by fiftympenalty » Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:26 pm
by shoe boy » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:50 am
oxa wrote:The young fella from porties is still in hospital and will require a couple of ops on eye socket and face. May also have a blood clot behind his eye. All the best to him and his wife in what I would say will be hard few weeks
by vics01 » Tue Sep 09, 2014 2:15 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:05 pm
by Down the Hill » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:53 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:59 pm
Down the Hill wrote:Give the full story Dutchy. Both sides had 5 minutes each way and because the scores were still tied at the end of the 2nd five minute period the game continued with the siren sounding when the next score occurred which was Morphett Vale. Yes they had the breeze in the second 5 minute period which was to their advantage but that also means that FH had first use of the breeze at the start of the game and in the first period of extra time which was probably to their advantage. Morphett Vale was also the only team to kick a goal into the breeze during the whole match so maybe they deserved to win anyway. So unless you want a ridiculous penalty shoot out like soccer then I can't see how anyone can complain about the eventual winner and the extra time system.
by King » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:20 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Give the full story Dutchy. Both sides had 5 minutes each way and because the scores were still tied at the end of the 2nd five minute period the game continued with the siren sounding when the next score occurred which was Morphett Vale. Yes they had the breeze in the second 5 minute period which was to their advantage but that also means that FH had first use of the breeze at the start of the game and in the first period of extra time which was probably to their advantage. Morphett Vale was also the only team to kick a goal into the breeze during the whole match so maybe they deserved to win anyway. So unless you want a ridiculous penalty shoot out like soccer then I can't see how anyone can complain about the eventual winner and the extra time system.
Surely it would be better to run another set of 5 each way considering the stakes. Silly rule which is more about expediency than credibility of the result.
by Down the Hill » Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:37 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Down the Hill wrote:Give the full story Dutchy. Both sides had 5 minutes each way and because the scores were still tied at the end of the 2nd five minute period the game continued with the siren sounding when the next score occurred which was Morphett Vale. Yes they had the breeze in the second 5 minute period which was to their advantage but that also means that FH had first use of the breeze at the start of the game and in the first period of extra time which was probably to their advantage. Morphett Vale was also the only team to kick a goal into the breeze during the whole match so maybe they deserved to win anyway. So unless you want a ridiculous penalty shoot out like soccer then I can't see how anyone can complain about the eventual winner and the extra time system.
Surely it would be better to run another set of 5 each way considering the stakes. Silly rule which is more about expediency than credibility of the result.
by Dutchy » Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:39 pm
by Esteban Vihaio » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:02 pm
fiftympenalty wrote:The damage that this has done to the victim is inexcusable. At the end of the day footy is still a game but theres still so many players out there willing to inflict permanent damage to any of their opponents, and for what?
Have heard many reports of the incident from both sides and it is an absolute disgrace. If a free kick arises due to an infringement on the rules then so be it. But to be a hero like the coward was that punched the cockledivers player is so bloody weak and doesn't just deserve a trip to the tribunal but if the damage to the victim is as bad as I am hearing he should be facing some form of criminal offence charge, otherwise actions like this wont ever be stamped out of the game. Players seem to think that because they are doing something on the footy field its not a criminal offence, when really if someone has been damaged as severely as the victim was as a result of a cheap and cowardly act then it doesn't matter where the incident occurs, it is still assault
Im sure Im not the only one that feels this strongly about it because its rubbish like this that ruins the game. OK, yes its finals and yes it is a competition taken fairly seriously, but at the end of the day youre playing borderline country football and if I was the person who'd dished out the ridiculous hit, I would be ashamed of myself. Although I have said that the incident is a matter for the justice system, I still believe the league should ban this hero for life and take a stance because we don't need players like that in the game. Definition of a loser
by spot on » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:18 pm
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:27 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:35 pm
by Numbers » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:39 pm
by Esteban Vihaio » Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:46 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:What do you want us to say EV?
Nobody likes to see or hear about a player seriously injured playing sport.
I was on far side of oval so didn't see it happen, just the player being assisted off.
Nobody from Flaggies defended our player on the day, or in here
It happened down the far end away from the majority of spectators. As posters can't give any further info, we aren't really in a position to say anything worthwhile.
Once the outcome of the tribunal is known, and our delegate provides information to them, the club will respond to our members.
by Down the Hill » Wed Sep 10, 2014 12:14 am
Numbers wrote:The piss weak coward only got 5 games!
Not enough considering the victim will never play again! Has to retire from contact sport at 26 & will likely be vision impaired for life effecting he's ability to earn an income.
Poor form also from the culprit referring to himself as Rocky!
by shoe boy » Wed Sep 10, 2014 8:04 am
by Keyser Soze » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:15 am
Esteban Vihaio wrote:85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:What do you want us to say EV?
Nobody likes to see or hear about a player seriously injured playing sport.
I was on far side of oval so didn't see it happen, just the player being assisted off.
Nobody from Flaggies defended our player on the day, or in here
It happened down the far end away from the majority of spectators. As posters can't give any further info, we aren't really in a position to say anything worthwhile.
Once the outcome of the tribunal is known, and our delegate provides information to them, the club will respond to our members.[/
outcome is now known. Looking forward to you response
by Oldman Munga » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:19 am
by vics01 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:30 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |