Dutchy wrote:He is getting more than some Div 1 players
Anyone who gets a can of coke after the game is doing better than a large chunk of D1 players.
by jo172 » Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:17 pm
Dutchy wrote:He is getting more than some Div 1 players
by Yank Man » Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:03 pm
Dutchy wrote:He is getting more than some Div 1 players
by marbles » Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:16 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:10 pm
jo172 wrote:Dutchy wrote:He is getting more than some Div 1 players
Anyone who gets a can of coke after the game is doing better than a large chunk of D1 players.
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:22 am
Ditchy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reynella finished 6th last year, Reckon they are an ordinary club?[/quote
No one is questioning whether they're a good club or a well run club or the quality of the people at the club
What we can safely say is that the standard of the SFL is diabolical after the first 3/4 clubs and those 3 or 4 clubs who are reasonable would be no higher than mid divvy 2 or divvy 3 of the ammos. There wouldn't be 2 many people who'd think the standard of the SFL is very high at all
by Purple Warrior » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:29 am
by Q. » Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:39 am
Purple Warrior wrote:Anything under the top 3 or 4 teams in div 3 is very average and getting worse every year.
by morell » Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:49 pm
by Ditchy » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:10 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Ditchy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reynella finished 6th last year, Reckon they are an ordinary club?[/quote
No one is questioning whether they're a good club or a well run club or the quality of the people at the club
What we can safely say is that the standard of the SFL is diabolical after the first 3/4 clubs and those 3 or 4 clubs who are reasonable would be no higher than mid divvy 2 or divvy 3 of the ammos. There wouldn't be 2 many people who'd think the standard of the SFL is very high at all
"Diabolical" - nice troll!
We will see how BDOS & Morphie Park go this year. Edwardstown were mid range in SFL in 2015 and mid-range in Div 4 in 2016. Are you saying Div 4 is diabolical? From what I am told there is a good standard of football played at that level, unless of course your only football knowledge comes from watching AFL on TV and use that fully professional competition as your benchmark.
by LaughingKookaburra » Wed Jan 11, 2017 6:29 am
Purple Warrior wrote:Anything under the top 3 or 4 teams in div 3 is very average and getting worse every year.
by Purple Warrior » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:08 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Purple Warrior wrote:Anything under the top 3 or 4 teams in div 3 is very average and getting worse every year.
Obviously didn't see div 4 in 2016. As good as div 4 has ever been and some pretty handy teams that wouldn't go down to those top 3-4 teams in div 3 you refer to without a serious fight and at times would probably knock them off.
by jo172 » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:16 am
by marbles » Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:35 am
by morell » Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:14 am
Ditchy wrote:Look Good In Leather wrote:Ditchy wrote:Dutchy wrote:Reynella finished 6th last year, Reckon they are an ordinary club?[/quote
No one is questioning whether they're a good club or a well run club or the quality of the people at the club
What we can safely say is that the standard of the SFL is diabolical after the first 3/4 clubs and those 3 or 4 clubs who are reasonable would be no higher than mid divvy 2 or divvy 3 of the ammos. There wouldn't be 2 many people who'd think the standard of the SFL is very high at all
"Diabolical" - nice troll!
We will see how BDOS & Morphie Park go this year. Edwardstown were mid range in SFL in 2015 and mid-range in Div 4 in 2016. Are you saying Div 4 is diabolical? From what I am told there is a good standard of football played at that level, unless of course your only football knowledge comes from watching AFL on TV and use that fully professional competition as your benchmark.
Sadly it wasn't a troll LGIL. You're either a terrible judge or vision impaired
Clearly you've not watched divvy 1 or divvy 2 of the ammos or the Hills divvy 1 or the Great Southern or the Barossa or other country leagues
I rate them divvy 1 of the ammos clearly then the Barossa. I then put Hills divvy 1, Great Southern and Divvy 2 of the ammos all the same level
Only the first 3 or 4 sides in the SFL would be competitive in any of those leagues. Stop looking through vision impaired glasses
The North Eastern FL, Yorke Peninsula FL and River Murray are all better comps and the Kowree - Naracoorte - Tatiara FL would destroy the SFL
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:19 pm
by Ditchy » Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:55 pm
by Footy Chick » Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:58 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by am Bays » Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:10 pm
Footy Chick wrote:YOU CAN ALL STOP THROWING CHEAP SHOTS THANKS. NEXT ONE GETS A HOLIDAY
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:38 pm
Footy Chick wrote:YOU CAN ALL STOP THROWING CHEAP SHOTS THANKS. NEXT ONE GETS A HOLIDAY
by morell » Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:49 pm
Wow. Mods this ought to be an instant ban. Pretty vile.Ditchy wrote:Are you retarded or handicapped?
Oh I read it, maybe thats your problem, you're used to talking utter claptrap and people taking it in.Ditchy wrote:Throwing barbs at me without having read what I said. Read what I said and educate yourself
Read the bold bits. I made it easy for you incase it was difficult
When you've finished reading take your foot out of your gob
Ditchy wrote:What we can safely say is that the standard of the SFL is diabolical after the first 3/4 clubs
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |