Cats v Pies

[JK]

"Clearly touched"

Does that FARC system show something different to what we see?

They said we will see exactly what they see.

Was the right call, ball has to be completely over the line and could clearly see some of the ball wasn't.

One correct out of one so far!

There was nothing definitive about that call at all imho

[Eagles2014]

"Clearly touched"

Does that FARC system show something different to what we see?

They said we will see exactly what they see.

Was the right call, ball has to be completely over the line and could clearly see some of the ball wasn't.

One correct out of one so far!

There was nothing definitive about that call at all imho

Have to agree to disagree then, thought clear point when first saw it. Correct decision.

Costly misses by Rohan and Hawkins here.

[Booney]

Clear because we never actually saw the moment he touched/didn't touch the ball?

[JK]

I reckon they needed a frame between the ones they had to get a certain answer. No biggy for me I have $$ on Collingwood but wouldn’t be impressed if I were a Cats fan.

[Wedgie]

They need to use a comnination of angles/cameras. I assume they did and we only saw one of them.
If they combined the angle shown with a down the ground view that showed it was clearly touched then fair enough.

PS Sad part about it is thats probably Geelongs 2nd best first quarter in a finals match in the last 7 years!

[mighty_tiger_79]

How about a few more camera angles??

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

[Booney]

How about a few more camera angles??

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

We've got 4 other angles mate.

Collingwood are on top in all of them.

[Dutchy]

I reckon they needed a frame between the ones they had to get a certain answer. No biggy for me I have $$ on Collingwood but wouldn’t be impressed if I were a Cats fan.

Umpires call was touched so they need evidence to prove it wasn't, no clear evidence = touched point

[Wedgie]

I reckon they needed a frame between the ones they had to get a certain answer. No biggy for me I have $$ on Collingwood but wouldn’t be impressed if I were a Cats fan.

Umpires call was touched so they need evidence to prove it wasn't, no clear evidence = touched point

We dont know if there was clear evidence though, thats the thing. The ARC must be seeing several angles not just the one we do. Stuff me, they have 47 screens.

[JK]

I reckon they needed a frame between the ones they had to get a certain answer. No biggy for me I have $$ on Collingwood but wouldn’t be impressed if I were a Cats fan.

Umpires call was touched so they need evidence to prove it wasn't, no clear evidence = touched point

They didn’t go with umpires call, they said clearly touched before the ball was completely over. May well have been, but couldn’t say what they said based on what we saw.

[Armchair expert]

I am about to tee off on the pre finals bye bullshit

[JK]

Cats don’t reallt look like scoring, Pies wouldn’t need much more score from here you’d think

[Wedgie]

If any political party wants to campaign for no byes in AFL they have my vote.
I'd even vote for Pauline!

[Eagles2014]

Is Ablett in the Betts category, looks like the game has passed him by?

[Wedgie]

Is Ablett in the Betts category, looks like the game has passed him by?

Nah, one mediocre quarter isn't quite one mediocre season.
The entire team has been mediocre so far to.

[Wedgie]

The good news is Geelong won't have any more byes this year.

[Eagles2014]

The good news is Geelong won't have any more byes this year.

West Coast will thrash them next week.

[helicopterking]

Only great teams overcome a 5 goal head start.

[mots02]

I am about to tee off on the pre finals bye bullshit

[Robran]

Will do a hawthorn from last year bang bang gone !!