by gadj1976 » Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:38 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Nov 15, 2017 9:43 pm
gadj1976 wrote:I'd like to retire and still get paid the following year after my retirement - how good is that (for him)?
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Nov 16, 2017 8:44 am
Corona Man wrote:Sounds like Vickery has put the cue in the rack... only 5 seasons too late. We've dodged a bullet there, at least we don't have to pay him to stink it up at Box Hill.
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:16 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:22 am
Brodlach wrote:Cannot sack him if he wasn’t a part of it
Probably both agreed he wasn’t part of the clubs future and cane to an agreement. He could stay and get the full amount or travel with his wife and get half. Know what I would do
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:24 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Nov 16, 2017 9:38 am
Brodlach wrote:Just questioned I thought
by daysofourlives » Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:45 pm
bennymacca wrote:gadj1976 wrote:I'd like to retire and still get paid the following year after my retirement - how good is that (for him)?
Fair chance he was asked to retire and they could upgrade a rookie? Otherwise why would he get paid? List lodgement isn’t yet
by Booney » Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:50 pm
daysofourlives wrote:bennymacca wrote:gadj1976 wrote:I'd like to retire and still get paid the following year after my retirement - how good is that (for him)?
Fair chance he was asked to retire and they could upgrade a rookie? Otherwise why would he get paid? List lodgement isn’t yet
Doesnt matter about list lodgement, yeah i think it frees up a rookie spot. As others have said it would be an agreed settlement. The full amount s contr is included in Hawthorns salary cap so cant be used on other players. It is the exact same situation as what the AFL said about Buddys 9 year contract at Sydney, if he decides to retire after 6 years the Swans have to carry his salary for the last 3 years of his contract on their books, that is the massive risk Sydney took. Imagine if he quit after his "mental health " problems, sydney would be buggered for years although im sure the AFL would come to the rescue and change the rules
by daysofourlives » Thu Nov 16, 2017 2:54 pm
by Booney » Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:02 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Nov 16, 2017 3:49 pm
by Brodlach » Thu Nov 16, 2017 4:12 pm
Booney wrote:Anyway, Hawks will be paying Vickery around $500,000 next year.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Jim05 » Thu Nov 16, 2017 4:15 pm
Brodlach wrote:Booney wrote:Anyway, Hawks will be paying Vickery around $500,000 next year.
Two years wage equates to $166,666 per AFL game he played. Nice coin
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |