 by amber_fluid » Sat Jun 30, 2018 2:46 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat Jun 30, 2018 2:46 pm 

 
 
                
                 
                
                 by JK » Sat Jun 30, 2018 2:47 pm
by JK » Sat Jun 30, 2018 2:47 pm 
amber_fluid wrote:C’mon Blues.
Curnow and Cripps are on fire.
 by jackpot jim » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:02 pm
by jackpot jim » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:02 pm 

 by Armchair expert » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:14 pm
by Armchair expert » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:14 pm 

 
 
                
                 by amber_fluid » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:16 pm
by amber_fluid » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:16 pm 

 
 
                
                 
                
                 by Jim05 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:16 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:16 pm 
jackpot jim wrote:Power just showing everyone why they have ZERO hope of winning the flag
Efficiency around goal is horrendous
Struggling to match it with a team of scrubbers
 by locky801 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:01 pm
by locky801 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:01 pm 
 by Q. » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:04 pm
by Q. » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:04 pm 
 by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:12 pm
by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:12 pm 
 by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:17 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:17 pm 

 
                
                 by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:26 pm
by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:26 pm 
Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
 by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:28 pm
by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:28 pm 
LMA wrote:Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
Clearly hits the post, a perfect example of when the review works
 by Q. » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:29 pm
by Q. » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:29 pm 
Clearly? Neither angle showed thatLMA wrote:Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
Clearly hits the post, a perfect example of when the review works
 by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:32 pm
by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:32 pm 
Spargo wrote:LMA wrote:Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
Clearly hits the post, a perfect example of when the review works
The Port player ran into the post causing it to move before the ball hit it.
What’s the rule there?
 by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:39 pm
by Spargo » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:39 pm 
LMA wrote:Spargo wrote:LMA wrote:Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
Clearly hits the post, a perfect example of when the review works
The Port player ran into the post causing it to move before the ball hit it.
What’s the rule there?
As long as the post isn't intentionally moved then its business as usual so to speak. As far as I'm aware
 by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:57 pm
by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:57 pm 
Q. wrote:Clearly? Neither angle showed thatLMA wrote:Q. wrote:How the hell could they overturn that goal?
Clearly hits the post, a perfect example of when the review works
 by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:00 pm
by LMA » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:00 pm 
 by locky801 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:09 pm
by locky801 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:09 pm 
LMA wrote:Curnow could write his own cheque on what we have seen from him on occasions this year
 by Jim05 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:14 pm
by Jim05 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:14 pm 
locky801 wrote:LMA wrote:Curnow could write his own cheque on what we have seen from him on occasions this year
will win a Brownlow in the future IMHO
 by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:17 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Jun 30, 2018 5:17 pm 

 
                
                 Football
 Football  AFL
 AFL
	
	
                                                        Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |
                                                        

