Jim05 wrote:Us by 3-4 goals
DOC wrote:Legs by 4 goals
Close enough Jim & DOC !!!
Could I impose upon you both the choice of my X-Lotto numbers for a few weeks fellas ?
Please PM me, we don't wan't to split the prize too many ways.
Luv,
Sabre.
by SABRE » Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:26 am
Jim05 wrote:Us by 3-4 goals
DOC wrote:Legs by 4 goals
by mal » Sat Jul 28, 2018 12:42 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:05 pm
mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
by Aerie » Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:13 pm
Jim05 wrote:mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players
by wedgetail » Sat Jul 28, 2018 6:22 pm
by spell_check » Sun Jul 29, 2018 1:21 am
by northerner » Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:28 pm
wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy. Premiership favs without doubt.
by Spargo » Mon Jul 30, 2018 8:27 pm
Aerie wrote:Jim05 wrote:mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players
And maybe Lukosius...
by SABRE » Mon Jul 30, 2018 8:34 pm
northerner wrote:wedgetail wrote:Norwood put on a clinic after 1/4 time. Too physically big and strong, quick, skilful ball movement, attractive brand of footy.
Premiership favs without doubt.
That's what I noticed when the Legs belted us at the Parade a couple of months ago. Even when they won their Premierships, these were based on a defensive-first philosophy which would have bored even the most ardent Leg supporters. Now they have been given license to run and gun and stun, and are playing without fear of making errors.
2018 is their Premiership to lose
PS.... why are Grigg and Panos not seen as AFL players? Grigg is like a man amongst boys at
SANFL level whilst Panos is a Pendlebury clone who kicks more goals … whats not to like?
by Jim05 » Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:31 pm
Spargo wrote:Aerie wrote:Jim05 wrote:mal wrote:Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players
And maybe Lukosius...
I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come
by stan » Tue Jul 31, 2018 8:01 am
Jim05 wrote:Spargo wrote:Aerie wrote:Jim05 wrote:[quote="mal"]Been told a Gold Coast observer watched this game
Should he be recommending to draft number 16 for Norwood ?
They are there to see number 14 and a couple of mature age players
And maybe Lukosius...
I would’ve thought. You Norwood lot are as arrogant as they come [emoji38]
by JK » Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:19 am
by goddy11 » Tue Jul 31, 2018 10:51 am
JK wrote:Much sooner lose them (and any other player) interstate rather than locally
by northerner » Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:41 pm
stan wrote:This may end up frustrating if say we lost a Grigg or Panos type of player due to the Gold Coast being a massive shit factory.
Looking forward to the rape and pillage.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |