by BigB » Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:30 pm
by jo172 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:36 pm
BigB wrote:He was already employed by the boss, so just part of an existing employee/employer relationship to have discussions about all manner of work related stuff. Anyway, he's a grass roots boy who loves our "country club" kind of community. And we love him too
by Mr Beefy » Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:11 pm
by morell » Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:12 pm
by jo172 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 3:18 pm
morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
by Burras » Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:35 pm
morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
by EB53 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:15 pm
jo172 wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
by heater31 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:45 pm
Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
by wonder_kid » Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:02 pm
by laser » Thu Sep 10, 2015 7:25 pm
heater31 wrote:Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
Inner city bogans more like it
by jo172 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 10:00 pm
laser wrote:heater31 wrote:Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
Inner city bogans more like it
Pretty sure we got rid of them all in a clean out last year. I'll do a quick check around the club tonight, PAC bound to have left a couple behind!
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:25 pm
laser wrote:heater31 wrote:Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
Inner city bogans more like it
Pretty sure we got rid of them all in a clean out last year. I'll do a quick check around the club tonight, PAC bound to have left a couple behind!
by Jetters » Thu Sep 10, 2015 11:45 pm
Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
by G_Leonard » Fri Sep 11, 2015 2:59 pm
Jetters wrote:Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
Get **** @Burras, you're distracting me from my media law assignment.
I think the manual labour jobs are more valuable. You are likely to entice a new player to a footy club with an apprenticeship/labouring/tradie work, you're not about to go making people firm partners on the basis of club loyalty!
Either way, isn't this exactly what we want clubs doing!? Instead of taking $$ from the clubs, facilities, juniors etc to attract recruits, use other club resources. $$ gets invested back into the club and the player gets probably a more meaningful outcome.
by G_Leonard » Fri Sep 11, 2015 3:01 pm
BigB wrote:Fantastic - you can email me if easier... comms@unleyjets.com.au
Much appreciated.
PS - anyone video the speech????
by Footy Chick » Fri Sep 11, 2015 3:05 pm
G_Leonard wrote:I think all the lawyers are at Kilburn.
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by morell » Fri Sep 11, 2015 4:15 pm
Yeah correct, my "making Partner at a law firm" jibe was hyperbole, but I know of a few Adelaide Uni players that go there because of the connections they can make, and a couple more at other clubs that are there because their boss is a club stalwart.G_Leonard wrote:Jetters wrote:Burras wrote:morell wrote:I tend to agree, but there are plenty of tradesman and what not at those clubs with traditionally lower socio-economic demographics.
So at Unley it might be that the Junior Lawyer makes Partner, at Mitchell Park it might be that the bricky gets the sub division.
I love that Unley is stereotyped as the team full of lawyers! @Jetters.... Thoughts?
Get **** @Burras, you're distracting me from my media law assignment.
I think the manual labour jobs are more valuable. You are likely to entice a new player to a footy club with an apprenticeship/labouring/tradie work, you're not about to go making people firm partners on the basis of club loyalty!
Either way, isn't this exactly what we want clubs doing!? Instead of taking $$ from the clubs, facilities, juniors etc to attract recruits, use other club resources. $$ gets invested back into the club and the player gets probably a more meaningful outcome.
I think all the lawyers are at Kilburn.
While I agree to some extent that manual labor jobs would be offered more often and easier to provide with less qualifications/experience required, I know a lot of uni graduates who would change clubs if they were offered a graduate position. It is quite a competitive graduate market in Adelaide - for graduate lawyers especially ;-)
by The Big Shrek » Fri Sep 11, 2015 7:12 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:13 am
The Big Shrek wrote:The best lawyers market is at Kilburn
by The Big Shrek » Sat Sep 12, 2015 9:19 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |