by another grub » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:05 pm
nwdfanparade wrote:I would rather have a Norwood win with a comfortable margin than a win with a "nail biting" winning margin but would be happy with a win no matter what the margin.
by UK Fan » Thu Sep 22, 2016 5:47 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Magellan wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:I know from my time with an SANFL Club in recent years the players look forward to playing the Crows and Port because it gives them an opportunity to test themselves against AFL listed players.
And the first two weeks of the finals proved that a finals quality SANFL team when matched up against a fully-fledged squad of AFL standard players fails that test dismally. I'm sure the Centrals and in particular the South players love the concept right now.
The Bulldogs and Panthers were as bad as the Crows were good. Both sides did themselves no favours in their respective games. If their players had played to their best they'd have been a lot closer or maybe even won!
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Thu Sep 22, 2016 8:57 pm
by southee » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:17 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Magellan wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:I know from my time with an SANFL Club in recent years the players look forward to playing the Crows and Port because it gives them an opportunity to test themselves against AFL listed players.
And the first two weeks of the finals proved that a finals quality SANFL team when matched up against a fully-fledged squad of AFL standard players fails that test dismally. I'm sure the Centrals and in particular the South players love the concept right now.
The Bulldogs and Panthers were as bad as the Crows were good. Both sides did themselves no favours in their respective games. If their players had played to their best they'd have been a lot closer or maybe even won!
by Cambridge Clarrie » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:22 pm
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 22, 2016 9:31 pm
southee wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Magellan wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:I know from my time with an SANFL Club in recent years the players look forward to playing the Crows and Port because it gives them an opportunity to test themselves against AFL listed players.
And the first two weeks of the finals proved that a finals quality SANFL team when matched up against a fully-fledged squad of AFL standard players fails that test dismally. I'm sure the Centrals and in particular the South players love the concept right now.
The Bulldogs and Panthers were as bad as the Crows were good. Both sides did themselves no favours in their respective games. If their players had played to their best they'd have been a lot closer or maybe even won!
I think we all know that South and Central played a completely different Crows ressies side than the one Sturt came up against in their final. This included a Crows ressie side who had no interest in going further into GF which was pretty obvious in the preliminary final.
South's mistake was they should of beaten Sturt in the qualifying final.
by Spargo » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:12 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Those grapes are pretty sour aren't they Southee...
You'd have been lucky to beat the Kenilworth B grade playing the way you did against Adelaide.
by Dogs72 » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:21 pm
Cambridge Clarrie wrote:My pleasure. The average IQ on this thread is pretty low, so perhaps not obvious to all...
What'll you all talk about next season when the Crows and Power 2nds fail to make the finals???
by therisingblues » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:38 pm
Dogs72 wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:My pleasure. The average IQ on this thread is pretty low, so perhaps not obvious to all...
What'll you all talk about next season when the Crows and Power 2nds fail to make the finals???
Well one of them has made it each year so far. They might both make it next year, who knows and not the main point. What some on here fail to comprehend, is this thread wasn't started after Port made the GF in 2014, or after the Crows made the finals this year. We've been talking about this, the worst decision in SANFL history, before they entered and very week since their entry.
by Reddeer » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:50 pm
therisingblues wrote:Dogs72 wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:My pleasure. The average IQ on this thread is pretty low, so perhaps not obvious to all...
What'll you all talk about next season when the Crows and Power 2nds fail to make the finals???
Well one of them has made it each year so far. They might both make it next year, who knows and not the main point. What some on here fail to comprehend, is this thread wasn't started after Port made the GF in 2014, or after the Crows made the finals this year. We've been talking about this, the worst decision in SANFL history, before they entered and very week since their entry.
Exactly.
Our gripe is with their very existence in our league. Any success they have while sucking the blood out of our great comp is all insult to injury. Having said that, just about ANYTHING they do while sucking the blood out of our great comp is all insult to injury. This includes not trying, resting key players mid-game for duties in another league, coaches leaving mid-game because they have better things to do, consistent lack of atmosphere, lack of support from their fans, broken promises about promotion, saturating what media space should be devoted to our great comp with boring chatter about individuals showing promise in the reserves, moving games for their convenience, ridiculous scheduling of byes to satisfy their selfish fat bellies after they have gobbled up every other benefit that dared be noticed by their greedy want-everything-all-the-time tiny little brains... and the whole bloody time we just want them to bugger off and leave the competition untainted by their gerrymandering, meddling, contriving, inconsistent and mostly ignorant tampering of the game of football.
The SANFL is a completely different shape to the hole the AFL wants to jam it in, but they are too stupid or oblivious to understand that.
by csbowes » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:03 am
Spargo wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Those grapes are pretty sour aren't they Southee...
You'd have been lucky to beat the Kenilworth B grade playing the way you did against Adelaide.
Southee only stated factual points which you're clearly missing.
You had your chance to give South a bit of stick after you won the Qualifying Final. Hanging shit on them now with what has transpired is really poor form.
by therisingblues » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:43 am
csbowes wrote:Spargo wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Those grapes are pretty sour aren't they Southee...
You'd have been lucky to beat the Kenilworth B grade playing the way you did against Adelaide.
Southee only stated factual points which you're clearly missing.
You had your chance to give South a bit of stick after you won the Qualifying Final. Hanging shit on them now with what has transpired is really poor form.
I don't disagree with what Southee wrote, but...
... supposition is not fact mate.
Southee expressed an opinion.
by Cambridge Clarrie » Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:18 pm
southee wrote:Cambridge Clarrie wrote:Magellan wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:I know from my time with an SANFL Club in recent years the players look forward to playing the Crows and Port because it gives them an opportunity to test themselves against AFL listed players.
And the first two weeks of the finals proved that a finals quality SANFL team when matched up against a fully-fledged squad of AFL standard players fails that test dismally. I'm sure the Centrals and in particular the South players love the concept right now.
The Bulldogs and Panthers were as bad as the Crows were good. Both sides did themselves no favours in their respective games. If their players had played to their best they'd have been a lot closer or maybe even won!
I think we all know that South and Central played a completely different Crows ressies side than the one Sturt came up against in their final. This included a Crows ressie side who had no interest in going further into GF which was pretty obvious in the preliminary final.
South's mistake was they should of beaten Sturt in the qualifying final.
by heater31 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:35 pm
by hollywood7477 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:05 pm
by Dogwatcher » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:07 pm
by therisingblues » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:40 pm
hollywood7477 wrote:
There is no way a player is going to not try in a Prelim Final. Ask any player if they had a chance to play in a GF would they have a crack. Saying the Crows players didn't try is crap. May aswell investigate them for bringing the game into disrepute. a few people careers could be ended if what you all say is true.
by hollywood7477 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:54 pm
therisingblues wrote:hollywood7477 wrote:
There is no way a player is going to not try in a Prelim Final. Ask any player if they had a chance to play in a GF would they have a crack. Saying the Crows players didn't try is crap. May aswell investigate them for bringing the game into disrepute. a few people careers could be ended if what you all say is true.
What I said is that I'm not sure how hard they tried. The reason I'm not sure is that a reserves side is, by definition, a support to the league side. If the league side is no longer playing... You join the dots, and if you don't at least arrive at a question then I'd say you just haven't thought about it.
BTW, why is the SANFL grand final the week before the AFL and not in its successful week after slot?
by cracka » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:27 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:51 pm
cracka wrote:Just wondering, if reserves side don't give a sh!t when the league side gets knocked out, how come Norwood & North were playing in the SANFL reserves prelim when neither of their league sides even made the finals.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |