by Down the Hill » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:26 pm
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:27 pm
by Corona Man » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:27 pm
amber_fluid wrote:What happens if they give the win to the Eagles?
Does Wedgie have to give his money back that he won?
by another grub » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:28 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:29 pm
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:29 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Hopefully the are just giving the Eagles a bit of lip service by having the tribunal.
The rules can not be any clearer imo.
No head count no breach.
I reckon it happened in a BL&G final a couple years back involving Barossa District i reckon. There was a head count and Barossa had 19 on field. I dont remember much about it but i believe they just recieved a fine and maybe a free kick at the time. Deciding wether the score should be wiped was left up to the directors during the week. JIM05 might remember more
by another grub » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:29 pm
by whufc » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:31 pm
another grub wrote:Cornsey says tribunal have no choice but to over turn the result.
by mighty hounds » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:32 pm
amber_fluid wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Hopefully the are just giving the Eagles a bit of lip service by having the tribunal.
The rules can not be any clearer imo.
No head count no breach.
I reckon it happened in a BL&G final a couple years back involving Barossa District i reckon. There was a head count and Barossa had 19 on field. I dont remember much about it but i believe they just recieved a fine and maybe a free kick at the time. Deciding wether the score should be wiped was left up to the directors during the week. JIM05 might remember more
Was that with Roger James as coach?
Didn’t they lose the game coz of it?
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:32 pm
another grub wrote:Cornsey says tribunal have no choice but to over turn the result.
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:33 pm
mighty hounds wrote:amber_fluid wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Hopefully the are just giving the Eagles a bit of lip service by having the tribunal.
The rules can not be any clearer imo.
No head count no breach.
I reckon it happened in a BL&G final a couple years back involving Barossa District i reckon. There was a head count and Barossa had 19 on field. I dont remember much about it but i believe they just recieved a fine and maybe a free kick at the time. Deciding wether the score should be wiped was left up to the directors during the week. JIM05 might remember more
Was that with Roger James as coach?
Didn’t they lose the game coz of it?
Roger James tried running off the field and thats when the head count was called. Barossa had their score wiped and i reckon Williston were the beneficiaries
by locky801 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:33 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:According to ch7 the Eagles have vision showing North knowingly kept the player out there.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:34 pm
No, just sharing it.locky801 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:According to ch7 the Eagles have vision showing North knowingly kept the player out there.
And you believe anything said on Channel 7
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:37 pm
Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What happens if they give the win to the Eagles?
Does Wedgie have to give his money back that he won?
And renounce his birthday?
by daysofourlives » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:38 pm
mighty hounds wrote:amber_fluid wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Hopefully the are just giving the Eagles a bit of lip service by having the tribunal.
The rules can not be any clearer imo.
No head count no breach.
I reckon it happened in a BL&G final a couple years back involving Barossa District i reckon. There was a head count and Barossa had 19 on field. I dont remember much about it but i believe they just recieved a fine and maybe a free kick at the time. Deciding wether the score should be wiped was left up to the directors during the week. JIM05 might remember more
Was that with Roger James as coach?
Didn’t they lose the game coz of it?
Roger James tried running off the field and thats when the head count was called. Barossa had their score wiped and i reckon Williston were the beneficiaries
by mal » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:38 pm
by locky801 » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:40 pm
mal wrote:A bit of talk about the opposition captain, should call for a count
So what happens if the captain is injured and in the changerooms?
by amber_fluid » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:43 pm
mal wrote:A bit of talk about the opposition captain, should call for a count
So what happens if the captain is injured and in the changerooms?
by jackpot jim » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:44 pm
Down the Hill wrote:Well they’ve brought in the big guns to make a decision. As a judge and QC surely the laws of the game must be upheld. Regardless of what rules or by-laws are put in place by a league regarding the game day penalty for having too many on the field one thing that seems to be consistent is that a player count conducted by the umpires has to take place after requested by the opposition captain. This didn’t occur so not sure how the outcome of the game can be changed. I suspect he may give recommendations as to preventing this happening again such as umpires checking with the benches that the correct number of players are off the field before the umpire starts each qtr but I can’t see him coming up with a finding that contradicts the laws of the game.
by Brodlach » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:46 pm
Jim05 wrote:Greg Edwards now with a nice little retort
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |