by Bob Loblaw » Fri Jul 18, 2014 1:05 pm
by footys the winner » Fri Jul 18, 2014 3:37 pm
by magpieeagle » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:42 pm
by Hazbeen » Sun Jul 20, 2014 1:48 pm
magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
by Swamp Donkey » Mon Jul 21, 2014 10:16 am
Swamp Donkey wrote:wangas#4 wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:Kcco wrote:Not sure if that was a deliberate act by the big fella or not. I didn't exactly see the event unfold but I've heard different stories by people from two wells saying it was and it wasn't.
What was the outcome? Injury/report??
Pontt knocked out concusion.
Report nil.
Couldn't have been that bad if Two Wells didn't lodge a report.
On a different note, and I hate talking about this because I realise our league is really struggling to get umpires, but.............I think we witnessed a poor umpiring performance on Saturday in the match between Mallala and Hamley, one umpire in particular was poor.
by Lame Choice » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:34 am
Swamp Donkey wrote:After bagging them last week, I thought I should compliment them this week after a fine job. The two umpires involved in Saturday's match between Mallala and Virginia I thought did a great job and were arguably the best we have had this season. I'm pretty sure anyone from Virginia would agree (maybe not Bascombe - possibly on report??).
by Lame Choice » Mon Jul 21, 2014 11:38 am
Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:11 pm
Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
by magpieeagle » Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:58 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
The whole boundary umpiring thing is a joke most weeks. You see people doing it bare-footed carrying a can of coke or kicking the ball with their mates near the boundary miles away from the play.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:04 pm
magpieeagle wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
The whole boundary umpiring thing is a joke most weeks. You see people doing it bare-footed carrying a can of coke or kicking the ball with their mates near the boundary miles away from the play.
The league were paying clubs for boundary A grade umpires hence why we had the same two doing it all the time, was good pocket money for the colts, then in their wisdom decided to stop the payments 6 rounds in this year, don't tell me they are broke, everyone that helps the association board do it off their own backs with no reimbursement, maybe some clubs just kept the cash for themselves
by wangas#4 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:11 pm
Lame Choice wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:After bagging them last week, I thought I should compliment them this week after a fine job. The two umpires involved in Saturday's match between Mallala and Virginia I thought did a great job and were arguably the best we have had this season. I'm pretty sure anyone from Virginia would agree (maybe not Bascombe - possibly on report??).
Pity the Virg supporters (?) on the outer didn't think so. Will coppped it all day by name. Makes me wonder if people like that think they are improving the situation with all the free advice
Mallala have hit top gear now with a few still to come back I hear.
Balaklava the dark horse.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 21, 2014 2:13 pm
wangas#4 wrote:Lame Choice wrote:Swamp Donkey wrote:After bagging them last week, I thought I should compliment them this week after a fine job. The two umpires involved in Saturday's match between Mallala and Virginia I thought did a great job and were arguably the best we have had this season. I'm pretty sure anyone from Virginia would agree (maybe not Bascombe - possibly on report??).
Pity the Virg supporters (?) on the outer didn't think so. Will coppped it all day by name. Makes me wonder if people like that think they are improving the situation with all the free advice
Mallala have hit top gear now with a few still to come back I hear.
Balaklava the dark horse.
Who where the umps this week SD.
by BoundaryRider84 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:18 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
The whole boundary umpiring thing is a joke most weeks. You see people doing it bare-footed carrying a can of coke or kicking the ball with their mates near the boundary miles away from the play.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:41 pm
BoundaryRider84 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
The whole boundary umpiring thing is a joke most weeks. You see people doing it bare-footed carrying a can of coke or kicking the ball with their mates near the boundary miles away from the play.
Field umpires and 2 x Boundary umpires supplied in both a grade and reserves . God praise the Barossa, light and Gawler umpiring panel
by Lame Choice » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:56 pm
magpieeagle wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Hazbeen wrote:magpieeagle wrote:Mallala strong winners over Virginia in all grades, just one matter>why did the rams have a 12yr old kid boundary umpire on his own both A/Reserve grades, they must have older people somewhere able of doing it.
Isn't there a league rule that for A grade the boundary umps are supposed to be over a certain age to stop young kids doing it?
The whole boundary umpiring thing is a joke most weeks. You see people doing it bare-footed carrying a can of coke or kicking the ball with their mates near the boundary miles away from the play.
The league were paying clubs for boundary A grade umpires hence why we had the same two doing it all the time, was good pocket money for the colts, then in their wisdom decided to stop the payments 6 rounds in this year, don't tell me they are broke, everyone that helps the association board do it off their own backs with no reimbursement, maybe some clubs just kept the cash for themselves
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:03 pm
Lame Choice wrote:
The league introduced the 'green shirt' boundary umpires a few years back to give young lads a pathway to field umpiring. It was jointly funded between the league and the participating clubs. By mid this year it was apparent that only one club was left involved and that the purpose was not being realised, so the program ceased.
Most clubs now roster preceding game players to do boundary on a volunteer basis. Problem arises if you start paying for boundary umpires, either the league provides them at cost (hard enough to provide field umpires), or the clubs pay for them (which comes from their coffers - either gate or bar profit etc.). There is a strong argument that if you start paying boundary umpires, what about the other volunteers - water boys, goal umpires, time keepers, interchange stewards.....
by heater31 » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:08 pm
by Lame Choice » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:10 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Lame Choice wrote:
The league introduced the 'green shirt' boundary umpires a few years back to give young lads a pathway to field umpiring. It was jointly funded between the league and the participating clubs. By mid this year it was apparent that only one club was left involved and that the purpose was not being realised, so the program ceased.
Most clubs now roster preceding game players to do boundary on a volunteer basis. Problem arises if you start paying for boundary umpires, either the league provides them at cost (hard enough to provide field umpires), or the clubs pay for them (which comes from their coffers - either gate or bar profit etc.). There is a strong argument that if you start paying boundary umpires, what about the other volunteers - water boys, goal umpires, time keepers, interchange stewards.....
Boundary umpiring is a bloody tough gig. The club I used to be involved in through the SAAFL used to pay the boundary and goal umpires, the time keeper used to get a drink card, water boys and score board attendants used to get a kitchen voucher to get a pie, packet of chips and a drink or something similar.
the other volunteers used to get looked after at the end of season presentations with token gifts.
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:38 am
Lame Choice wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Lame Choice wrote:
The league introduced the 'green shirt' boundary umpires a few years back to give young lads a pathway to field umpiring. It was jointly funded between the league and the participating clubs. By mid this year it was apparent that only one club was left involved and that the purpose was not being realised, so the program ceased.
Most clubs now roster preceding game players to do boundary on a volunteer basis. Problem arises if you start paying for boundary umpires, either the league provides them at cost (hard enough to provide field umpires), or the clubs pay for them (which comes from their coffers - either gate or bar profit etc.). There is a strong argument that if you start paying boundary umpires, what about the other volunteers - water boys, goal umpires, time keepers, interchange stewards.....
Boundary umpiring is a bloody tough gig. The club I used to be involved in through the SAAFL used to pay the boundary and goal umpires, the time keeper used to get a drink card, water boys and score board attendants used to get a kitchen voucher to get a pie, packet of chips and a drink or something similar.
the other volunteers used to get looked after at the end of season presentations with token gifts.
Which is great if the clubs are prepared to do this. Considering some player payment arrangements, it makes you wonder where the priorities lie.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |