by stampy » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:57 am
by locky801 » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:59 am
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:59 am
by RB » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:00 pm
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:02 pm
locky801 wrote:terrible cricket Australia
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:03 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:30 pm
whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:37 pm
whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:41 pm
Dutchy wrote:whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
Agree, people say they took a wicket on a no ball, but if the ball was delivered legally who's to say there wouldn't be a different result, especially with edges which come down to millimetres.
by JK » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:49 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:54 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:56 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:58 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is poor bowling from Australia.
The bowling coach needs to take some responsibility for the actions.
but the question is also, what are the umpires doing?
how many no-balls are they missing??
its becoming lazy cricket
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:03 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
I don't get what you mean? You go over the line, you are cheating, it is a distinct advantage.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:05 pm
Dutchy wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is poor bowling from Australia.
The bowling coach needs to take some responsibility for the actions.
but the question is also, what are the umpires doing?
how many no-balls are they missing??
its becoming lazy cricket
I don't know how the umpires do it at the high level, I umpired in a Hills B grade game 3 weeks back and struggled to watch the front foot and get the eyes up to watch the ball flight quick enough, let alone someone bowling twice as quick.
Simple answer is get the 3rd umpire to watch every front foot for every ball with a light system of some sort to confirm a legal delivery.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:07 pm
whufc wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
I don't get what you mean? You go over the line, you are cheating, it is a distinct advantage.
I agree!!!
What im saying is I wonder why so many wickets fall on a no ball
Is what we have seen proof that by over stepping the mark the extra point etc etc second less the batsmen get to play the shot enough to cause a mis judgment from the batsmen!!!
Should bowleds look at this and start to use bowling from different distances in the crease as a great way to bowl a 'slower' ball etc
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:07 pm
JK wrote:Don't think Whoofer is disagreeing with you bud. Think what he's trying to say is that people claim wickets were lost due to no balls, but perhaps the additional cribbing might have made a difference to the batsmans ability to defend? Would think it unlikely in most cases, but noone would ever know with %100 certainty.
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:08 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:whufc wrote:Another wicket on a no ball
I'm interested if there could be the theory that the extra point whatever of a second the ball reaches the batter quicker from the lesser distance makes a huge difference
I don't get what you mean? You go over the line, you are cheating, it is a distinct advantage.
I agree!!!
What im saying is I wonder why so many wickets fall on a no ball
Is what we have seen proof that by over stepping the mark the extra point etc etc second less the batsmen get to play the shot enough to cause a mis judgment from the batsmen!!!
Should bowleds look at this and start to use bowling from different distances in the crease as a great way to bowl a 'slower' ball etc
OK, soz .
Yeah, you don't see many bowlers change where they deliver the ball form any more, some used to come wider on the crease every so often.
by whufc » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:10 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Dutchy wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:it is poor bowling from Australia.
The bowling coach needs to take some responsibility for the actions.
but the question is also, what are the umpires doing?
how many no-balls are they missing??
its becoming lazy cricket
I don't know how the umpires do it at the high level, I umpired in a Hills B grade game 3 weeks back and struggled to watch the front foot and get the eyes up to watch the ball flight quick enough, let alone someone bowling twice as quick.
Simple answer is get the 3rd umpire to watch every front foot for every ball with a light system of some sort to confirm a legal delivery.
Yep, you have an instant where you have to call or not call, I too would rather they concentrate on getting the decision right and leave the no ball call to upstairs.
Just out of interest, what happens when an umpire calls no ball and then a player is bowled, do they review it to see if he was over the line and hen reverse it? I'd think not.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Dec 29, 2015 1:17 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |