by scottroo » Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:46 am
by Amateur Footy » Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:02 pm
Rubber Chest wrote:running defender wrote:Ivens would be 3 Delvins would be 2 because he played mainly reserves. But D.Ebert gone to kersbrook, Ebel retired , vidik retired, kluvy gone to sturt.
Any player that has played league for majority of year and goes to a country club is 4pts, unless they played junior's at your club then they are zero pts.
The AAPS is a very interesting topic, that needs a independent review and a lot of discussion. You can play in a grand final with 11pts miss the 5 next year with 9pts say you only win 5 games and next year you get 13 doesn't add up. Also teams coming from country shouldn't have their previous seasons included In your averages. Whats the thinking?
Correct. Ebel retired? Pretty keen to continue I think. I'm sure they'll have a recruit come out of the woodwork to enhance there chances of another GF appearance.
Boras - a huge in for TV. Expect to see him at the top of the goal kicking table alongside Grocke. From what I saw last year there is no one in the comp big/ good enough to stop Grocke if he is fair dinkum. May have a similar affect on the competition as S Grimm did from Hahndorf. (Watched him win a GF at Onkas from the goal square).
by RooShootOhh » Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:27 pm
scottroo wrote:Correct I saw him at flight centre booking it while I was booking my honeymoon!!
by spot on » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:43 pm
by running defender » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:20 pm
by Amateur Footy » Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:12 am
by The Panther » Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:33 am
RooShootOhh wrote:scottroo wrote:Correct I saw him at flight centre booking it while I was booking my honeymoon!!
Don't do it mate
by overthehill » Fri Jan 16, 2015 10:39 am
Amateur Footy wrote:TV already had the best ruckman in the comp, why would they bother.
by Amateur Footy » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:02 pm
overthehill wrote:Amateur Footy wrote:TV already had the best ruckman in the comp, why would they bother.
I agree AF but as Hanna only stands at 5Ft 6. id be very surprised if they were paying him to ruck
by running defender » Sat Jan 17, 2015 11:13 am
by Spiderman » Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:09 pm
by running defender » Sun Jan 18, 2015 8:49 pm
by saintal » Mon Jan 19, 2015 9:28 pm
by running defender » Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:30 am
by Legs Man » Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:52 am
by always there » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:02 am
by BoundaryRider84 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 7:03 am
by Legs Man » Tue Jan 20, 2015 8:10 am
always there wrote:Which clubs are you referring to when you say "bigger" clubs and uneven underage population base.?
by cracka » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:15 am
running defender wrote:Yes very unlucky. Apparently not one club questioned the board over the blowout of the court costs 90k is the word, after been told 15 to 20k. Then the by/law Changed not to include finals. The relegation pts table discussed not to include j/colts but once again voted down by the bigger clubs . No you couldn't have the bigger clubs share kids no leave them on the sideline after paying 150 subs 100 for boots, 50 for shorts and socks, let alone the petrol for running the kids around.
by Red Rocket » Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:07 am
BoundaryRider84 wrote:Geez I'm so glad the BLG directors have their heads screwed on. It's nice down here in the Barossa ;-)
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |