
by LPH » Wed Sep 17, 2014 12:12 pm
by mal » Wed Sep 17, 2014 1:14 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 17, 2014 3:25 pm
by Aerie » Wed Sep 17, 2014 3:46 pm
bennymacca wrote:That would have happened in previous years would it not?
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 17, 2014 3:48 pm
Aerie wrote:bennymacca wrote:That would have happened in previous years would it not?
Given the SANFL Grand Final was the weekend after the AFL GF it was well and truly known by selection who was and wasn't available. Same issues may have occurred in earlier finals.
by RB » Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:33 pm
by SANFLnut » Wed Sep 17, 2014 6:15 pm
mal wrote:The farce continues
Impey and A Young may or may not be available to play in the Norwood v Port Reserves Grand Final this week
As I understand it
If Impey and A Young are not selected in the AFL prelim Final
Then :
If Port Power beat Hawthorn both can play in a SANFL Grand Final
If Port Power loses to Hawthorn both can not play in the SANFL Grand Final
I know there are rules in place but
How the f..k can they prepare themselves this week
Both may not play any football this weekend
And if they both don't play at all this weekend it is a disgrace
As far as Im concerned the players MUST come first in these issues
Power and Reserves are both playing on the same weekend within a day of each other
Common sense decrees that whoever misses out on the AFL list should be allowed to play for the SANFL list
That means that the SANFL team can not be stacked
If it was a weekend apart , I can understand to a degree
Given the circumstances both should be allowed to play no matter what
Its what these guys are geared up for Finals and Grand Finals success
Forget about no AFL in the SANFL
These Port players must be taken care of
The farce continues
by spell_check » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:31 pm
by saintal » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:35 pm
spell_check wrote:So, with the chief reason why this thread exists (along with everything else we have seen over the past year) sacked from his position, can we call the Crows Reserves experiment a success?
by LPH » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:36 pm
by Apachebulldog » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:44 pm
by whufc » Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:46 pm
by sjt » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:02 pm
by matt35 » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:26 pm
by heater31 » Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:46 pm
matt35 wrote:To think Sanderson's sacking will have any impact on the Crows participation in the SANFL is laughable. Of course he was an advocate for it; but do you really think whoever is the next Crows coach is going to say, let's unwind that and go back to having our players scattered throughout the SANFL competition? Of course not! Will make no difference at all.
by whufc » Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:16 am
by bennymacca » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:31 am
whufc wrote:Has the SANFL hit all new lows.
We now have clubs losing players to rival clubs in the same competition thanks to a 'reality' tv show.
I cant think of how this comp could be compromised any more.
by sjt » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:37 am
bennymacca wrote:whufc wrote:Has the SANFL hit all new lows.
We now have clubs losing players to rival clubs in the same competition thanks to a 'reality' tv show.
I cant think of how this comp could be compromised any more.
LOL he played half a season!!! Now you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel
by whufc » Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:54 am
bennymacca wrote:whufc wrote:Has the SANFL hit all new lows.
We now have clubs losing players to rival clubs in the same competition thanks to a 'reality' tv show.
I cant think of how this comp could be compromised any more.
LOL he played half a season!!! Now you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel
by bennymacca » Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:22 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |