
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:58 am
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:59 am
by LPH » Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:02 am
Booney wrote:And you go on about "integrity"......go figure.
by Dutchy » Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:16 am
Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
by zipzap » Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:32 am
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:36 am
Dutchy wrote:Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
Im guessing that was the motivation rather than a political protest as such.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:54 am
by wild dog » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:03 am
Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
by Rising Power » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:07 am
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:17 am
wild dog wrote:Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.
by LPH » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:51 am
by wild dog » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:52 am
Booney wrote:wild dog wrote:Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.
We had money to spend?!?!?![]()
Of course, you'll have the answers at hand?
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:08 pm
wild dog wrote:Booney wrote:wild dog wrote:Booney wrote:Anyway, I guess anything Sturt can do to get people through the gate to watch the game is good for them. They need the money as much as anyone and a bit of controversy wont hurt.
Yeah I mean what options do they have. Hang on they could keep on spending money like a p*ssed sailor and then ask for handout after handout. Seems to work for some.
We had money to spend?!?!?![]()
Of course, you'll have the answers at hand?
That's the point Booney.
You will get it eventually me old mucker, and I wont have to provide the answers.
by LPH » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:22 pm
by Booney » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:33 pm
by LPH » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:48 pm
by Rik E Boy » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:55 pm
kickinit wrote:Just wondering does this rule still apply on SAFooty? Dutchy some of your recent posts make one think it's ok to troll now?
by stan » Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:01 pm
LPH wrote:Booney wrote:And you go on about "integrity"......go figure.
And YOUR Club is so full of Integrity, aren't they?
Again, does the name Bruce Webber mean anything to you?
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:34 pm
by topsywaldron » Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:39 pm
CUTTERMAN wrote:Chris Davies was allegedly quite upset. Maybe he should be more concerned about the inequity of television coverage and total loss of integrity in the competition. Lapdog.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |