by DOC » Tue May 07, 2019 1:12 pm
by cracka » Tue May 07, 2019 2:14 pm
by Armchair expert » Tue May 07, 2019 3:48 pm
by tipper » Tue May 07, 2019 3:54 pm
cracka wrote:Hmmm. The tolerant left. And they claim the right are the bigots
by Mr Beefy » Tue May 07, 2019 4:14 pm
She was left with egg on her face. At least she had a crack.Armchair expert wrote:She could not of stuffed that up anymore if she tried.
by Q. » Tue May 07, 2019 5:31 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:That quotes Mr Chisolm in 2013Jimmy_041 wrote:
AFR for one
Comment confounded: April 29 2019: https://www.afr.com/news/politics/natio ... 429-p51i4e
And considering politicians propensity to sue for defamation, surely Shorten couldn’t give this a pass!
by Q. » Tue May 07, 2019 5:47 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Scomo just got egged
https://www.9news.com.au/national/scott ... ial-9NewsA
I said there would be a copycat situation if the Anning egger got a pass
by DOC » Tue May 07, 2019 5:50 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 07, 2019 10:49 pm
Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:That quotes Mr Chisolm in 2013Jimmy_041 wrote:
AFR for one
Comment confounded: April 29 2019: https://www.afr.com/news/politics/natio ... 429-p51i4e
And considering politicians propensity to sue for defamation, surely Shorten couldn’t give this a pass!
That article doesn't confirm anything
by Q. » Tue May 07, 2019 11:04 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:That quotes Mr Chisolm in 2013Q. wrote:[quote="Jimmy_041"]
AFR for one
Comment confounded: April 29 2019: https://www.afr.com/news/politics/natio ... 429-p51i4e
And considering politicians propensity to sue for defamation, surely Shorten couldn’t give this a pass!
That article doesn't confirm anything
by Jimmy_041 » Tue May 07, 2019 11:59 pm
And sending someone else to do your dirty work so you have plausible deniability is just classic Shorten work.
by Q. » Wed May 08, 2019 7:46 am
by Q. » Wed May 08, 2019 8:06 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed May 08, 2019 8:44 am
Q. wrote:And your only 'source' is a crooked Palmer who just signed a preference deal with the Coalition and would have everything to gain by smearing Labor.
You reek of desperation as we head into the final throes of festering pustule of a government led by another crook who uses bullying and bluster to mask a total lack of vision and substance.
by Q. » Wed May 08, 2019 8:52 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed May 08, 2019 9:31 am
Q. wrote:We know you struggle with comprehension (see Franking Credits) but reference to 2013 is in regards to discussion of preferences.
by Q. » Wed May 08, 2019 9:42 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:We know you struggle with comprehension (see Franking Credits) but reference to 2013 is in regards to discussion of preferences.
Really! My information on franking credits comes from an Institute of Chartered Accountants seminar, fund managers and financial planners. I've posted articles from people who know more than me and certainly way more than you. But all those people are biased (and you talk about tin foil hat conspiracy theories! Yours comes from Labor Party trash and proven to be a complete lie.
My comprehension is fine. Maybe its just too fine for you hence why you make $hit up.
As for: "but reference to 2013 is in regards to discussion of preferences" You reckon I struggle with comprehension Chisholm said he's never discussed preferences with Palmer so that';s just fabricated BS again. Keep digging the hole!
Anyway, I have to get back to work
by Booney » Wed May 08, 2019 9:51 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed May 08, 2019 9:55 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |