 by Bluedemon » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:03 am
by Bluedemon » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:03 am 

 
 
                
                
 by stan » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:29 am
by stan » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:29 am 
Bluedemon wrote:When is the tribunal sitting?
 by LaughingKookaburra » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:35 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:35 am 
 
 
                
                 
                
                 by Mr Beefy » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:37 am
by Mr Beefy » Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:37 am 
 by stan » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:33 am
by stan » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:33 am 
LaughingKookaburra wrote:I haven't got the slightest clue initially but wouldn't the tribunal take a back seat initially until it's fully investigated and there is an outcome from higher authorities? Hate to jump the gun before all facts come out...
 by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:16 am
by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 9:16 am 
 by Arch44 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:02 am
by Arch44 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:02 am 
Robbo14 wrote:http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/local-footy-sa/amateur/umpire-struck-rosewater-footballer-adam-rumbelow-may-face-life-ban-if-guilty/news-story/d1c060a08b4b7ba270183fab7ec6cca3
Going by the images of Trewartha, doesn't look good.

 by retired60 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:04 am
by retired60 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:04 am 
 by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:25 am
by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:25 am 
 by Arch44 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:51 am
by Arch44 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:51 am 
Robbo14 wrote:Arch, Google "Trewartha umpire" click on the images and then you'll be able to read the article.
 by Spangas » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:10 pm
by Spangas » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:10 pm 
Arch44 wrote:Robbo14 wrote:Arch, Google "Trewartha umpire" click on the images and then you'll be able to read the article.
Cheers mate. That picture is not from a "Grab"
 by oldman » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:32 pm
by oldman » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:32 pm 
 by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:47 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:47 pm 
oldman wrote:Stripping the club of its points would actually have a massive effect as it could mean possible relegation for them being so late in the season. That would send a pretty strong message that the league has zero tolerance for such behaviour?
Considering this same club had a player suspended in the finals last season for striking with an elbow which resulted in a broken jaw and the suspended player being deregistered due to too many suspensions........maybe the message isn't getting through??

 by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:50 pm
by Robbo14 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:50 pm 
 by Footy Chick » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:52 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:52 pm 
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view

 
 
                
                 
                
                 by jo172 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:52 pm
by jo172 » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:52 pm 
Robbo14 wrote:Has there been any other incidents in the past where an individual's actions has resulted in the team losing points?
 by oldman » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:53 pm
by oldman » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:53 pm 
Lightning McQueen wrote:oldman wrote:Stripping the club of its points would actually have a massive effect as it could mean possible relegation for them being so late in the season. That would send a pretty strong message that the league has zero tolerance for such behaviour?
Considering this same club had a player suspended in the finals last season for striking with an elbow which resulted in a broken jaw and the suspended player being deregistered due to too many suspensions........maybe the message isn't getting through??
I fail to see how a forced relegation benefits anyone, it doesn't help opposition clubs who have to front them after being very competitive in div. 5 and generally being around the mark, it doesn't help the league with potential lop-sided results and I don't see how Rosewater could be held accountable in this instance.
Sure, a strong message needs to be sent, any punishment on the club going forward will not hinder the player in question, it's unlikely that he'll play again and at a guess he probably wouldn't be spending too much time around the club in the near future.
 by Fricky » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:55 pm
by Fricky » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:55 pm 
Lightning McQueen wrote:oldman wrote:Stripping the club of its points would actually have a massive effect as it could mean possible relegation for them being so late in the season. That would send a pretty strong message that the league has zero tolerance for such behaviour?
Considering this same club had a player suspended in the finals last season for striking with an elbow which resulted in a broken jaw and the suspended player being deregistered due to too many suspensions........maybe the message isn't getting through??
I fail to see how a forced relegation benefits anyone, it doesn't help opposition clubs who have to front them after being very competitive in div. 5 and generally being around the mark, it doesn't help the league with potential lop-sided results and I don't see how Rosewater could be held accountable in this instance.
Sure, a strong message needs to be sent, any punishment on the club going forward will not hinder the player in question, it's unlikely that he'll play again and at a guess he probably wouldn't be spending too much time around the club in the near future.
 by whufc » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:57 pm
by whufc » Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:57 pm 
Lightning McQueen wrote:oldman wrote:Stripping the club of its points would actually have a massive effect as it could mean possible relegation for them being so late in the season. That would send a pretty strong message that the league has zero tolerance for such behaviour?
Considering this same club had a player suspended in the finals last season for striking with an elbow which resulted in a broken jaw and the suspended player being deregistered due to too many suspensions........maybe the message isn't getting through??
I fail to see how a forced relegation benefits anyone, it doesn't help opposition clubs who have to front them after being very competitive in div. 5 and generally being around the mark, it doesn't help the league with potential lop-sided results and I don't see how Rosewater could be held accountable in this instance.
Sure, a strong message needs to be sent, any punishment on the club going forward will not hinder the player in question, it's unlikely that he'll play again and at a guess he probably wouldn't be spending too much time around the club in the near future.
 Football
 Football  Other Footy Leagues
 Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League
 Adelaide Footy League
	
	
                                                        Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |
                                                        

