by tigerpie » Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:09 pm
by Q. » Tue Feb 05, 2019 5:37 pm
If you do the sums, Jean is a multi millionare #prayforjeantigerpie wrote:How many people retire on 150k a year?
Jean should give the 12k back!
by Mr Beefy » Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:32 pm
Is Jean single?Q. wrote:If you do the sums, Jean is a multi millionare #prayforjeantigerpie wrote:How many people retire on 150k a year?
Jean should give the 12k back!
by tigerpie » Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:46 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Is Jean single?Q. wrote:If you do the sums, Jean is a multi millionare #prayforjeantigerpie wrote:How many people retire on 150k a year?
Jean should give the 12k back!
by Mr Beefy » Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:06 pm
Jean can afford a sex changetigerpie wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Is Jean single?Q. wrote:If you do the sums, Jean is a multi millionare #prayforjeantigerpie wrote:How many people retire on 150k a year?
Jean should give the 12k back!
Jean is a man man.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:35 am
Q. wrote:What new taxes might these be?Jimmy_041 wrote:It’s not before the election we have to worry about.
It’s the $200bn in new and increased taxes afterwards
Bowen thinks he’s a reincarnation of Keating - he wants the second “recession we had to have”
You sound like a Murdoch hack with the recession fear mongering
by Booney » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:40 am
by Q. » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:42 am
Its behind a paywall. But I've read others like it where they include removing negative gearing, removing franking credit tax refunds etc. as "new taxes" in the 200bn - which is shoddy journalismJimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:What new taxes might these be?Jimmy_041 wrote:It’s not before the election we have to worry about.
It’s the $200bn in new and increased taxes afterwards
Bowen thinks he’s a reincarnation of Keating - he wants the second “recession we had to have”
You sound like a Murdoch hack with the recession fear mongering
Keep the personal abuse out of it thanks Q
As far as I know, the Financial Review is not owned by Murdoch
https://www.afr.com/news/economy/chris- ... 122-h1abj4
by tigerpie » Wed Feb 06, 2019 4:59 pm
Booney wrote:ALP
"We should have a RC into the banks"
Morrison
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
RC into the banks hands down it's findings - Morrison
"We called the RC"
Seriously, does this bloke even believe his own bullshit? He should stop praying for rain and start praying for another job.
by Jimmy_041 » Wed Feb 06, 2019 5:20 pm
Q. wrote:Its behind a paywall. But I've read others like it where they include removing negative gearing, removing franking credit tax refunds etc. as "new taxes" in the 200bn - which is shoddy journalismJimmy_041 wrote:Q. wrote:What new taxes might these be?Jimmy_041 wrote:It’s not before the election we have to worry about.
It’s the $200bn in new and increased taxes afterwards
Bowen thinks he’s a reincarnation of Keating - he wants the second “recession we had to have”
You sound like a Murdoch hack with the recession fear mongering
Keep the personal abuse out of it thanks Q
As far as I know, the Financial Review is not owned by Murdoch
https://www.afr.com/news/economy/chris- ... 122-h1abj4
The last Labor govt saved us from a recession, so it's just pure fear mongering to suggest that electing them will lead to one
by Q. » Wed Feb 06, 2019 9:07 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Its behind a paywall. But I've read others like it where they include removing negative gearing, removing franking credit tax refunds etc. as "new taxes" in the 200bn - which is shoddy journalismQ. wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:What new taxes might these be?Q. wrote:[quote="Jimmy_041"]It’s not before the election we have to worry about.
It’s the $200bn in new and increased taxes afterwards
Bowen thinks he’s a reincarnation of Keating - he wants the second “recession we had to have”
You sound like a Murdoch hack with the recession fear mongering
Keep the personal abuse out of it thanks Q
As far as I know, the Financial Review is not owned by Murdoch
https://www.afr.com/news/economy/chris- ... 122-h1abj4
The last Labor govt saved us from a recession, so it's just pure fear mongering to suggest that electing them will lead to one
by DOC » Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:04 am
by DOC » Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:22 am
by Kahuna » Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:41 pm
DOC wrote:Australia's federal sports minister spent $20,000 of taxpayers' money ..........
by tipper » Fri Feb 08, 2019 11:44 am
by Q. » Fri Feb 08, 2019 2:19 pm
by tigerpie » Fri Feb 08, 2019 2:32 pm
by Booney » Fri Feb 08, 2019 3:08 pm
by Grenville » Fri Feb 08, 2019 8:56 pm
Booney wrote:The next 3 months of Liberal train wrecks and attacks on the ALP are going to be the lowest gutter rat version of politics we'll have seen for a while, if not ever. They are dead men (no women) walking and they know it, they will be trying any dirty trick they can to make the opposition look somewhere near as incompetent as they are.
It's going to be enthralling viewing.
by Brodlach » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:34 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |