by ferret » Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:53 am
by Magellan » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:37 pm
goddy11 wrote:JK wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:sib wrote:Luke WIlson has played SANFL footy level before at Port with his brother. Now we got all 3 brothers together.Wilson Brothers on the Parade.jpg
And the 4th brother
Wasn't he eaten by a shark.
by Pseudo » Fri Dec 15, 2017 12:49 pm
goddy11 wrote:JK wrote:
Wasn't he eaten by a shark.
by DOC » Fri Dec 15, 2017 2:44 pm
by Booney » Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:46 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Dec 15, 2017 6:58 pm
Booney wrote:Menu
SubscribeLogin
NEWS AFL SPORT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE MOTORING CLASSIFIEDS
WEST & BEACHES
Daniela Abbracciavento, Portside Weekly Messenger
December 15, 2017 4:39pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Dutchy » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:31 pm
Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
by Booney » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:42 pm
Wedgie wrote:Booney wrote:Menu
SubscribeLogin
NEWS AFL SPORT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS LIFESTYLE REAL ESTATE MOTORING CLASSIFIEDS
WEST & BEACHES
Daniela Abbracciavento, Portside Weekly Messenger
December 15, 2017 4:39pm
Excellent news!
by amber_fluid » Fri Dec 15, 2017 7:59 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
by goddy11 » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:25 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
by daysofourlives » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:31 pm
goddy11 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
So in a perfect world if the crows have a marquee and no injuries some of their AFL players may not get a game at all.
by Pseudo » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:34 pm
Booney wrote:“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
by Spargo » Fri Dec 15, 2017 8:56 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous
by Magellan » Fri Dec 15, 2017 10:52 pm
Pseudo wrote:Booney wrote:“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
by JK » Fri Dec 15, 2017 11:21 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous
by johntheclaret » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:56 am
Magellan wrote:goddy11 wrote:JK wrote:PatowalongaPirate wrote:
[attachment=0]Wilson
And the 4th brother
Wasn't he eaten by a shark.
Needed someone to pump up his inflated ego, and eventually let himself down.
by johntheclaret » Sat Dec 16, 2017 3:58 am
Pseudo wrote:goddy11 wrote:JK wrote:
Wasn't he eaten by a shark.
No, that was one of his relatives:
by Magellan » Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:44 am
by JK » Sat Dec 16, 2017 7:52 am
Magellan wrote:All this hurley-Burley's making my hair go curly and twirly, surely someone should get in early and bring back Craig Turley.
by goddy11 » Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:18 am
amber_fluid wrote:Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:
Kelly said the former stipulation had not contemplated that all 21 AFL-listed players would be available, resulting in no top-up players lining up in a league match.
“The provisions of the licence agreement … were included to ensure that the teams of each (AFL) club were playing the line and wanting to win,” Kelly said.
“Both clubs have honoured this principle and demonstrated through their players a commitment to the contest and respect for the competition.
“Ultimately, the SANFL has agreed with Port Adelaide that it is appropriate that the marquee player be able to be selected before an AFL-listed player on the occasion that 21 are available for SANFL selection.”
With 46 on the list they didn't add up that 22+21 = 43??? and this scenario was a possibility???
Policy on the run, and they still use the "integrity" word, these blokes are almost worse than Politicians!
The reality is they changed the rule for one bloke!
Ridiculous
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |