oyster wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:The Hound wrote:Would of thought that SACA would of had every scenario covered considering their financial position over the clubs. If it does go down the legal path have the clubs got the $$ to cover their expenses and if they win will they have any left over to run a club effectively?
Good point Hound. Last thing Clubs can afford is massive Legal bills, but both Clubs have high profile people helping out, so costs low at this stage.
As Gough famously said, with a slight change.
Ladies and gentlemen, well may we say 'God Save the Queen', because nothing will save the SACA board now.
None of the SACA board would've had any idea of the flak they would cop. Gladly I can say, what they've copped so far, is only a drop in the ocean to what is planned over the next few months.
Take University out of this equation.....
How do you propose Port Adelaide address their junior participation issues? They have **** all schools to draw from yet nobody wants to change anything To a lesser extent Woodville are going down the same path at Port. Redistribute the zones and it becomes a less of a problem and they move onto a bigger issue of capturing the population of Mt Barker by relocating a club up the hill.......That one is going to be costly as their is no suitable ground to locate a club up there at present.