Southern Football League

[FootyMad]

dont know anything about it footymad just put 2 and 2 together with u being down at eb with him . would be a big get for hackem though first positive thing i have heard about the all year

i don't know if that positive at all.

from all reports he's a tosser and a criminal , edited by Dutchy please no accusations that could get us and you in legal trouble....thanks.

Nah he's a good bloke actually, as far as a XXXXX well I wasn't there but I can certainly tell you he doesn't touch alcohol in the slightest.
Im with the wonder though, he will attract players in the area, along with cotton could be interesting.

[Swooper16]

has this happened b4 then ?

They have tried before but to no avail...

Surely Valleys wont forfeit this one

[AFLflyer]

dont know anything about it footymad just put 2 and 2 together with u being down at eb with him . would be a big get for hackem though first positive thing i have heard about the all year

i don't know if that positive at all.

from all reports he's a tosser and a criminal , edited by Dutchy please no accusations that could get us and you in legal trouble....thanks.

Nah he's a good bloke actually, as far as a XXXXXX well I wasn't there but I can certainly tell you he doesn't touch alcohol in the slightest.
Im with the wonder though, he will attract players in the area, along with cotton could be interesting.

alcohol was probaly the problem for him then. good to hear hes off the booze - still dosnt excuse what he allegedly done though.

Hackham's problems were not fixed by Klompy. ex footy star

[Zelezny Chucks]

has this happened b4 then ?

They have tried before but to no avail...

Surely Valleys wont forfeit this one

Rivetting!

[FootyMad]

dont know anything about it footymad just put 2 and 2 together with u being down at eb with him . would be a big get for hackem though first positive thing i have heard about the all year

i don't know if that positive at all.

from all reports he's a tosser and a criminal , edited by Dutchy please no accusations that could get us and you in legal trouble....thanks

Nah he's a good bloke actually, as far as a XXXXX well I wasn't there but I can certainly tell you he doesn't touch alcohol in the slightest.
Im with the wonder though, he will attract players in the area, along with cotton could be interesting.

alcohol was probaly the problem for him then. good to hear hes off the booze - still dosnt excuse what he allegedly done though.

Hackham's problems were not fixed by Klompy. ex footy star

Completely agreed mate, allegedly is the key word though along with alleged accomplices who are currently still playing.
Good point about Klomp, thing is a club like Hackham cant put all its eggs in one basket, will need to recruit a core group of players rather than one or two names.

[Dutchy]

Lads....Ive just edited the comments about Hueskes, please dont make unsubstantiated statements that could get everyone in legal trouble, that would soon mean the end of this site....if you need to do this please use the word "allegedly", but not in the context that was used...

We are all for good robust debate and discussion however there is a line we have to make sure that is not crossed....play on

[Swooper16]

has this happened b4 then ?

They have tried before but to no avail...

Surely Valleys wont forfeit this one

Rivetting!

Quick lesson for you Chuckles. This was a half joke half historical reference to the time Happy valley forfeited an A grade game for premiership points against Brighton. And backed up what Franky was implying about Valleys up to their old tricks again.

Perhaps what I should have written was that Brighton will need to find something to beat happy valley.

That’s it for me with this pointless banter with yourself - your record on this forum clearly demonstrates that you do not have the wit or intellect to add anything to any discussion and I dread your reply where you back up your inane comments with payouts like “dicklips”.

[Zelezny Chucks]

Surely Valleys wont forfeit this one [/quote]

Rivetting![/quote]

Quick lesson for you Chuckles. This was a half joke half historical reference to the time Happy valley forfeited an A grade game for premiership points against Brighton. And backed up what Franky was implying about Valleys up to their old tricks again.

Perhaps what I should have written was that Brighton will need to find something to beat happy valley.

That’s it for me with this pointless banter with yourself - your record on this forum clearly demonstrates that you do not have the wit or intellect to add anything to any discussion and I dread your reply where you back up your inane comments with payouts like “dicklips”.[/quote]

Just a quick question do you live at Brighton because it seems you like looking down your nose at people like a bomber would?

[the wonder elephant]

hey girthy you boys any chance of the finals this week or are you gone already ?
leave the tinshed alone mate its been upgraded to a double garage with electronic rollerdoors i will happily inform you

[The Girth]

thats good to hear trunky as for us the A grade will just be having a casual kick and a catch this weekend as they have missed out but the B grade need to win to sneak into the finals

[FootyMad]

what is the final 8 boys? Can it be shaped by this weeks round?

[Zelezny Chucks]

what is the final 8 boys? Can it be shaped by this weeks round?

as far as I know (which according to most isn't much) the only game that has any real influence is the Brighton v Valley game winner grabs fourth spot

[KEYDEFENDER]

Was at the Emus Brighton game last week. was rather dissapointed both sides looked very scrappy and didnt have much flow. Would think that they will have to improve a bit to win the flag, Valleys may be the big suprise packets and take this one out.

Perhaps it was a hardly fought contest between 2 quality sides with lots of pressure... No where to hide at Emu Park... Will be interesting to see who the winner is out of the Valley Bommbers game this week. Surprise surprise i'm gonna back the Valley by less than 2 goals... What do you reckon Franky..??

Did the game look scrappy?.. or was it the dust and pot holes which made it look that way.. would be nice if the premier of the last few years channeled some $$ towards a better surface

[Zelezny Chucks]

Was at the Emus Brighton game last week. was rather dissapointed both sides looked very scrappy and didnt have much flow. Would think that they will have to improve a bit to win the flag, Valleys may be the big suprise packets and take this one out.

Perhaps it was a hardly fought contest between 2 quality sides with lots of pressure... No where to hide at Emu Park... Will be interesting to see who the winner is out of the Valley Bommbers game this week. Surprise surprise i'm gonna back the Valley by less than 2 goals... What do you reckon Franky..??

Did the game look scrappy?.. or was it the dust and pot holes which made it look that way.. would be nice if the premier of the last few years channeled some $$ towards a better surface

Council issue isnt it?

[Swooper16]

Is there anything you dont have a view on Zelezny.....if so please advise and the rest of us will start discussing that!!

[Zelezny Chucks]

Is there anything you dont have a view on Zelezny.....if so please advise and the rest of us will start discussing that!!

Your fascination with everything I say? What are your thoughts on that?

[BIG RED DELICIOUS]

second that SWOOP! how are the A's travelling over at Reynella" Fly and Rock".? 2 loses on the trott cant be good this time of year for confidence and team moral..... heard a whisper that a few lads playing B's and playing really well, are a really pissed at being overlooked for the first team leading into finals. I know Bomber would be pretty happy with the situation at the moment but any truth to the rumour?

[mrf]

I heard that the sfl is bringing in a points system to recruit players. If this is the case 180K would not help Hackam as you can only have a certain amount of imports. Anyone else hear this?

[KEYDEFENDER]

Was at the Emus Brighton game last week. was rather dissapointed both sides looked very scrappy and didnt have much flow. Would think that they will have to improve a bit to win the flag, Valleys may be the big suprise packets and take this one out.

Perhaps it was a hardly fought contest between 2 quality sides with lots of pressure... No where to hide at Emu Park... Will be interesting to see who the winner is out of the Valley Bommbers game this week. Surprise surprise i'm gonna back the Valley by less than 2 goals... What do you reckon Franky..??

Did the game look scrappy?.. or was it the dust and pot holes which made it look that way.. would be nice if the premier of the last few years channeled some $$ towards a better surface

Council issue isnt it?

I suppose it would be.. obviously hackham at one stage got a grant or fundraised the cash themself.. that oval used to be a swamp. Seems most of the grounds are getting better. M/Vale has gravel/dirt/weeds , seems a mismatch for a strong club to be using substandard ground yet Hackham cant get a side together and has superior facilities..

[Buff]

[quote="KEYDEFENDER"][quote="Zelezny Chucks"][quote="KEYDEFENDER"][quote="The Mexican"][quote="Insider"]Was at the Emus Brighton game last week. was rather dissapointed both sides looked very scrappy and didnt have much flow. Would think that they will have to improve a bit to win the flag, Valleys may be the big suprise packets and take this one out.[/quote]

Perhaps it was a hardly fought contest between 2 quality sides with lots of pressure... No where to hide at Emu Park... Will be interesting to see who the winner is out of the Valley Bommbers game this week. Surprise surprise i'm gonna back the Valley by less than 2 goals... What do you reckon Franky..??[/quote]


Did the game look scrappy?.. or was it the dust and pot holes which made it look that way.. would be nice if the premier of the last few years channeled some $$ towards a better surface [/quote]

Council issue isnt it?[/quote]

I suppose it would be.. obviously hackham at one stage got a grant or fundraised the cash themself.. that oval used to be a swamp. Seems most of the grounds are getting better. M/Vale has gravel/dirt/weeds , seems a mismatch for a strong club to be using substandard ground yet Hackham cant get a side together and has superior facilities..[/quote]

I agree with ya KD. ankles and knees copping a pounding! was better when it had no grass on it...at least it was flat then!!!!