by Bounce of the ball » Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:56 pm
by Magellan » Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Grenville wrote:The Rucci autobiography would sound like a musical birthday card, as you turn every page it lets out a nonsensical whine.
by The Apostle » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:28 am
by stan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:35 am
The Apostle wrote:Are Port supporters that retarded that they need a big sign at the Elizabeth train station telling them which way to go to get to Elizabeth Oval???
by Groucho » Sat Feb 27, 2016 3:06 pm
by Gozu » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:19 pm
by UK Fan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:25 pm
Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.
In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.
Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Gozu » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:30 pm
UK Fan wrote:So we can't even trust Olsen on terms to be "reviewed" annually.
I miss Whicker he'd of called bullshit to the entire operation upfront.
Olsen = clueless sell out
by Pseudo » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:42 pm
by tipper » Sat Feb 27, 2016 4:58 pm
by stan » Sat Feb 27, 2016 9:20 pm
UK Fan wrote:Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.
In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.
Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."
So we can't even trust Olsen on terms to be "reviewed" annually.
I miss Whicker he'd of called bullshit to the entire operation upfront.
Olsen = clueless sell out
by Reddeer » Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:53 pm
Pseudo wrote:If the brainstrusts of the respective 8 sovereign clubs had any balls then they'd simply forfeit the games against the smearpies this season. "They don't pay, we won't play".
by UK Fan » Tue Mar 08, 2016 10:51 am
Gozu wrote:A couple of articles in the Ruccitiser on Thursday, the SA Football Commission is under pressure from the 8 'traditional' SANFL clubs to start charging the Power an annual licence to play in the SANFL. The Crows pay $400K a year ($50K to each club) where as Port don't pay anything being a founding member of the SANFL in 1877. Rucci says the 8 traditional SANFL clubs want to change the 15 year agreement they signed with the two AFL clubs in 2014. Rucci says financial pressure is mounting but then again one SANFL club is reportedly paying their coach at least $150K this year.
In the other article John Olsen has supposedly blocked a move from the SANFL league directors to re-negotiate the 15 year agreement with the two AFL clubs signed in 2014. "A deal is a deal" Olsen told the Advertiser. The Crows pay the SANFL $11.326 million across the 15 years to release it's AFL licence and then $400K a year to play in the SANFL. Port Adelaide pays the SANFL $6.985 million over the 15 years for their AFL licence and then nothing to play in the SANFL. The SANFL league directors want Port to pay the same as the Crows to play in the SANFL. SANFL chief executive Jake Parkinson says the Crows pay because they have use of the facilities at Football Park free of charge and Port does not pay because their SANFL side plays out of Alberton Oval. It's only 2 years into the 15 year agreement and that was pointed out to the SANFL league directors on Tuesday night and will not be revisited.
Said Parkinson "Some clubs are making year-after-year losses we have to face up to that. We have to grow revenue. But we also have to look at the cost base."
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by teaoby » Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:05 am
by Killa » Tue Mar 08, 2016 4:23 pm
teaoby wrote:The Crows might pay the $400k but the SANFL pay close to $500k to the Crows to maintain Footy Park!
by VALE PARK » Tue Mar 08, 2016 6:21 pm
by Hazydog » Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:33 pm
by Magellan » Wed Mar 16, 2016 3:57 pm
Hazydog wrote:Crows going to be very hard to beat in the first few rounds having a full squad, bar one, available in Round 1.
by Hazydog » Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:41 pm
by sib » Thu Mar 17, 2016 1:10 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |