by Old_mate21 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:26 am
by Pag » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:27 am
Old_mate21 wrote:Agreed that the club has every right to hold them and can if they so wish. I don’t understand as an outsider how that will be beneficial to your club moving forward. Why would a player sign in October for a club that has a history of turmoil.
by Old_mate21 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:33 am
by Groover » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:36 am
by Old_mate21 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:41 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:43 am
Old_mate21 wrote:Ha ha that is why your club will never move forward. Too many people with too much pride. No business sense at all, that is why you continuously find yourself in the positions you do.
by Groover » Mon Mar 19, 2018 11:59 am
by Inallseriousness » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:04 pm
Old_mate21 wrote:Agreed that the club has every right to hold them and can if they so wish. I don’t understand as an outsider how that will be beneficial to your club moving forward. Why would a player sign in October for a club that has a history of turmoil.
by easy TIGA » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:11 pm
Inallseriousness wrote:Old_mate21 wrote:Agreed that the club has every right to hold them and can if they so wish. I don’t understand as an outsider how that will be beneficial to your club moving forward. Why would a player sign in October for a club that has a history of turmoil.
It’s a tough one. As a coach, I would wanna make a statement of “you signed so you aren’t going anywhere” but in the bigger picture, what does that decision do to my reputation as a coach and the perception of my club.....is it more positive than negative? I don’t know the answer and everyone will have a different opinion. Each to their own I reckon. Run your own club how you want to and deal with the consequences (good or bad) when you have to. Good luck all.
by Pag » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:43 pm
Groover wrote:Compensation is against CFL rules pag as stated above, as for old mates comments all I can say is haters are gonna hate aren’t they.
Move on mate, players are contracted and the club is well within their right to hold them to that, should be end of discussion on the matter.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by human_torpedo » Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:59 pm
by Wilbur » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:31 pm
lovetotalkfooty wrote:Danky$$ wrote:I would let them go, brooks has said he isn’t gonna return he’s just gonna sit the year out. I know kilburn had Bruno olaughlin, Luke and cliff Wilson sign contracts for the 2018 season late last year but then they decided to head elsewhere and kilburn cleared them straight away. It’s local footy mate let the kid have fun not sit a year out.
Brooksy has zero connection to the club and will likely never ever return to the club again. I have never once asked brooksy to sit out the year and have always been honest about his desire to see out his contract and then make a decision about 2019. If he choses to sit out in 2018 then thats his decision.
Unfortunately its not local football anymore but a business. I wish it was different and yearn for the old days but players continue to demand money for their services and therefore almost become employees. The employer needs to be protected too.
by Wilbur » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:39 pm
ramming23 wrote:Wilbur wrote:Going to be a long year for 9 clubs in Div 6, no one will get close to West Croydon.
Cemented themselves as flag favourites yesterday after easily accounting for he Div 5 flag favourites (Lockleys).
Don’t base too much off a trial game. Lockleys were apparently quite a few of their key players down and West Croydon were almost full strength
by Nichdanmatt » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:48 pm
by S Demon » Mon Mar 19, 2018 1:59 pm
Groover wrote:Maybe the club trying to sign these lads should have realised they were already contracted and turned them away instead of crying foul when they don’t get cleared...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
by Old_mate21 » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:10 pm
by Groover » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:19 pm
S Demon wrote:Groover wrote:Maybe the club trying to sign these lads should have realised they were already contracted and turned them away instead of crying foul when they don’t get cleared...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is the same logic applied if a club contacts a coach who is already under contract and tries to poach them? Glass houses.
by Groover » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:24 pm
Old_mate21 wrote:Has Brahma ever had a contracted player and sacked them?
by Q. » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:29 pm
They had a contracted coach and sacked him before R1Old_mate21 wrote:Has Brahma ever had a contracted player and sacked them?
by zedman » Mon Mar 19, 2018 2:45 pm
Wilbur wrote:ramming23 wrote:Wilbur wrote:Going to be a long year for 9 clubs in Div 6, no one will get close to West Croydon.
Cemented themselves as flag favourites yesterday after easily accounting for he Div 5 flag favourites (Lockleys).
Don’t base too much off a trial game. Lockleys were apparently quite a few of their key players down and West Croydon were almost full strength
I'm sure the Dees did have a couple out, but lets remember that they are the D5 flag favourites, and have got great depth, so a couple out probably isn't going to make as big a difference to them as it would other sides.
The Dees are very confident of going all the way this year, they've learnt somewhat from last year though and are keeping a lid on it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |