by Cheese Twisties » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:03 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:05 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by The Bedge » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:07 pm
Cheese Twisties wrote:A few pages back someone mentioned something about the old "SAAFL North and South" divisions. Can any history buffs tell me how long ago this was a thing, and why it fell over? Where was the boundary that split north and south etc.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:10 pm
Zartan wrote:Cheese Twisties wrote:A few pages back someone mentioned something about the old "SAAFL North and South" divisions. Can any history buffs tell me how long ago this was a thing, and why it fell over? Where was the boundary that split north and south etc.
I have no idea, but I do recall when I started playing senior footy there was North/South in Divs 8/9/10 from memory![]()
That was late early 2000's and from memory lasted until around about the time Edwardstown headed back to SFL?
Then again the old memory isn't what it used to be (thank you beer)
*edit* think the north/south divs were effectively all C grade sides, when ultimately turned into C1-C6 we have now.
by Executive Member » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:13 pm
Footy Chick wrote:@Executive Member, care to provide any light here? In theory of course...
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:17 pm
jo172 wrote:Read the end of the CEO's Letter.
What does this mean? Sounds like they've got wind of something that might grease the wheels for everyone and the above is the worst case scenario?
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:17 pm
jo172 wrote:Read the end of the CEO's Letter.
What does this mean? Sounds like they've got wind of something that might grease the wheels for everyone and the above is the worst case scenario?
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:33 pm
jo172 wrote:Read the end of the CEO's Letter.
What does this mean? Sounds like they've got wind of something that might grease the wheels for everyone and the above is the worst case scenario?
by coman » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:54 pm
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:56 pm
coman wrote:I'm all for the CDFA comp to reunite, then we could introduce a couple of new yearly awards,like who's got the best tatt,the mouthy supporter award,and the shittiest Bgrade umpire trothy,or we can throw in best mullet.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:01 pm
coman wrote:I'm all for the CDFA comp to reunite, then we could introduce a couple of new yearly awards,like who's got the best tatt,the mouthy supporter award,and the shittiest Bgrade umpire trophy,or we can throw in best mullet.
by Executive Member » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:03 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:coman wrote:I'm all for the CDFA comp to reunite, then we could introduce a couple of new yearly awards,like who's got the best tatt,the mouthy supporter award,and the shittiest Bgrade umpire trophy,or we can throw in best mullet.
On Grand Final day they could have the fattest supporter goal to goal sprint.
by Robran » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:04 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:coman wrote:I'm all for the CDFA comp to reunite, then we could introduce a couple of new yearly awards,like who's got the best tatt,the mouthy supporter award,and the shittiest Bgrade umpire trophy,or we can throw in best mullet.
On Grand Final day they could have the fattest supporter goal to goal sprint.
by Pag » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:14 pm
Executive Member wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:coman wrote:I'm all for the CDFA comp to reunite, then we could introduce a couple of new yearly awards,like who's got the best tatt,the mouthy supporter award,and the shittiest Bgrade umpire trophy,or we can throw in best mullet.
On Grand Final day they could have the fattest supporter goal to goal sprint.
No contest, The Units legendary brothers would win that hands down
by mighty hounds » Wed Jul 20, 2016 4:58 pm
by Pag » Wed Jul 20, 2016 5:00 pm
mighty hounds wrote:Just a thought. If Brighton don't get the majority vote, could they still promote and relegate the 2 teams from div 5 & 3 keeping it at 9 teams and then just add in Morphettville Park?
by Footy Chick » Wed Jul 20, 2016 5:31 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Wedgie » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:08 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by vics01 » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:24 pm
by marbles » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:27 pm
vics01 wrote:Very poor excuse by the SAAFL to not take Hackham.. The Coach and club have worked very hard to rebuild. The problem children have been given marching orders and are either playing elsewhere this year or not playing at all.
They are now basically just a group of young kids who are there playing for the right reasons. (Most could not punch their way out of a wet paper bag)
Tend to think there may well be other reasons behind the decision not to take the Hawks..
Does pose a problem for the SFL though.. The brilliant idea of 2 divisions 10 in div 1 and 4 in div 2 will go out the window with Roos and Bombers leaving. Will mean 12 teams remain at a guess I would say 2 will not be there in the next 24 months.. Very sad for football but a positive for soccer as they will probably take over the venues and continue to grow.
Shame on the SAAFL board no real due diligence done with regard to where the club is at.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |