daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Any news on Walker's foot?
Adelaide dont do injury updates do they, 75000 members dont need to know how their captains foot is
It’s usually in his mouth.
by Corona Man » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:07 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Any news on Walker's foot?
Adelaide dont do injury updates do they, 75000 members dont need to know how their captains foot is
by Booney » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:11 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Any news on Walker's foot?
Adelaide dont do injury updates do they, 75000 members dont need to know how their captains foot is
by bertiebeatle » Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:33 pm
daysofourlives wrote:MW wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Any news on Walker's foot?
Adelaide dont do injury updates do they, 75000 members dont need to know how their captains foot is
What more needs to be said?
Foots ok now he's just playing shit and/or underdone
Sloane not on the injury list either, was sure someone on here said he was playing on one leg. Looks like Daisy was right again
No news on Betts either, you did play last Friday yeah? youd think4-5 days later there would be some news for all the adoring members
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:27 pm
Booney wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Booney wrote:Any news on Walker's foot?
Adelaide dont do injury updates do they, 75000 members dont need to know how their captains foot is
82,699 they say.
by MW » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:37 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:41 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jim05 » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:46 pm
MW wrote:"The number of Crows women’s team members has more than doubled this year, and the Club also continues to see strong support for its digital We Fly As One membership.
The membership figure is expected to continue to grow as the Club still has 3-game Bronze membership packages available for 2018 as well as Victorian General Admission memberships. For more information visit 19thman.com.au."
Just because it doesn't match with "AFL audit" requirements, doesn't mean there are not that many members.
Sure it will come down when they use their dick measuring tool but we are definitely a club that needs to worry about membership numbers!
by MW » Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:50 pm
by Corona Man » Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:24 pm
MW wrote:pffft why would we want that Melbourne fringe player as a member of our club? LOL
by bennymacca » Tue Apr 17, 2018 11:15 pm
Jim05 wrote:Unless you have match day tickets you are not a member
by cracka » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:57 am
Jim05 wrote:Unless you have match day tickets you are not a member
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 18, 2018 8:59 am
About 25% off the Crowscracka wrote:Jim05 wrote:Unless you have match day tickets you are not a member
Well that takes about 10% off most clubs membership numbers
by MW » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:00 am
by Booney » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:02 am
Jim05 wrote:Unless you have match day tickets you are not a member
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:41 am
MW wrote:At the end of the day, what does it really matter. As long as the measuring tool is consistent so clubs can track rates of improvement.
Unless all clubs have identical membership packages, you can't even compare.
by cracka » Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:58 am
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:At the end of the day, what does it really matter. As long as the measuring tool is consistent so clubs can track rates of improvement.
Unless all clubs have identical membership packages, you can't even compare.
It’s matters because despite the AFL telling the Crows what the requirements are to constitute a membership they still produce their own reports which are clearly wrong. Every other club in the comp can get it right
by MW » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:03 am
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:At the end of the day, what does it really matter. As long as the measuring tool is consistent so clubs can track rates of improvement.
Unless all clubs have identical membership packages, you can't even compare.
It’s matters because despite the AFL telling the Crows what the requirements are to constitute a membership they still produce their own reports which are clearly wrong. Every other club in the comp can get it right
by Jim05 » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:07 am
MW wrote:Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:At the end of the day, what does it really matter. As long as the measuring tool is consistent so clubs can track rates of improvement.
Unless all clubs have identical membership packages, you can't even compare.
It’s matters because despite the AFL telling the Crows what the requirements are to constitute a membership they still produce their own reports which are clearly wrong. Every other club in the comp can get it right
Are you saying every other club in the league matches their declared memberships with the AFL audit? please...
by Booney » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:10 am
Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:Jim05 wrote:MW wrote:At the end of the day, what does it really matter. As long as the measuring tool is consistent so clubs can track rates of improvement.
Unless all clubs have identical membership packages, you can't even compare.
It’s matters because despite the AFL telling the Crows what the requirements are to constitute a membership they still produce their own reports which are clearly wrong. Every other club in the comp can get it right
Are you saying every other club in the league matches their declared memberships with the AFL audit? please...
No they don’t but don’t believe any other clubs have anywhere near the massive variance the Crows do. I don’t understand why any club has to do it including ours. The AFL guidelines are there, whatever the figures are so be it so why invent numbers just for show
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |