by felicity shagwell » Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:57 pm
by duncs7 » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:12 pm
felicity shagwell wrote:How is it that the whole second page of my thread has degenerated into some crazy macho attempt to outdo each other?!
Go and have your argument somewhere else... this topic wasn't boring until you lot started sledging each other...
by duncs7 » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:27 pm
by MUNGO JERRY » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:14 pm
felicity shagwell wrote:How is it that the whole second page of my thread has degenerated into some crazy macho attempt to outdo each other?!
Go and have your argument somewhere else... this topic wasn't boring until you lot started sledging each other...
by Dog_ger » Tue Feb 28, 2006 8:35 pm
by felicity shagwell » Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:35 pm
duncs7 wrote:What are u talkin about? Every topic ends up in a sledge match somehow.
duncs7 wrote:What i really want to know is are u as hot as the real F.Shagwell?
If yes can i have ur number immediatly?
Dog_ger wrote:Shagwell could be Shagbad....?
by duncs7 » Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:46 pm
felicity shagwell wrote:duncs7 wrote:What are u talkin about? Every topic ends up in a sledge match somehow.
If the sledge match is relevant to the topic, then it's not a problem.
Irrelevant sledging is just annoying.duncs7 wrote:What i really want to know is are u as hot as the real F.Shagwell?
If yes can i have ur number immediatly?
Yes, and no. I thought about giving you my number, but unfortunately your incorrect spelling has been detrimental to your chances of meeting the hotter Shagwell. When in Sledgeland, do as the Sledgers do...Dog_ger wrote:Shagwell could be Shagbad....?
Shagwell by name, Shag-very-well by reputation... I've never had any complaints, but plenty of compliments...
by felicity shagwell » Tue Feb 28, 2006 11:34 pm
duncs7 wrote:Usually any1 who talks themselves up like that on a forum or chatroom actually turn out 2 be a skanky trollup with a sexy avatar to create a illusion.
by Booney » Wed Mar 01, 2006 6:56 am
by Booney » Wed Mar 01, 2006 7:08 am
by - » Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:41 am
duncs7 wrote:This line has never failed to get me laid within the hour of saying it
"We dont need to have sex tonight, i will wait as long as u want, u are well worth the wait"
Im tellin ya boyz it works a treat.
by - » Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:43 am
mick wrote:It used to be three chances to "come good", then the old heave ho if not
by - » Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:01 am
Punk Rooster wrote:I don't think you can have a blanket ruling for this, each situation & circumstance is different. I met a my last g/f in town, we spent the night partying on, we went "home" the first night (with her friend, & no, dammit!:x), she stayed for an hour.
We then spent a whole night together talking, & had our first kiss (our second meeting), & the next night, we went out for tea. After tea, we spent some more time cuddling & kissing. At this point, we discussed "when would the right time to have sex be?" We decided not to, saying that it would happen when it was meant to happen. Half hour later, I'd opened my account.
My point is though, we were concious of not rushing things, it was the 3rd "date" , & we felt the time was right. We ended up getting engaged, but it didn't work out. I think denying sex, is only there to ascertain as to whether someone is after a one-nighter, or the long haul. If you both decide your ready to give a relationship a go, then I think your ready to be sexual with that person.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:15 am
by JK » Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:02 am
- wrote: The real test comes after sex when you need to be able to enjoy each others company and be motivated to spend time together without the possibility of sex.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:11 am
Yes, this conversation might be a bit beyond you, requires a degree of maturity. Have a crack at posting on the Snouts site then, SheikSheik Yerbouti wrote:I honestly worry about the North supporting people I talk to at the footy sometimes.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Punk Rooster » Wed Mar 01, 2006 11:26 am
Yes, that's- wrote:mick wrote:It used to be three chances to "come good", then the old heave ho if not
Classic
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Peter Falconia » Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:27 pm
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:I honestly worry about the North supporting people I talk to at the footy sometimes.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:03 pm
Peter Falconia wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:I honestly worry about the North supporting people I talk to at the footy sometimes.
It is quite sickening actually. I think they are getting the words Sex and Love mixed up. Kissing, cuddling and respect should never be used in relation to sex.
p.s. If ya havn't ************** her by the 2nd date...........release her back to the herd.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:33 pm
especially ones about grown men crying- hang on, they already can...Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Peter Falconia wrote:Sheik Yerbouti wrote:I honestly worry about the North supporting people I talk to at the footy sometimes.
It is quite sickening actually. I think they are getting the words Sex and Love mixed up. Kissing, cuddling and respect should never be used in relation to sex.
p.s. If ya havn't ************** her by the 2nd date...........release her back to the herd.
Actually getting some of the crap sprouted on here from some of our underlings printed up & having it plastered to the Taj for all to behold Pete, should be a good laugh when the Springton crew have a read.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |