by another grub » Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:38 pm
by Q. » Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:49 pm
another grub wrote:Everyone is entitled to thier opinion and thats what it is an opinion. No one is right and no one is wrong.
by woodublieve12 » Wed Jul 29, 2015 10:50 pm
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:45 am
Q. wrote:another grub wrote:Everyone is entitled to thier opinion and thats what it is an opinion. No one is right and no one is wrong.
Unless you're Adam Goodes, who isn't allowed an opinion and is obviously wrong.
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jul 30, 2015 8:47 am
by Booney » Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:38 am
by whufc » Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 am
Wedgie wrote:whufc wrote:cracka wrote:Did/does Stuart Broad, Wayne Carey, Hayden Ballentine & anyone else who is booed think it's because of their race though.
It would be interesting to see a poll on whether thought the booing was motivated by
-racism
-off field personality
-on field personality
-both
-other
It'd be pointless as most of the racism is either denied or sub conscious.
They'd just use the other answers as a cop out.
by whufc » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:04 am
woodublieve12 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/jul/28/adam-goodes-why-his-critics-arguments-just-dont-stack-up
by OnSong » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:11 am
whufc wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/jul/28/adam-goodes-why-his-critics-arguments-just-dont-stack-up
I reckon the author lost their credibility when she claimed it was normal to boo Milne because he was 'accused' of a crime yet booing Goodes is a no no because his committed no crime.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty
by whufc » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:14 am
OnSong wrote:whufc wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/jul/28/adam-goodes-why-his-critics-arguments-just-dont-stack-up
I reckon the author lost their credibility when she claimed it was normal to boo Milne because he was 'accused' of a crime yet booing Goodes is a no no because his committed no crime.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty
Well, Cy Walsh hasn't been convicted yet either
by OnSong » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:22 am
by cennals05 » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:25 am
whufc wrote:OnSong wrote:whufc wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/jul/28/adam-goodes-why-his-critics-arguments-just-dont-stack-up
I reckon the author lost their credibility when she claimed it was normal to boo Milne because he was 'accused' of a crime yet booing Goodes is a no no because his committed no crime.
Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty
Well, Cy Walsh hasn't been convicted yet either
Clearly not the same!!! But either way people should let the justic system run its course as in the Milne case he was proven innocent despite the fact his one of the most annoying footballers in the history of the game
by whufc » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:27 am
by Q. » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:29 am
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:44 am
woodublieve12 wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/jul/28/adam-goodes-why-his-critics-arguments-just-dont-stack-up
by bennymacca » Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:48 am
Q. wrote:Love me some First Dog:
by tipper » Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:14 am
bennymacca wrote:Q. wrote:Love me some First Dog:
funny but also sad because its true
by whufc » Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:22 am
by morell » Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:29 am
It's brilliant and I shared it on my 'book today.Q. wrote:Love me some First Dog:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/29/why-do-you-boo-adam-goodes-is-it-because-#img-1
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |