MW wrote:I think in a 7 game season, draws should not exist. It's too damaging for both sides. Play extra time, they only play 15 min quarters anyway.
There will be a lot of late dinners around the country then.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:10 am
MW wrote:I think in a 7 game season, draws should not exist. It's too damaging for both sides. Play extra time, they only play 15 min quarters anyway.
by The Bedge » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:54 am
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:58 am
The Bedge wrote:I shouldn't laugh.. but I kind of did..
"AFLW player claims she was sexually harassed by opponent during game "
http://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/afl/aflw ... ocid=ientp
by Corona Man » Fri Mar 16, 2018 6:58 pm
by valleys07 » Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:15 pm
Corona Man wrote:Brisbane girls are giving the GWS girls a fair “licking” at half time, here’s hoping the GES girls strap it on in the next half!
by Brodlach » Sat Mar 17, 2018 11:40 am
valleys07 wrote:Corona Man wrote:Brisbane girls are giving the GWS girls a fair “licking” at half time, here’s hoping the GES girls strap it on in the next half!
Frederick-Traube the difference. She is a unit!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:12 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:22 pm
Booney wrote:The Bulldogs Katie Brennan received a one game suspension last week ruling her out of the AFLW Grand Final.
The Bulldogs took it to the tribunal and lost.
They're now appealing that decision arguing that the rule interpretations between the mens and womens game is a breach of federal sexual discrimination laws.
by mots02 » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:27 pm
Booney wrote:The Bulldogs Katie Brennan received a one game suspension last week ruling her out of the AFLW Grand Final.
The Bulldogs took it to the tribunal and lost.
They're now appealing that decision arguing that the rule interpretations between the mens and womens game is a breach of federal sexual discrimination laws.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:28 pm
by hollywood7477 » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:38 pm
by bennymacca » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:39 pm
Booney wrote:The Bulldogs Katie Brennan received a one game suspension last week ruling her out of the AFLW Grand Final.
The Bulldogs took it to the tribunal and lost.
They're now appealing that decision arguing that the rule interpretations between the mens and womens game is a breach of federal sexual discrimination laws.
by MW » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:48 pm
by bennymacca » Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:56 pm
MW wrote:Wasn't she on a second offense for the year? Would that still be a $5k fine in mens?
by HH3 » Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:39 am
You'd still be cut on skill level.amber_fluid wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Is post op?
I'm not sure what bits are still about but is 6"3, 100kg's with an Adam's apple, was playing handball at Olympic level for Australia in 2015.
I'm 6"3, 99kg and have a dick.
Can I play?
by JK » Fri Mar 23, 2018 1:54 am
bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:The Bulldogs Katie Brennan received a one game suspension last week ruling her out of the AFLW Grand Final.
The Bulldogs took it to the tribunal and lost.
They're now appealing that decision arguing that the rule interpretations between the mens and womens game is a breach of federal sexual discrimination laws.
Ive heard gerard whateley talk about this recently
basically if it was graded exactly the same in the mens game it would have been a $5k fine, but they didnt want to do that because the women comparatively earn much less. so they decided to keep it as a supsension instead of a fine.
by bertiebeatle » Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:31 am
JK wrote:bennymacca wrote:Booney wrote:The Bulldogs Katie Brennan received a one game suspension last week ruling her out of the AFLW Grand Final.
The Bulldogs took it to the tribunal and lost.
They're now appealing that decision arguing that the rule interpretations between the mens and womens game is a breach of federal sexual discrimination laws.
Ive heard gerard whateley talk about this recently
basically if it was graded exactly the same in the mens game it would have been a $5k fine, but they didnt want to do that because the women comparatively earn much less. so they decided to keep it as a supsension instead of a fine.
Was that the thinking at tribunal over this incident, or prior to the commencement of the season?
by bennymacca » Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:37 am
by Dogwatcher » Fri Mar 23, 2018 8:25 am
by HH3 » Fri Mar 23, 2018 9:18 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |