Robb_Stark wrote:Woodville South will be pissed they got rolled by brahma on the weekend i dont think any team would want to bump into woods the following week
You just worry about planning for D7 next year buddy
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 3:42 pm
Robb_Stark wrote:Woodville South will be pissed they got rolled by brahma on the weekend i dont think any team would want to bump into woods the following week
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Q. » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:22 pm
Zartan wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:Woodville South will be pissed they got rolled by brahma on the weekend i dont think any team would want to bump into woods the following week
You just worry about planning for D7 next year buddy
by morell » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:50 pm
by human_torpedo » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:57 pm
morell wrote:Houghton would be pretty short priced favourites to stay up, shirley.
by morell » Wed Aug 03, 2016 4:59 pm
by human_torpedo » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:00 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:10 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by morell » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:12 pm
by The Bedge » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:16 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by BZB27 » Wed Aug 03, 2016 5:46 pm
Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).
Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan and Bray were useless.
Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
by the milky bar kid » Wed Aug 03, 2016 6:08 pm
BZB27 wrote:Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).
Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan and Bray were useless.
Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
I had a stinker on the weekend.
by Computer Crashed » Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:44 pm
Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).
Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless.
Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
by old farmer » Wed Aug 03, 2016 9:43 pm
Computer Crashed wrote:Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).
Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless.
Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
Vanders for the medal I reckon.
by Arch44 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 12:04 am
human_torpedo wrote:All I want from Saturday is for there to be a chocolate donut left in the Houghton canteen when I arrive..
by Computer Crashed » Thu Aug 04, 2016 6:00 am
old farmer wrote:Computer Crashed wrote:Zartan wrote:Just my observation from Saturday.. they had some handy sorts in their side, but the depth was severely lacking. Keetch, McMurtrie and Vandermoer seemed to be doing a large amount of the work, Schutz was good as usual - but not as good as I've seen him (to be expected returning from injury though).
Schneider was alright but Roling and Dolan were useless.
Too few contributors and a lot of blokes who looked out of their depth in A grade.. Obviously better suited to their ground, but 'Roys oval is around the same size and I think they'll have too much zip around the ground for the bulky Raiders.
Vanders for the medal I reckon.
Gee you Pooraka boys stick together. Robb Stark runner up too CC.
What about the young lad at IF that kicked 7 on the weekend. Rate him at all CC.
by adr107 » Thu Aug 04, 2016 9:02 am
Arch44 wrote:human_torpedo wrote:All I want from Saturday is for there to be a chocolate donut left in the Houghton canteen when I arrive..
Unlikely with me there
by Q. » Thu Aug 04, 2016 10:28 am
Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.
by The Bedge » Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:11 am
Q. wrote:Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.
Would be nice, But could be a bit tough polling big with only six wins for the year.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Computer Crashed » Thu Aug 04, 2016 11:25 am
Zartan wrote:Q. wrote:Computer Crashed wrote:Vanders for the medal I reckon.
Would be nice, But could be a bit tough polling big with only six wins for the year.
Not out of the question though. Bit like Grant Hawksworth one season at Ingle Farm - side got flogged each week by 150+ and didn't win a game, and he finished top 3 or so in the count.. picked up a lot of 2nd and 3rd preference votes.
Strong sides like WS & WC have good depth, you'd think they would have a good spread of vote getters, which may affect individual medal chances - where as someone like Vanders will be a stand out in a losing side, and likely very dominant in a winning side - every chance he could poll 20 votes and win the medal..
by Robb_Stark » Fri Aug 05, 2016 9:36 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |