by Wasim1 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:56 pm
by carey » Wed Jun 27, 2018 10:56 pm
by footys the winner » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:02 pm
carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
by carey » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:03 pm
by carey » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:03 pm
footys the winner wrote:carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
Puts him under 12 I believe
by carey » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:04 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:07 pm
Wasim1 wrote:What a weak bunch we have running the circus!
Give the club's the option to vote on it so we don't have to make the call and then we can't be held accountable for the decision,.Heard the boss may have had a couple of things to say at the tribunal that were interesting but they can wait for another day.Question is though if correct, " why did he sit as a tribunal member when they have a cast of thousands? I thought the top dog only took notes if anything.Got his mate as the tribunal chairman too I see
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by marbles » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:13 pm
by Wasim1 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:19 pm
carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
by Wasim1 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:30 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Wasim1 wrote:What a weak bunch we have running the circus!
Give the club's the option to vote on it so we don't have to make the call and then we can't be held accountable for the decision,.Heard the boss may have had a couple of things to say at the tribunal that were interesting but they can wait for another day.Question is though if correct, " why did he sit as a tribunal member when they have a cast of thousands? I thought the top dog only took notes if anything.Got his mate as the tribunal chairman too I see
Go buy a clue Wasim, paid employees can't sit on the Tribunal![]()
They're some pretty big accusations you're making there....
by Wasim1 » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:37 pm
carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
by Footy Chick » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:38 pm
Wasim1 wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Wasim1 wrote:What a weak bunch we have running the circus!
Give the club's the option to vote on it so we don't have to make the call and then we can't be held accountable for the decision,.Heard the boss may have had a couple of things to say at the tribunal that were interesting but they can wait for another day.Question is though if correct, " why did he sit as a tribunal member when they have a cast of thousands? I thought the top dog only took notes if anything.Got his mate as the tribunal chairman too I see
Go buy a clue Wasim, paid employees can't sit on the Tribunal![]()
They're some pretty big accusations you're making there....
I thought that was the idea of this forum, voice your opinion and not have to worry about those members of the inner sanctum who are part of the fold.
I'm not sure about accusations, my info was that the boss satin the tribunal so if that is incorrect then I apologize.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:39 pm
Wasim1 wrote:carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
Incorrect reduced to 6 games
by Dutchy » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:41 pm
by Q. » Wed Jun 27, 2018 11:52 pm
They knowingly played at a club that had agreed to the conditions. Nobody forced them to be at SNFC.Dutchy wrote:Feel for the B/C graders who just want to play footy and most probably won't get a game in neighboring leagues if they explore that option.
by the joker » Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:00 am
nope. As SN are deregistered by the SAAFL he needs too serve somewhere else or next year.Dutchy wrote:Wasim1 wrote:carey wrote:Stengle down graded to 5 weeks.
Incorrect reduced to 6 games
Are the now defunct 2018 SN games covered in the suspension or does he need to serve them at his new club in 2019?
by whufc » Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:30 am
by carey » Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:31 am
Q. wrote:They knowingly played at a club that had agreed to the conditions. Nobody forced them to be at SNFC.Dutchy wrote:Feel for the B/C graders who just want to play footy and most probably won't get a game in neighboring leagues if they explore that option.
by The Informer » Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:41 am
by Q. » Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:53 am
I wouldn't ever let my club get to that pointcarey wrote:Q. wrote:They knowingly played at a club that had agreed to the conditions. Nobody forced them to be at SNFC.Dutchy wrote:Feel for the B/C graders who just want to play footy and most probably won't get a game in neighboring leagues if they explore that option.
Yeah and that makes all the difference. So if Houghton were but on some conditions you’d leave would you? Pffft give me a break, my lad has played at SNFC since he was 5 years old so don’t use the they weren’t forced to play at SNFC. He’d never leave because of these conditions just like you’d never leave Houghton.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |