by whufc » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:32 pm
by amber_fluid » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:34 pm
by bennymacca » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:35 pm
by Corona Man » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:37 pm
amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
by whufc » Fri Jan 05, 2018 7:39 pm
bennymacca wrote:Now this seems silly.
2-3 hours is the perfect amount of time for a game of sport, especially if you want to take kids.
20 overs of cricket would take 90 mins, why would you bother?
by RB » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:01 pm
Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
How about T.1
by Corona Man » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:04 pm
RB wrote:Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
How about T.1
Each team gets one delivery, losing team is executed...
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:08 pm
Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
How about T.1
by RustyCage » Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:23 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:30 pm
amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:30 pm
Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
How about T.1
by Booney » Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:39 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Jan 08, 2018 12:48 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Corona Man wrote:amber_fluid wrote:What next?
T5?
How about T.1
How about Cricket 0.1?
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:03 pm
by Tony Clifton » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:06 pm
by Booney » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:15 pm
Tony Clifton wrote:The Twenty20 purists won't like this
by Magellan » Mon Jan 08, 2018 3:29 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:04 pm
Booney wrote:Tony Clifton wrote:The Twenty20 purists won't like this
Lamenting the pitfalls of shorter form cricket?
by whufc » Mon Jan 08, 2018 4:23 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Is T10 a further attempt at positioning cricket for the Olympics?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:44 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |