S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
That's how I've read it too.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:33 am
S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
by Executive Member » Tue Oct 27, 2015 9:40 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
That's how I've read it too.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:06 am
Executive Member wrote:
Doesn't matter as one cant happen without the other, for example Salisbury may have asked not to go up, so unless Seaton agree to staying up, Salisbury would then have no choice but to go up regardless of their wish to stay down
and vice versa
by Executive Member » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:24 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:
Doesn't matter as one cant happen without the other, for example Salisbury may have asked not to go up, so unless Seaton agree to staying up, Salisbury would then have no choice but to go up regardless of their wish to stay down
and vice versa
It does matter, it's like dumping your girlfriend at school because you knew you were about to be dumped.
by S Demon » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:47 am
Executive Member wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
That's how I've read it too.
Doesn't matter as one cant happen without the other, for example Salisbury may have asked not to go up, so unless Seaton agree to staying up, Salisbury would then have no choice but to go up regardless of their wish to stay down
and vice versa
by Q. » Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:55 am
by S Demon » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:03 am
Q. wrote:I'm told that Salisbury didn't want to put bar profits at risk by going up a Div.
by heater31 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:09 am
S Demon wrote:Q. wrote:I'm told that Salisbury didn't want to put bar profits at risk by going up a Div.
Div 3 clubs drink less beer?
by Q. » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:20 am
S Demon wrote:Q. wrote:I'm told that Salisbury didn't want to put bar profits at risk by going up a Div.
Div 3 clubs drink less beer?
by jo172 » Tue Oct 27, 2015 11:22 am
Q. wrote:S Demon wrote:Q. wrote:I'm told that Salisbury didn't want to put bar profits at risk by going up a Div.
Div 3 clubs drink less beer?
Success = bar profits
Better chance of success in D4
by Slots It Through » Tue Oct 27, 2015 12:11 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
That's how I've read it too.
by Demon Juke » Tue Oct 27, 2015 4:45 pm
Slots It Through wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:S Demon wrote:So it was Salisbury's choice then first of all, then Seaton agreed to stay up? That's different to what FC's post was alluding to
That's how I've read it too.
Salisbury were given the first option. When they declined it was offered to Seaton. If they had said no, I think it may have been offered to Edwardstown.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:02 pm
Executive Member wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Executive Member wrote:
Doesn't matter as one cant happen without the other, for example Salisbury may have asked not to go up, so unless Seaton agree to staying up, Salisbury would then have no choice but to go up regardless of their wish to stay down
and vice versa
It does matter, it's like dumping your girlfriend at school because you knew you were about to be dumped.
no idea what your on about, never happened to me mate, went to Blackfriars
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:47 am
Demon Juke wrote:
I was told Salisbury had done a deal with Seaton and this was last year at the Prem. final, I had a lot respect for Salisbury but now I am not sure. Salisbury are in a better place than Kilburn to go up, lost the grand final by a kick and the "b" grade won the premiership. I am sure we could have done a deal after we lost our last Grand final by 100points but we never thought about not going up as we are trying to play in a grade as high as we can.
by Minion Master » Wed Oct 28, 2015 10:01 am
by BZB27 » Wed Oct 28, 2015 12:33 pm
by Minion Master » Wed Oct 28, 2015 12:46 pm
BZB27 wrote:I think it has to do with the fact that salisbury for at least the last 10 years has been a top 3 team in div 4 and a bottom 3 team in div 3. I reckon they just want to steady themselves instead of all the yo-yoing
by Boosh » Wed Oct 28, 2015 1:22 pm
by Nearly Was » Wed Oct 28, 2015 1:53 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:09 pm
Nearly Was wrote:How could you play for a Club that promotes mediocrity. The thrill of being promoted is nearly as good as playing in a GF. And good players always like to try themselves against better opposition. Any player worth his salt wants to play to his optimum level. If the Club doesn't, I wouldn't want to play there.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |