower grades, The ground was so dry and had cracked that badly that you would put a cricket ball in the cracks.
*For Pat pirate.
The Aquatic Centre needs a $15 million upgrade alone I would think
by Booney » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:44 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
Firstly, some parkland development doesn't really bother me, redeveloping an already existing site really should cause no issues with anyone, even the tree huggers. I do however think the federal government pitching in $15m is a bridge too far. If Crowcorp.com.au* want to develop it, let them foot the bill.
Footnote - played cricket on one of the ovals on the southern side of the aquatic centre years and years and year ago, against Rose Park's lower grades, The ground was so dry and had cracked that badly that you would put a cricket ball in the cracks.
*For Pat pirate.
Appreciated.
Crowcorp.com.au have presented the angle that it is for all South Australians to enjoy which is why they are getting the Government grant.
by mots02 » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:51 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:Booney wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:Dutchy wrote:Im amazed the council is considering it, it will open up the flood gates for any business to buy their way into the Parklands if it proceeds.
If a business is going to redevelop an already existing commercial site, then I don't see a problem.
Firstly, some parkland development doesn't really bother me, redeveloping an already existing site really should cause no issues with anyone, even the tree huggers. I do however think the federal government pitching in $15m is a bridge too far. If Crowcorp.com.au* want to develop it, let them foot the bill.
Footnote - played cricket on one of the ovals on the southern side of the aquatic centre years and years and year ago, against Rose Park's lower grades, The ground was so dry and had cracked that badly that you would put a cricket ball in the cracks.
*For Pat pirate.
Appreciated.
Crowcorp.com.au have presented the angle that it is for all South Australians to enjoy which is why they are getting the Government grant.
by DOC » Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:53 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |