by The Bedge » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:26 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by The Bedge » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:26 pm
Booney wrote:Shows what we think if this years draft.
****
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:28 pm
The Bedge wrote:It's clear the draft is very shallow this year and Port obviously have very limited interest in heading to it for any top ups. Recycling players even for if only a year as depth is the best way to go and have a red hot crack in 2018, and then attack the 2018 draft and replace those who have served a purpose.
by The Bedge » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:29 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:32 pm
The Bedge wrote:To be fair, I think Thomas > Eddy - and he was the insurance for the Port forward line this year.. it's still an upgrade.
Thomas also provides coverage for Motlop should he get injured, and I reckon i'd prefer Thomas over Neade.
Would Kangas paying most his salary work out cheaper for Port than picking up a rookie, or about the same?
by The Bedge » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:37 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:45 pm
The Bedge wrote:Looking over the Port list, like it or not they probably need an extra experienced player capable of being a back up.
Have lost
Monfries - 211 games experience
White - 153 games experience
Trengove - 153 games experience
Lobbe - 92 games experience
Krakouer - 82 games experience
Young - 76 games experience
Impey - 75 games experience
Toumpas - 37 games experience
Ah Chee - 27 games experience
Eddy - 3 games
Palmer - 3 games
Austin - 13 games
Once you get through the more experienced players on the list, there really isn't a lot of ready-to-go depth around at the moment.
by Dutchy » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:04 pm
Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:It's clear the draft is very shallow this year and Port obviously have very limited interest in heading to it for any top ups. Recycling players even for if only a year as depth is the best way to go and have a red hot crack in 2018, and then attack the 2018 draft and replace those who have served a purpose.
Kangas pay Thomas to play for us or we take a kid at pick 58 for two years.
I'll take the kid.
****
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:11 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:The Bedge wrote:It's clear the draft is very shallow this year and Port obviously have very limited interest in heading to it for any top ups. Recycling players even for if only a year as depth is the best way to go and have a red hot crack in 2018, and then attack the 2018 draft and replace those who have served a purpose.
Kangas pay Thomas to play for us or we take a kid at pick 58 for two years.
I'll take the kid.
****
Dont worry, pick 58 history reveals plodders like Dane Swan and Lachie Neale got picked up in this slot!
by Dutchy » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:17 pm
Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Brodlach wrote:Lindsay Thomas cleared to play after given a $1000 for his kicking incident
Fair call, it looked worse than what it was.
He's going to donate it to the screen actors guild, it will help him in his next career move.
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:22 pm
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Brodlach wrote:Lindsay Thomas cleared to play after given a $1000 for his kicking incident
Fair call, it looked worse than what it was.
He's going to donate it to the screen actors guild, it will help him in his next career move.
Post his Power career?
by Spargo » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:28 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Nov 03, 2017 1:54 pm
Spargo wrote:On fire Dutchy
by Booney » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:14 pm
Dutchy wrote:Spargo wrote:On fire Dutchy
There is soooo much more
by The Bedge » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:19 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by mots02 » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:20 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Nov 03, 2017 2:32 pm
The Bedge wrote:That's a pretty good effort Dutchy!
by amber_fluid » Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:23 pm
The Bedge wrote:To be fair, I think Thomas > Eddy - and he was the insurance for the Port forward line this year.. it's still an upgrade.
Thomas also provides coverage for Motlop should he get injured, and I reckon i'd prefer Thomas over Neade.
Would Kangas paying most his salary work out cheaper for Port than picking up a rookie, or about the same?
by MW » Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:36 pm
by amber_fluid » Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:38 pm
MW wrote:So now you've signed Jack Trengove. You're taking the piss now surely...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |