by south4life » Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:39 pm
by Dutchy » Mon Nov 28, 2016 8:52 pm
by vics01 » Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:10 pm
by MatteeG » Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:18 pm
vics01 wrote:Logic behind over age players in U18 was they were not ready for senior footy.. How does reducing the age improve this or will we still have 19 year olds playing 17.5 as they are not ready for senior footy?? Saying that it appears the helicopter/cotton wool parents are to blame for 19 year olds not being ready for senior footy.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Dutchy » Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:37 pm
by Courtney Fish » Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:31 pm
Dutchy wrote:Some 17 & 18yo's could play senior footy, but at say Div 6 or 7 level in the Ammo's, the SFL B grade comp is still a very good comp amongst the top 8 clubs and not all can transition from a year out of u16's straight into it.
There are plenty of current A graders who only started playing good senior footy at 19/20.
by Courtney Fish » Mon Nov 28, 2016 11:41 pm
south4life wrote:Interesting night at SFL junior AGM with Flagstaff Hill proposing a under 16s and under 21s competition for next year. The proposal was formal and the club received it today and was brought up at the AGM for what appeared to be the first time. The main talking point was that now the under 18s is now under 17.5, that players that are 17.5 or older will not continue playing football in the league or maybe even give the game away all together. The under 21s comp would provide a comp for these players to play in until 21.
Smaller clubs wouldn't have an under 21s team given the struggle to sometimes just field a B grade team. This proposal is definitely designed for probably 3-4 clubs to retain players and stop them from going to other teams or leagues.
The league seemed to be in favour of the idea , from what I could tell from the way they were talking. It obviously makes financial sense for them as they will possibly retain more players in the league and gives them more funds for those players staying.
Obviously there is a lot to consider with this proposal but still I'd like to hear what people are thinking.
Smaller clubs wouldn't have an under 21s team given the struggle to sometimes just field a B grade team. This proposal is definitely designed for probably 3-4 clubs to retain players and stop them from going to other teams or leagues.
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Nov 29, 2016 12:19 pm
Dutchy wrote:First I've heard of the u21 proposal, however I do know of players who were playing u16's last year will now be expected to play senior footy in 2017 if they want to stay in the SFL with the new 17.5 rule. Where they can go down the hill and still play U18's.
If the SFL want to remain a strong connection from juniors to seniors they need to do something other wise players will be lost.
by Dutchy » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:40 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:57 pm
Dutchy wrote:Read my post, U16's from 2015 are now over aged next year.
by shoe boy » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:38 am
by vics01 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:37 am
SB
Give the game away?
I would of thought they just follow the natural progression to play the next level and aspire to play at the highest level possible.
As for under 21 , why not 25 then mum , dad , nanna and poppa will be happy.
by neverwas neverwillbe » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:20 am
vics01 wrote:SB
Give the game away?
I would of thought they just follow the natural progression to play the next level and aspire to play at the highest level possible.
As for under 21 , why not 25 then mum , dad , nanna and poppa will be happy.
Unfortunately SB there are a lot of Soft C**** these days who have been told by their parent for the last 17 or 18 years "You don't have to do that, everybody is a winner"
Not sense of having to achieve.
by Mister Footy » Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:40 am
by afc9798 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:17 am
Mister Footy wrote:Just heard that SFL legend and Happy Valley head trainer for the last 3 decades Hank Middleton has retired because he is seriously unwell. Reckon every club in the league has a player Hank has helped at when big injuries happen
Top bloke will be greatly missed around the club - raising a (light) beer for you Hank
![]()
![]()
by The Hound » Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:35 am
by Dutchy » Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:38 am
Mister Footy wrote:Just heard that SFL legend and Happy Valley head trainer for the last 3 decades Hank Middleton has retired because he is seriously unwell. Reckon every club in the league has a player Hank has helped at when big injuries happen
Top bloke will be greatly missed around the club - raising a (light) beer for you Hank
![]()
![]()
by Animus » Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:42 am
The Hound wrote:Wineflies losing a key forward is what I am hearing
by RFC 2010 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:59 am
Animus wrote:The Hound wrote:Wineflies losing a key forward is what I am hearing
Also Nobes from Christies to Waikerie
by Front & Centre » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:20 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |