by The Bedge » Wed Jul 06, 2016 5:31 pm
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by marbles » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:24 pm
by Yank Man » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:27 pm
Zartan wrote:So in a nutshell, new clubs will be graded where the league believes in best interests at the expense of the runner up from the division below OR 8th placed side in that division if they reach an agreement with the runner up?
by The Bedge » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:34 pm
Yank Man wrote:Zartan wrote:So in a nutshell, new clubs will be graded where the league believes in best interests at the expense of the runner up from the division below OR 8th placed side in that division if they reach an agreement with the runner up?
Personally I think we should embrace it. I'm sure the league will do due diligence and ensure entry is not only fair to all but listen to our clubs concerns, as they did with Edwardstown and frankly they got that one very right. Top 4 SFL are at least Div 2, 5-8 are Div 3 to Div 4, depending on their SFL status and 9 to bottom are Div 6/7.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by tigerpie » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:48 pm
by Yank Man » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:58 pm
Zartan wrote:Yank Man wrote:Zartan wrote:So in a nutshell, new clubs will be graded where the league believes in best interests at the expense of the runner up from the division below OR 8th placed side in that division if they reach an agreement with the runner up?
Personally I think we should embrace it. I'm sure the league will do due diligence and ensure entry is not only fair to all but listen to our clubs concerns, as they did with Edwardstown and frankly they got that one very right. Top 4 SFL are at least Div 2, 5-8 are Div 3 to Div 4, depending on their SFL status and 9 to bottom are Div 6/7.
I agree
by carey » Wed Jul 06, 2016 8:59 pm
tigerpie wrote:Hehehe this is gonna get messy.
I feel sorry for the decision makers.
Someone's going to be upset.
I like the idea of conferences. That would work.
Still think Brighton are nuts.
by marbles » Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:35 pm
Dutchy wrote:Did Edwardstown entry upset anyone?
by tigerpie » Wed Jul 06, 2016 11:11 pm
by shoe boy » Thu Jul 07, 2016 8:21 am
by jo172 » Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:07 am
by marbles » Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:39 am
jo172 wrote:I wouldn't have thought it was all pretty simple. We need to insert likely two teams, one into Division 3, and one into Division 4 where there's already a spot. From what we've observed over the last two-three years (SW, Salisbury, Brahma, Para Hills) D3/D4 does not really suit all existing C9AFL Clubs.
Brighton come in at D3, D4 goes back to 10 teams. Easy.
by The Bedge » Thu Jul 07, 2016 9:57 am
marbles wrote:para hills current vacant spot is going to be relegated down a div to div 5
[Insert brain cells here]
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by jo172 » Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:08 am
Zartan wrote:marbles wrote:para hills current vacant spot is going to be relegated down a div to div 5
[Insert brain cells here]
Unless they keep the vacant spot in D4 and relegate the bottom two sides (9th and 8th).
by jo172 » Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:26 am
jo172 wrote:Zartan wrote:marbles wrote:para hills current vacant spot is going to be relegated down a div to div 5
[Insert brain cells here]
Unless they keep the vacant spot in D4 and relegate the bottom two sides (9th and 8th).
or not promote the losing D5 Grand Finalist.
by The Bedge » Thu Jul 07, 2016 10:33 am
jo172 wrote:(which would be really funny albeit cruel if it ended up being Heccies)
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
by Footy Chick » Thu Jul 07, 2016 2:59 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by whufc » Thu Jul 07, 2016 3:23 pm
by Demon Juke » Thu Jul 07, 2016 6:31 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |