by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:16 pm
by stan » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:34 pm
We have plenty of salary cap room for Lynch after we signed Dusty for massive $$$Brodlach wrote:Trade
Sam Lloyd to the Western Bulldogs for not much (some late draft pick)
by stan » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:35 pm
Why would be come out and say that?Booney wrote:"If Lukosius and Rankine end up going to Gold Coast, we're probably pretty happy to try to get them back in a few years' time," Cripps said.
"It's interesting, because then it just becomes a two-horse race between us and the Crows, as opposed to a Victorian kid that wants to come back home, who has potentially got 10 options.
"That's part of the discussion and strategy, but right at the minute, we're really comfortable with pick six."
"We're happy with any of the Victorian boys. We're going to back ourselves in," Cripps said.
"It's quite interesting at the moment because we've traditionally been really strong with retention, particularly with Victorian guys.
"We've actually got a little bit of a challenge at the moment, losing some South Australians in Jared Polec and Chad Wingard, which is a little bit unique."
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:36 pm
by stan » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:37 pm
Stop it with your facts. I've had enough of that garbage thank you.Booney wrote:He didn't just come out with it. [emoji38]
He was on a panel where they were discussing the "go home" factor and he was asked about this current crop of SA talent.
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:37 pm
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:38 pm
stan wrote:Stop it with your facts. I've had enough of that garbage thank you.Booney wrote:He didn't just come out with it. [emoji38]
He was on a panel where they were discussing the "go home" factor and he was asked about this current crop of SA talent.
by HH3 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:40 pm
Booney wrote:stan wrote:Stop it with your facts. I've had enough of that garbage thank you.Booney wrote:He didn't just come out with it. [emoji38]
He was on a panel where they were discussing the "go home" factor and he was asked about this current crop of SA talent.
*Media scrum/scum gather*
Cripps "Thanks for coming along today, we just wanted to warn the Suns about drafting SA boys this year as we'd be confident of getting them back in the future.
We won't be taking any questions. Thanks for your time"
*cameras click*
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:53 pm
by HH3 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 2:57 pm
Booney wrote:How does a piss take of a piss take work, or does it?
by MatteeG » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:13 pm
Booney wrote:The AFL sign off on all the trades as being fair and equitable.
Scully, former #1 pick, 26 years old, 152 games, he can't be traded for pick 53 to Hawthorn, surely?
How can the AFL sign that off as legit?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by HH3 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:25 pm
by whufc » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:27 pm
Booney wrote:The AFL sign off on all the trades as being fair and equitable.
Scully, former #1 pick, 26 years old, 152 games, he can't be traded for pick 53 to Hawthorn, surely?
How can the AFL sign that off as legit?
by mots02 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:32 pm
HH3 wrote:When did Brett Burton go to Hawthorn?
#haventwatchedagamesince99
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:42 pm
whufc wrote:Booney wrote:The AFL sign off on all the trades as being fair and equitable.
Scully, former #1 pick, 26 years old, 152 games, he can't be traded for pick 53 to Hawthorn, surely?
How can the AFL sign that off as legit?
How do they measure his affect on a team behind closed doors.
For all we know he could be a poison which is why a club would let him go for a packet of chips.
by whufc » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:45 pm
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Booney wrote:The AFL sign off on all the trades as being fair and equitable.
Scully, former #1 pick, 26 years old, 152 games, he can't be traded for pick 53 to Hawthorn, surely?
How can the AFL sign that off as legit?
How do they measure his affect on a team behind closed doors.
For all we know he could be a poison which is why a club would let him go for a packet of chips.
Clearly they don't, how could they? What they do is over see the trades to make sure there's no scull(y) duggery.
A #1 pick who is on $1m a year in exchange for pick 53, regardless of injury concerns ( of which there can't be many as the Hawks are offering him a 4 year deal! ) doesn't sit well.
by HH3 » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:47 pm
whufc wrote:Booney wrote:whufc wrote:Booney wrote:The AFL sign off on all the trades as being fair and equitable.
Scully, former #1 pick, 26 years old, 152 games, he can't be traded for pick 53 to Hawthorn, surely?
How can the AFL sign that off as legit?
How do they measure his affect on a team behind closed doors.
For all we know he could be a poison which is why a club would let him go for a packet of chips.
Clearly they don't, how could they? What they do is over see the trades to make sure there's no scull(y) duggery.
A #1 pick who is on $1m a year in exchange for pick 53, regardless of injury concerns ( of which there can't be many as the Hawks are offering him a 4 year deal! ) doesn't sit well.
Is this the second club to be willing to let him go.
Flags concerns to me that there is a reason for it, if anything the number pick he was sets of bigger flags. If he was a second strike player and the AFL knew would they then understand why a club would release him so cheaply.
I’m sure the AFL would have enquired as to why they are letting him go.
Maybe the club gave some solid financial planning in regards to the freed up salary.
by Brodlach » Mon Oct 15, 2018 3:54 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:05 pm
whufc wrote:
Is this the second club to be willing to let him go.
Flags concerns to me that there is a reason for it, if anything the number pick he was sets of bigger flags. If he was a second strike player and the AFL knew would they then understand why a club would release him so cheaply.
I’m sure the AFL would have enquired as to why they are letting him go.
Maybe the club gave some solid financial planning in regards to the freed up salary and potential tactic with that.
by whufc » Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:06 pm
Booney wrote:whufc wrote:
Is this the second club to be willing to let him go.
Flags concerns to me that there is a reason for it, if anything the number pick he was sets of bigger flags. If he was a second strike player and the AFL knew would they then understand why a club would release him so cheaply.
I’m sure the AFL would have enquired as to why they are letting him go.
Maybe the club gave some solid financial planning in regards to the freed up salary and potential tactic with that.
He took a 6 year $6m deal from GWS when they started up. He's cited personal reasons for wanting to go back to Victoria and that has to be respected.
He badly broke an ankle early this year ( that's for @HH3 who doesn't watch AFL football ) and there's reports it's not come along very well, but, Hawthorn has reportedly offered him a 4 year deal after putting him through a medical, the Hawks don't make mistakes like that.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |