JK wrote:I didnt say he was, I implied he was possibly under perceived pressure - Also said I understand the rule so didn't dispute it was a correct call, just don't like it being applied that way.
Fair enough. either they need to pay it alot more like they have with deliberate OOB or just scrap it all together. Who cares if theres 20 rushed behinds, at least it clears the congestion, cant be a bad thing