by Pseudo » Sun Sep 06, 2015 7:30 pm
by spell_check » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:14 pm
LPH wrote:Don't stop there, Lads.
Bradman & Taylor's 334 is the next milestone
by LPH » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:34 pm
by RB » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:40 pm
by spell_check » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:42 pm
RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:43 pm
by RB » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:48 pm
spell_check wrote:RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final
by mal » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:57 pm
by Mic » Sun Sep 06, 2015 8:58 pm
spell_check wrote:RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:00 pm
mal wrote:Peel Blunder
by robranisgod » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:36 pm
Mic wrote:spell_check wrote:RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final
Both were only 16 years old too!
by Mic » Sun Sep 06, 2015 9:52 pm
robranisgod wrote:Mic wrote:spell_check wrote:RB wrote:A staggering FIVE players made their debut for Peel today. In a final, for a league football team. I can think of one or two players who made their debut in a final for the Eagles (Matthew Stokes, Paul Stewart). But FIVE! Surely a record. (Spelly?)
In my records from 1983, Ben Hart and Peter Turner for North in the 1st Semi of 1990 is the only instance of two debutants in a final
Both were only 16 years old too!
And both did well that day. The only thing that puzzles most people who saw them both then and early in their career is what happened to Peter Turner. As good as Ben Hart looked and turned out to be, everyone thought that Peter Turner was the better prospect.
by johntheclaret » Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:41 am
by therisingblues » Mon Sep 07, 2015 9:29 am
by topsywaldron » Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:30 pm
therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot.
by LPH » Mon Sep 07, 2015 12:31 pm
by tipper » Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:38 pm
LPH wrote:Improve the conditions?
I would've though both the PAPs & the Cows are very happy with the current arrangement, don't you?
by Reddeer » Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:53 pm
tipper wrote:LPH wrote:Improve the conditions?
I would've though both the PAPs & the Cows are very happy with the current arrangement, don't you?
and according to the media, the sanfl spokespeople, and even some of the club delegates, that seems to be all that matters.....
by Dutchy » Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:48 pm
therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot. Obviously it'd avoid potential final round player circuses caused by AFL sides resting players. Then we still get our place in the sun by having our grand final the week after the AFL finishes, and even the preliminary final thing day after the AFL grannie provides a footy fix for those who don't want the footy season to end. Those two stand alone finals possibly also provide a hook to bring in the occasional AFL supporters to one or two sanfl games a year.
No afl in the SANFL, but in the meantime can't we at least improve the conditions of the deal?
by Reddeer » Mon Sep 07, 2015 2:56 pm
Dutchy wrote:therisingblues wrote:On top of everything else. I don't get why we can't have our final in its normal spot. Obviously it'd avoid potential final round player circuses caused by AFL sides resting players. Then we still get our place in the sun by having our grand final the week after the AFL finishes, and even the preliminary final thing day after the AFL grannie provides a footy fix for those who don't want the footy season to end. Those two stand alone finals possibly also provide a hook to bring in the occasional AFL supporters to one or two sanfl games a year.
No afl in the SANFL, but in the meantime can't we at least improve the conditions of the deal?
There was no way the AFL teams were going to come in unless the SANFL brought the final series forward. For example, this year that would make the GF 11th October and if Port made it then their AFL listed players would not come back for preseason until early December after their mandatory 8 week break, when most teams will be starting early November. SANFL bent over, simple.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |