by stan » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:07 pm
by Jim05 » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:08 pm
Spargo wrote:He got off![]()
by Spargo » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:09 pm
stan wrote:Wtf?
by Dogs64 » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:11 pm
by PatowalongaPirate » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:13 pm
by spell_check » Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:38 pm
by Alex » Thu Sep 12, 2019 12:15 am
by TDJ44 » Thu Sep 12, 2019 1:22 am
PatowalongaPirate wrote:He pleaded guilty to 2 charges of Striking in the same game and got off. But according to power fans on Twitter the SANFL are out to get them.
by Booney » Thu Sep 12, 2019 6:02 am
Booney wrote:Dogs64 wrote:cennals05 wrote:So Port are questioning the validity of the injury report because Curran played on after the hits. Have they not heard of delayed concussion? A precedent has already been set by the SANFL for this. A few years ago Presbury got suspended for a dangerous tackle on a Norwood player and missed the Preliminary final the next week. The Norwood player played out that game as well. Not sure why it should be any different for the Port players.
Plenty of precedent this year, all the talk of medical report is garbage. Round 13 Frampton got 3 downgraded to 2 (didn't appeal) other round examples Ben Davis 3 to 2, Aidyn Johnson 2 to 1 (didn't appeal), just to name a few where the players they were found guilty of hitting played on. The last round Jydon Neagle from CD got 3 to 2 for a high bump on Ladhams, he played on and played the next week. Frampton and Johnson have been reported for high contact, either they did or didn't. Frampton's other report in the game for striking was to the body and therefore got a fine (lucky he didn't get reported a third time, I think that can mean a send off).
Didn't get reported once on the day, the Match Review Panel cited him, so no can do there.
I don't expect Johnson to get off and wouldn't have appealed that one.
The Frampton one, worth appealing to play in a GF ( being the reason it's been appealed as opposed to the others you noted above ) and I think they might be successful as it was in play.
by whufc » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:20 am
by Booney » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:34 am
by JK » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:41 am
by whufc » Thu Sep 12, 2019 7:43 am
Booney wrote:The what league?
by Dogs64 » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:07 am
Dutchy wrote:
by LMA » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:23 am
Dogs64 wrote:Dutchy wrote:
In the footage it looks like he strikes him whilst in the shade of the light tower.
by Dogs64 » Thu Sep 12, 2019 8:54 am
LMA wrote:Dogs64 wrote:Dutchy wrote:
In the footage it looks like he strikes him whilst in the shade of the light tower.
I've seen those moon landing conspiracies too
by LMA » Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:03 am
by Booney » Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:03 am
by Booney » Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:04 am
LMA wrote:Port need to move on from this now and concentrate on the GF. Frampton needs to reward his good luck with a cracker of a game.
by Jim05 » Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:09 am
Booney wrote:LMA wrote:Port need to move on from this now and concentrate on the GF. Frampton needs to reward his good luck with a cracker of a game.
Agreed, he was average in the semi, needs to lift next week.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |