by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:41 pm
by Q. » Wed Jun 24, 2015 2:42 pm
RustyCage wrote:bennymacca wrote:Bully wrote:hey, everyone can have their opinions. Mine is they should not be allowed back, along with PLENTY of others who agree with me.
these kids were taken over there, then seen on the news holding severed heads in photos, under the guidance of their scum terrorist father. They CAN see this as ok , then come back to australia and MAYBE do the same in the future thinking its the norm .
So I'll ask you again. Should the children of murderers, rapists, child molesters be punished? They CAN see this as ok and MAYBE do the same in the future.
If they were also involved in the murder, like these kids were, then yes.
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:43 pm
bennymacca wrote:Ah, I didn't realise it was the act of posting it on social media that was the issue. Thanks for clearing that up.
Such a beautiful straw man you have constructed
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:46 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:47 pm
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:52 pm
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:57 pm
Q. wrote:Bully wrote:Q. wrote:Bully wrote:If the government allows these children of the scum that went overseas to fight for ISIS back in australia, then WE RIOT!!!
Dude, they're just kids who had no say in where they were taken.
Well i guess you are the one out of 100 people surveyed that will allow this to happen. Go onto any facebook page or social media page and see if anyone agrees with you........
The day I go to facebook for an expert opinion is the day after I have a lobotomy.
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:58 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:00 pm
Bully wrote:Q. wrote:Bully wrote:Q. wrote:[quote="Bully"]If the government allows these children of the scum that went overseas to fight for ISIS back in australia, then WE RIOT!!!
Dude, they're just kids who had no say in where they were taken.
Well i guess you are the one out of 100 people surveyed that will allow this to happen. Go onto any facebook page or social media page and see if anyone agrees with you........
The day I go to facebook for an expert opinion is the day after I have a lobotomy.
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:05 pm
bennymacca wrote:
I'm not sure what your point is? More than one person can hold delusional undemocratic and unlawful beliefs
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:07 pm
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:09 pm
by Q. » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:09 pm
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:12 pm
Q. wrote:If a child is forced into a criminal act, it shouldn't be the child who is punished.
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:14 pm
Bully wrote:Q. wrote:If a child is forced into a criminal act, it shouldn't be the child who is punished.
maybe so, maybe not. My opinion is different, and yes it is the same to others ( not saying facebook is the correct answer as you said i did mean that, maybe not those words but close to it }, but reading these pages and news reports most say they should not be let back in
I am still waiting on bennys reply on how a rapist or murder with the child not involved, is the same as a child being involved and the punishments for that
by Bully » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:18 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Jun 24, 2015 4:20 pm
by Booney » Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:14 pm
Bully wrote:lol..... its like talking to a brick wall.
by test » Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:19 pm
Booney wrote:Bully wrote:lol..... its like talking to a brick wall.
Yes, it looks as though it is and to be honest I'm not quite sure why benny and Q. are bothering.
by Q. » Wed Jun 24, 2015 5:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |