by The Panther » Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:40 pm
by rock » Tue Aug 19, 2014 1:41 pm
The Panther wrote:overthehill wrote:Afterthesiren wrote:Can someone from Onkas please tell me why a convicted criminal is again playing for them after recent release on parole. Has anyone cared to read the court report in relation to this serious offence? Why would a club allow a person of this character to return?
Very poor post from a faceless person that has very little intelligence. Shame, shame, shame
Agreed. The general public usually have zero understanding of matters such as these. It's easy to hide behind a keyboard and create hysteria.
Having met the young man outside of football , I would have no concerns with him being at my club.
by magpiemaster » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:12 pm
by Yellow & Black » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:59 pm
by Rubber Chest » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:22 pm
Yellow & Black wrote:MM refreshing to hear footy talk. Let's shelve the whole relegation debate until after the season. Hahndorf has to be proud of their junior program and I'm sure is the envy of all other HFL Clubs, if what I hear is correct, the sponsorship $$'s your juniors raise is amazing.
Yesterday I raised a question regarding TV and Onkas qualifying A Graders for B Grade finals, what's the ruling because one of those 2 teams could easily upset a Uraidla or Blackwood in the big dance?
by The Panther » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:23 pm
by Banker » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:40 pm
The Panther wrote:If Mount Barker defeat Lobethal . What kind of win would Echunga require over Hahndorf to jump into 3rd.
by Armytank » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:40 pm
Yellow & Black wrote:Yesterday I raised a question regarding TV and Onkas qualifying A Graders for B Grade finals, what's the ruling because one of those 2 teams could easily upset a Uraidla or Blackwood in the big dance?
by Armytank » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:43 pm
Rubber Chest wrote:Yellow & Black wrote:MM refreshing to hear footy talk. Let's shelve the whole relegation debate until after the season. Hahndorf has to be proud of their junior program and I'm sure is the envy of all other HFL Clubs, if what I hear is correct, the sponsorship $$'s your juniors raise is amazing.
Yesterday I raised a question regarding TV and Onkas qualifying A Graders for B Grade finals, what's the ruling because one of those 2 teams could easily upset a Uraidla or Blackwood in the big dance?
The general rule is that you need to play more B grade then A grade and play the last game of the year in B grade to play B grade finals unless your A grade is in the finals and then the rule changes again. However, this is not always the case. Watch ONKAS get a permit to play Kerber, Ferraro and B smart (again) in their B grade finals team when they've clearly played more A grade than B grade. I think it depends on how the HFL feel on the day and generally they are fairly generous. Who wants to see players missing out. We can't complain at Lobey as our permits have generally been approved.
by The Panther » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:07 pm
Banker wrote:The Panther wrote:If Mount Barker defeat Lobethal . What kind of win would Echunga require over Hahndorf to jump into 3rd.
Very very unlikely. Echunga would need Mt Barker to win by 10+ goals and also belt Handorf by 20+ goals.
by cracka » Tue Aug 19, 2014 8:20 pm
Rubber Chest wrote:Yellow & Black wrote:MM refreshing to hear footy talk. Let's shelve the whole relegation debate until after the season. Hahndorf has to be proud of their junior program and I'm sure is the envy of all other HFL Clubs, if what I hear is correct, the sponsorship $$'s your juniors raise is amazing.
Yesterday I raised a question regarding TV and Onkas qualifying A Graders for B Grade finals, what's the ruling because one of those 2 teams could easily upset a Uraidla or Blackwood in the big dance?
The general rule is that you need to play more B grade then A grade and play the last game of the year in B grade to play B grade finals unless your A grade is in the finals and then the rule changes again. However, this is not always the case. Watch ONKAS get a permit to play Kerber, Ferraro and B smart (again) in their B grade finals team when they've clearly played more A grade than B grade. I think it depends on how the HFL feel on the day and generally they are fairly generous. Who wants to see players missing out. We can't complain at Lobey as our permits have generally been approved.
by The Gimp » Wed Aug 20, 2014 12:19 am
by On The Chest » Wed Aug 20, 2014 6:12 am
by Legs Man » Wed Aug 20, 2014 9:38 am
On The Chest wrote:Having read this forum for a fair while, I am a bit over all the carry on about relegations, clubs being strong in A grade but their B grade and others being ordinary etc. This went on last year with Lofty and now with Echunga. Whether I agree with it or not doesn't matter. That's the rules I guess.
The part I haven't seen mentioned on here and am seeking clarification on is.
Let's for arguments sake say Echunga get relegated to country due mainly to poor performances in lower grades.
Does the club in country league that is looking for promotion have to be the club of the year in country league or just the winner of the A grade flag?
by On The Chest » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:12 am
by Legs Man » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:56 am
On The Chest wrote:Thanks for that Legs Man.
Seems strange that they only rely on A grade results to go from country to Central as long as you can field the other teams but to avoid relegation from Central, they use results from all grades.
To me that shows you need to have good numbers in the seniors plus good results along with a good colts program, and numbers, before you would contemplate going from country to Central even if eligible.
All the best for the finals
by Banker » Wed Aug 20, 2014 10:59 am
The Panther wrote:Banker wrote:The Panther wrote:If Mount Barker defeat Lobethal . What kind of win would Echunga require over Hahndorf to jump into 3rd.
Very very unlikely. Echunga would need Mt Barker to win by 10+ goals and also belt Handorf by 20+ goals.
Having a look at for and against, I don't think its that dramatic. It might depend on what sort of team Hahndorf puts out.
by Tanka » Thu Aug 21, 2014 10:25 am
by Banker » Sat Aug 23, 2014 7:07 pm
Banker wrote:
Very very unlikely. Echunga would need Mt Barker to win by 10+ goals and also belt Handorf by 20+ goals.
by cracka » Sat Aug 23, 2014 8:24 pm
Banker wrote:Banker wrote:
Very very unlikely. Echunga would need Mt Barker to win by 10+ goals and also belt Handorf by 20+ goals.
![]()
Maybe not?? I just got a text that Echunga and Barker have had big wins and Echunga have taken 3rd spot! Can anyone confirm??
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |