Mickyj wrote:Columbo wrote:Pup injured his back in the warm up.
Thanks Columbo
Does Woods get double pay for two games
Probably just a $75 bonus....
by heater31 » Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:16 pm
Mickyj wrote:Columbo wrote:Pup injured his back in the warm up.
Thanks Columbo
Does Woods get double pay for two games
by Mickyj » Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:17 pm
goddy11 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Eagles by 10 goals plus [emoji20]
Unfortunately spot on the money.
Have put a line through us for the year now, we are done and dusted. Eagles would of scored 7-8 goals from the goal square today, totally inept performance.
Perfect day for footy and the atmosphere was non existent
Not sure what's happened to Norwood. On paper the squad looks ok. The reserves hammered yesterday. They were unbeaten a few weeks ago.
by UK Fan » Sun Jun 05, 2016 1:21 pm
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Gozu » Sun Jun 05, 2016 3:50 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Jun 05, 2016 4:12 pm
Gozu wrote:Crowd 2,250
by goddy11 » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:11 pm
Jim05 wrote:Gozu wrote:Crowd 2,250
That's about all we won for the day!
Easily outnumbered the Eagles supporters even with the garbage we dish up
by Reddeer » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:14 pm
Jim05 wrote:Gozu wrote:Crowd 2,250
That's about all we won for the day!
Easily outnumbered the Eagles supporters even with the garbage we dish up
by wedgetail » Sun Jun 05, 2016 9:23 pm
by arcadefire » Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:35 pm
by SimonH » Sun Jun 05, 2016 11:09 pm
If by "around packs" you mean winning the contested footy at ball ups etc, Norwood comfortably beat the Eagles in the clearances 40-28. (Without 2 of our best 3 inside players, Panos and Cachia, playing.)Mickyj wrote:By the last term I could see things Norwood were setting in place around packs just wasn't working or worth trying .
...
by Mickyj » Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:44 am
SimonH wrote:If by "around packs" you mean winning the contested footy at ball ups etc, Norwood comfortably beat the Eagles in the clearances 40-28. (Without 2 of our best 3 inside players, Panos and Cachia, playing.)Mickyj wrote:By the last term I could see things Norwood were setting in place around packs just wasn't working or worth trying .
...
What was wrong with Norwood's game could be briefly summarised as 'everything except winning clearances'.
A stunning stat for a team whose game-plan is to chip the ball short for uncontested marks and retain possession, is that the Eagles took more than twice as many marks (134-61) as Norwood. Bet that's the first time that has happened to the Legs since Bass took over in 2010. In fact, 134 marks is the most taken by any team in the SANFL this year—with the Eagles also holding the silver medal position from when they took 132 marks in R5 while smashing West. A double whammy from Norwood's perspective of not hitting team-mates on the chest when we had the footy, and also failing to man up and pressure opponents when the Eags had it.
by inside word » Mon Jun 06, 2016 2:36 pm
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 06, 2016 4:58 pm
SimonH wrote:If by "around packs" you mean winning the contested footy at ball ups etc, Norwood comfortably beat the Eagles in the clearances 40-28. (Without 2 of our best 3 inside players, Panos and Cachia, playing.)Mickyj wrote:By the last term I could see things Norwood were setting in place around packs just wasn't working or worth trying .
...
What was wrong with Norwood's game could be briefly summarised as 'everything except winning clearances'.
A stunning stat for a team whose game-plan is to chip the ball short for uncontested marks and retain possession, is that the Eagles took more than twice as many marks (134-61) as Norwood. Bet that's the first time that has happened to the Legs since Bass took over in 2010. In fact, 134 marks is the most taken by any team in the SANFL this year—with the Eagles also holding the silver medal position from when they took 132 marks in R5 while smashing West. A double whammy from Norwood's perspective of not hitting team-mates on the chest when we had the footy, and also failing to man up and pressure opponents when the Eags had it.
by therisingblues » Mon Jun 06, 2016 5:55 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:SimonH wrote:If by "around packs" you mean winning the contested footy at ball ups etc, Norwood comfortably beat the Eagles in the clearances 40-28. (Without 2 of our best 3 inside players, Panos and Cachia, playing.)Mickyj wrote:By the last term I could see things Norwood were setting in place around packs just wasn't working or worth trying .
...
What was wrong with Norwood's game could be briefly summarised as 'everything except winning clearances'.
A stunning stat for a team whose game-plan is to chip the ball short for uncontested marks and retain possession, is that the Eagles took more than twice as many marks (134-61) as Norwood. Bet that's the first time that has happened to the Legs since Bass took over in 2010. In fact, 134 marks is the most taken by any team in the SANFL this year—with the Eagles also holding the silver medal position from when they took 132 marks in R5 while smashing West. A double whammy from Norwood's perspective of not hitting team-mates on the chest when we had the footy, and also failing to man up and pressure opponents when the Eags had it.
Sounds like a real mess.
regards,
REB
by JK » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:56 pm
therisingblues wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:SimonH wrote:If by "around packs" you mean winning the contested footy at ball ups etc, Norwood comfortably beat the Eagles in the clearances 40-28. (Without 2 of our best 3 inside players, Panos and Cachia, playing.)Mickyj wrote:By the last term I could see things Norwood were setting in place around packs just wasn't working or worth trying .
...
What was wrong with Norwood's game could be briefly summarised as 'everything except winning clearances'.
A stunning stat for a team whose game-plan is to chip the ball short for uncontested marks and retain possession, is that the Eagles took more than twice as many marks (134-61) as Norwood. Bet that's the first time that has happened to the Legs since Bass took over in 2010. In fact, 134 marks is the most taken by any team in the SANFL this year—with the Eagles also holding the silver medal position from when they took 132 marks in R5 while smashing West. A double whammy from Norwood's perspective of not hitting team-mates on the chest when we had the footy, and also failing to man up and pressure opponents when the Eags had it.
Sounds like a real mess.
regards,
REB
The return of the Norwood we know and love.
by SpionKopster » Tue Jun 07, 2016 5:38 am
UK Fan wrote:Ben Warren = Dead Man Walking
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jun 07, 2016 12:50 pm
therisingblues wrote:The return of the Norwood we know and love.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |