Magellan wrote:Executive Member wrote:I thought Nz'ers spent 6 months on a leaky boat to get here
Not anymore, History Never Repeats. I Got You there.
I'll bet you tell yourself that before you go to sleep.
by Grenville » Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:47 pm
Magellan wrote:Executive Member wrote:I thought Nz'ers spent 6 months on a leaky boat to get here
Not anymore, History Never Repeats. I Got You there.
by tigerpie » Mon Jan 08, 2018 5:48 pm
by Psyber » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:26 am
Q. wrote:LNP caught lying again - this time about impact of abolishing negative gearing
by Q. » Tue Jan 09, 2018 11:35 am
Psyber wrote:But the question is: "Why did Paul Keating restore negative gearing if he thought getting rid of it was a good idea at first?"
by morell » Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:20 am
Urgh, god you're a bore.Jimmy_041 wrote:morell wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Interestingly, according to something I read yesterday, more New Zealanders commit crimes in Victoria than Sudanese.
I meant migrants that do illegal shit or consume services and cost the tax payer.
Illegal immigration was the wrong term to use.
So what's that got to do with: "But you know, they're white and come in a plane, so it's all good, cuzzy bro."
Failed attempted recovery bro
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jan 11, 2018 3:26 pm
morell wrote:Urgh, god you're a bore.Jimmy_041 wrote:morell wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Interestingly, according to something I read yesterday, more New Zealanders commit crimes in Victoria than Sudanese.
I meant migrants that do illegal shit or consume services and cost the tax payer.
Illegal immigration was the wrong term to use.
So what's that got to do with: "But you know, they're white and come in a plane, so it's all good, cuzzy bro."
Failed attempted recovery bro
It's ok to the rank and file that kiwis come here, commit crimes, use up taxes and what not, to the point that they are the biggest burden to said taxpayer in terms of migrant communities. Yet we don't have politicians bemoaning the waves of kiwi gangs or wearing traditional maori clothes nor do we have vitriol directed at them en masse by Reclaim Australia types because ... they come here by plane and look ok. That was my point.
If my incorrect using of "illegal immigrants" instead of "immigrants that do illegal shit" bars you up, then half your luck, bro. I could argue that if a kiwi does something illegal they have violated the terms of their Special Category visa (subclass 444) and are therefore, illegal migrants and require deportation, but that would be me being a pedant. and no one likes a pedant.
by Q. » Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:06 pm
by morell » Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:25 pm
How many times would you like me to admit I used the incorrect term?Jimmy_041 wrote:Sorry, must be my poor interpretive skills
So:
"illegal immigrants" now means"immigrants that do illegal shit"
"white" now includes Maori
Consequently "come in a plane" can't be referring to illegal immigrants flying in instead of coming by boat. How does that fit into this interpretation of yours?
by Pistol Pete » Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:50 am
I feel you need to say it at least 4 more times.morell wrote:How many times would you like me to admit I used the incorrect term?Jimmy_041 wrote:Sorry, must be my poor interpretive skills
So:
"illegal immigrants" now means"immigrants that do illegal shit"
"white" now includes Maori
Consequently "come in a plane" can't be referring to illegal immigrants flying in instead of coming by boat. How does that fit into this interpretation of yours?
As this makes three times. Will it take four? Five?
Despite this, the overarching point is valid:
We only care about non-white immigration
by morell » Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:52 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Nah, I don't buy it.
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:44 am
by morell » Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:49 am
by Trader » Fri Jan 12, 2018 1:28 pm
by bennymacca » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:01 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:19 pm
by bennymacca » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:22 pm
by Trader » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:22 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:As people grow into their community, it also reduces.
Remember the Asian crime fear of the early 90s?
Weren't true blue Aussies worried about crime in the 50s and 60s as Italian and Greek immigrants moved here?
by Ronnie » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:23 pm
bennymacca wrote:cant remember where i read it, but if you control for socio-economic factors dont most of those crime rate figures disappear back into the noise?
i.e not much different to others that live in the same suburbs, earn similar income etc
by Q. » Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:26 pm
It's not a factor of 45. Your 2011 population data compared to 2015 crime data is way out.Trader wrote:Morell, what are your thoughts on the nature and rates of crime from various immigrant groups?
I agree NZ are the largest group of immigrants doing illegal things, but they are also the largest group are they not?
The rate of crime (45 times the general population) and nature of the crimes that we see reported from the Sudanese Immigrants is a large cause for concern in my opinion.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |