by Gozu » Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:41 am
by once_were_warriors » Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:20 pm
by kickinit » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:50 pm
Booney wrote:kickinit wrote:The evidence of the court holding out information from the jury is enough to prove which outcome the judge wanted to happen.
"The evidence of the court holding out information....."
So the judge stopped the QC ( HE STOPPED A QC!!!! ) from raising this in court to assist the police department in achieving the desired outcome, an innocent verdict. Is this what you're saying?
If so, you, young man have some very juicy information that I am sure the DPP would love to hear about. Well, you have information to suggest the judge deliberately held back information from the jury. Yes?
Or, you're full of shit.
I'd suggest you don't need to speak to the DPP.
by kickinit » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:51 pm
dedja wrote:kickinit wrote: The evidence of the court holding out information from the jury is enough to prove which outcome the judge wanted to happen.
You are a moron.
by Q. » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:52 pm
kickinit wrote:I don't know about you boney, but when you have someone that gives a pretty good description of how much your worth, where you live and future plans you have, i'd say they know you pretty well. Then to sit under oath and tell the jury that you didn't know who he was, is a outright lie. The evidence to prove this to the jury should of been shown, yet the judge didn't allow it to be shown.
by kickinit » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:54 pm
Q. wrote:kickinit wrote:I don't know about you boney, but when you have someone that gives a pretty good description of how much your worth, where you live and future plans you have, i'd say they know you pretty well. Then to sit under oath and tell the jury that you didn't know who he was, is a outright lie. The evidence to prove this to the jury should of been shown, yet the judge didn't allow it to be shown.
******* pmsl
by kickinit » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:12 pm
woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:As for boycotting OTR, I don't see the point, but good luck to you. I'm pretty sure he won't miss your business.
i'm sure he won't... But the bloke is a disgrace and i refuse to put my hard earned into his company...
by RB » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:55 pm
by Brodlach » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:58 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Q. » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:59 pm
Brodlach wrote:Walking down the Parade today I was behind a woman with an absolute cracking body to die for. Everything was spectacular. She then stopped and turned around and she was hideous to look at. It got me thinking would a chick rather be beautiful with an ordinary body or a cracking body and ordinary looking?
Thoughts!
by bennymacca » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:18 pm
Brodlach wrote:Walking down the Parade today I was behind a woman with an absolute cracking body to die for. Everything was spectacular. She then stopped and turned around and she was hideous to look at. It got me thinking would a chick rather be beautiful with an ordinary body or a cracking body and ordinary looking?
Thoughts!
by Gozu » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:51 pm
Brodlach wrote:Walking down the Parade today I was behind a woman with an absolute cracking body to die for. Everything was spectacular. She then stopped and turned around and she was hideous to look at. It got me thinking would a chick rather be beautiful with an ordinary body or a cracking body and ordinary looking?
Thoughts!
by Bully » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:55 pm
Gozu wrote:Brodlach wrote:Walking down the Parade today I was behind a woman with an absolute cracking body to die for. Everything was spectacular. She then stopped and turned around and she was hideous to look at. It got me thinking would a chick rather be beautiful with an ordinary body or a cracking body and ordinary looking?
Thoughts!
I remember I lived in a block of flats with a chick like that, she had a smoking hot body and always wore sunglasses. I used to wonder how the younger fellas there controlled themselves around her. Eventually one day I saw her without the sunnies on and I was 'yikes!'
by Gozu » Wed Jan 28, 2015 11:06 pm
Bully wrote:Gozu wrote:Brodlach wrote:Walking down the Parade today I was behind a woman with an absolute cracking body to die for. Everything was spectacular. She then stopped and turned around and she was hideous to look at. It got me thinking would a chick rather be beautiful with an ordinary body or a cracking body and ordinary looking?
Thoughts!
I remember I lived in a block of flats with a chick like that, she had a smoking hot body and always wore sunglasses. I used to wonder how the younger fellas there controlled themselves around her. Eventually one day I saw her without the sunnies on and I was 'yikes!'
or the make up caked on her ?
by dedja » Thu Jan 29, 2015 2:47 am
kickinit wrote:dedja wrote:kickinit wrote: The evidence of the court holding out information from the jury is enough to prove which outcome the judge wanted to happen.
You are a moron.
Is that it? I thought someone as smart as you would be able to come up with something better then that. How's that article in the advertiser today, so much for being a hero cop, or is he a hero cop for harassing and assaulting members of the public.
by woodublieve12 » Thu Jan 29, 2015 7:26 am
kickinit wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Booney wrote:As for boycotting OTR, I don't see the point, but good luck to you. I'm pretty sure he won't miss your business.
i'm sure he won't... But the bloke is a disgrace and i refuse to put my hard earned into his company...
wow never heard anyone being called a disgrace for standing up for their rights. I'm sure if you look up disgrace you will find a copy of franklins contract.
by Booney » Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:16 am
Q. wrote:kickinit wrote:I don't know about you boney, but when you have someone that gives a pretty good description of how much your worth, where you live and future plans you have, i'd say they know you pretty well. Then to sit under oath and tell the jury that you didn't know who he was, is a outright lie. The evidence to prove this to the jury should of been shown, yet the judge didn't allow it to be shown.
******* pmsl
by Q. » Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:19 am
Booney wrote:Q. wrote:kickinit wrote:I don't know about you boney, but when you have someone that gives a pretty good description of how much your worth, where you live and future plans you have, i'd say they know you pretty well. Then to sit under oath and tell the jury that you didn't know who he was, is a outright lie. The evidence to prove this to the jury should of been shown, yet the judge didn't allow it to be shown.
******* pmsl
Not the first time, wont be the last....
by Booney » Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:39 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |