The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

All discussions to do with the SANFL
Post Reply
User avatar
DOC
Coach
Posts: 20240
Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 6:45 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Has thanked: 934 times
Been thanked: 2496 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by DOC »

AFL-SA wrote:]

The Directors are too scared to take on AFL-SA, regardless of the constitution, because AFL-SA hold the financial keys to their survival. Unless this changes, sore arses all around.


Who would that be?
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has thanked: 756 times
Been thanked: 1516 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Magellan »

UK Fan wrote:Why when They don't have to take on anyone to get the scum out.

Read ruccis article today. What an unbiased piece covering the real issues of SA football :-)

The crows promised 3000 appparently :-)

Rucci reckons that the Crows have pretty much satisfied their promise of 3,000 people per game because on average this year each Ravens' match has attracted an average of 2,900-odd.

But I recall that they were going to bring an additional 3,000 (or was it 4,000, IIRC?) Crows fans to games, that is, on top of the existing proper fans from the opposition. This means more than 3,000 people. On this basis the Crows have failed.

Anyone know the crowd for today's game against Glenelg?
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
User avatar
scott
Veteran
Posts: 3760
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:23 pm
Team: South Adelaide
Location: Noarlunga Oval
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 124 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by scott »

IIRC 3,600-something.
User avatar
RB
Coach
Posts: 6639
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 3:15 pm
Has thanked: 931 times
Been thanked: 1392 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by RB »

Magellan wrote:
UK Fan wrote:Why when They don't have to take on anyone to get the scum out.

Read ruccis article today. What an unbiased piece covering the real issues of SA football :-)

The crows promised 3000 appparently :-)

Rucci reckons that the Crows have pretty much satisfied their promise of 3,000 people per game because on average this year each Ravens' match has attracted an average of 2,900-odd.

But I recall that they were going to bring an additional 3,000 (or was it 4,000, IIRC?) Crows fans to games, that is, on top of the existing proper fans from the opposition. This means more than 3,000 people. On this basis the Crows have failed.

Anyone know the crowd for today's game against Glenelg?

Chapman definitely promised 4,000 Crows fans.
R.I.P. the SANFL 1877 - 2013
matt35
Under 18s
Posts: 648
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:20 pm
Team: Glenelg
Team: Adelaide Crows
Team: Boston
Location: Darwin
Has thanked: 513 times
Been thanked: 51 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by matt35 »

Crowd today from memory was 3,787.
No Surrender!
UK Fan
Coach
Posts: 6366
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:11 am
Team: Central District
Has thanked: 1374 times
Been thanked: 602 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by UK Fan »

RB wrote:
Magellan wrote:
UK Fan wrote:Why when They don't have to take on anyone to get the scum out.

Read ruccis article today. What an unbiased piece covering the real issues of SA football :-)

The crows promised 3000 appparently :-)

Rucci reckons that the Crows have pretty much satisfied their promise of 3,000 people per game because on average this year each Ravens' match has attracted an average of 2,900-odd.

But I recall that they were going to bring an additional 3,000 (or was it 4,000, IIRC?) Crows fans to games, that is, on top of the existing proper fans from the opposition. This means more than 3,000 people. On this basis the Crows have failed.

Anyone know the crowd for today's game against Glenelg?

Chapman definitely promised 4,000 Crows fans.


And so did Burtenshaw repeatedly
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!



MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.


Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.


THE SKY HAS FALLEN!!!!
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
Posts: 14138
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:05 am
Team: Norwood
Been thanked: 686 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Gozu »

It appears to have already been mentioned but for the record:

A growing group of SANFL clubs is eager to pull the pin on AFL reserves in the State league. The push is on to return to the 2013 model in which all AFL players who earn senior selection at Adelaide and Port Adelaide are farmed to their original SANFL clubs or the teams they are assigned in the so-called SANFL mini-draft.


CROWDS: Adelaide’s submission to the SANFL declared a Crows reserves team would bring an average 3000 through the turnstiles. This season the figures are: 2162 at West Adelaide’s unfurling of the 2015 SANFL flag at Richmond; 2323 at the SANFL Showdown at Mannum; and 4252 against Woodville-West Torrens at Oval Avenue.

The average is: 2912. This not far from the 3000 promised by the Crows who play no home games and allow SANFL clubs to collect all the spoils from their games. But there is the concern for the Crows have no SANFL supporter base — a difficulty considering virtually every Crows fan has an SANFL allegiance.


FAIRNESS: SANFL diehards take issue with how their teams are asked to compete with a total wage bill that can be less than the cheque handed to one AFL star playing in the State league.

So far, in a reassuring note that money does not buy SANFL flags, the past two State league premierships have been won by traditionally formed teams at Norwood and West Adelaide. Only one AFL reserves team — Port Adelaide in 2014 — has reached the grand final at Adelaide Oval.


TELEVISION: Channel Seven is far from a lock to screen the SANFL’s million-dollar investment in live telecasts of “match of the week” next year. Channel Nine may be interested. But if there is no guaranteed television partner for the SANFL, the debate on keeping AFL reserves teams in the State league changes dramatically — to kick them out.


http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 30e164812b
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has thanked: 756 times
Been thanked: 1516 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Magellan »

I'll stand to be corrected (since I have to pay to read it again), but IIRC Rucci's list of issues with the reserves sides ignored the most important point - the integrity of the comp. Not that there's anything surprising about that.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
sib
Rookie
Posts: 245
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:59 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Adelaide Crows
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 26 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by sib »

The SANFL clubs can have as many meetings as they want but Crows and Power wont allow it to go back to the old system. Crows worked too hard to get their reserves side. They will leave all together if forced to choose and go to VFL or Amatuers League
Jim05
Coach
Posts: 49466
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:33 pm
Team: Norwood
Team: Essendon
Team: South Gawler
Has thanked: 1137 times
Been thanked: 4041 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Jim05 »

sib wrote:The SANFL clubs can have as many meetings as they want but Crows and Power wont allow it to go back to the old system. Crows worked too hard to get their reserves side. They will leave all together if forced to choose and go to VFL or Amatuers League

Good, don't let the door hit them on the way out!
User avatar
Magellan
Coach
Posts: 5981
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Team: North Adelaide
Location: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Has thanked: 756 times
Been thanked: 1516 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Magellan »

Jim05 wrote:
sib wrote:Crows worked too hard to get their reserves side.

Damn right they did. It takes a helluva lot of effort to think up a bunch of nonsense you don't really believe in, and then try to convince everyone til you're blue in the face that it's true.
"Religion is like a blind man looking in a black room for a black cat that isn't there...and finding it." - Oscar Wilde
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Reddeer »

Jim05 wrote:
sib wrote:The SANFL clubs can have as many meetings as they want but Crows and Power wont allow it to go back to the old system. Crows worked too hard to get their reserves side. They will leave all together if forced to choose and go to VFL or Amatuers League

Good, don't let the door hit them on the way out!

Agree
They wont even consider making the comp slightly LEVEL by restricting the AFL numbers to about 13/14 and also I reckon that their players should be ineligible to play against the team from whom they were recruited i.e. Grigg v Norwood, etc
Verschrikkelyk!!
Kahuna
League - Top 5
Posts: 2634
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 9:45 pm
Team: Central District
Team: Melbourne
Has thanked: 604 times
Been thanked: 226 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Kahuna »

sib wrote: They will leave all together if forced to choose and go to VFL


Struggling to find a down side to that.
VALE PARK
Under 18s
Posts: 660
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:02 am
Team: Melbourne
Team: Goodwood Saints
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 59 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by VALE PARK »

RESIST THE OCCUPATION!
Last edited by VALE PARK on Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Reddeer »

Magellan wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
sib wrote:Crows worked too hard to get their reserves side.

Damn right they did. It takes a helluva lot of effort to think up a bunch of nonsense you don't really believe in, and then try to convince everyone til you're blue in the face that it's true.

Unfortunately it is us detractors that are BLUE IN THE FACE in trying to convince the powers that be in control to return some FAIRNESS into our comp
Verschrikkelyk!!
AFL-SA
Mini-League
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:42 pm
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by AFL-SA »

The AFL sides won't leave and AFL-SA won't entertain removing them, a compromise is the only way forward.

Hint: pressure you clubs along these lines, it's the only chance of (limited) success, think of what would satisfy AFL-SA, the AFL clubs and the SANFL clubs, this is the Holy Grail.

A simple solution staring everyone in the face is to just change one thing, the AFL sides do not receive premiership points.
Reddeer
Reserves
Posts: 768
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 83 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Reddeer »

AFL-SA wrote:The AFL sides won't leave and AFL-SA won't entertain removing them, a compromise is the only way forward.

Hint: pressure you clubs along these lines, it's the only chance of (limited) success, think of what would satisfy AFL-SA, the AFL clubs and the SANFL clubs, this is the Holy Grail.

A simple solution staring everyone in the face is to just change one thing, the AFL sides do not receive premiership points.

That just proves they are in it for only as a practice comp, completely compromises the whole thing to what it has now become.
Verschrikkelyk!!
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
Posts: 12494
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:41 am
Team: Glenelg
Team: Marion
Location: enculez-vous
Been thanked: 1712 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by Pseudo »

AFL-SA wrote:The AFL sides won't leave and AFL-SA won't entertain removing them, a compromise is the only way forward.

Hint: pressure you clubs along these lines, it's the only chance of (limited) success, think of what would satisfy AFL-SA, the AFL clubs and the SANFL clubs, this is the Holy Grail.

A simple solution staring everyone in the face is to just change one thing, the AFL sides do not receive premiership points.

You mean adopt the Pure Ladder (tm)?
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
AFL-SA
Mini-League
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 2:42 pm
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by AFL-SA »

No, that would just condone the childish actions of a few who put their personal ambitions ahead off their club's.

The SANFL clubs would still receive points for matches against AFL sides.
User avatar
therisingblues
Coach
Posts: 6190
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:20 am
Team: Sturt
Team: Carlton
Team: Hope Valley
Location: Fukuoka
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 514 times
Contact:

Re: The never ending No AFL in the SANFL whinge thread

Post by therisingblues »

That was my solution before they even entered.
BTW Pseudo, I believe I'm owed royalties from your trademark.
I'm gonna sit back, crack the top off a Pale Ale, and watch the Double Blues prevail
1915, 1919, 1926, 1932, 1940, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1974, 1976, 2002, 2016, 2017
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 244 guests