Jimmy_041 wrote:Gutless act he didn't need to do
Spot on...
by Big Phil » Tue May 13, 2014 10:09 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Gutless act he didn't need to do
by Ronnie » Wed May 14, 2014 9:43 am
by Jimmy_041 » Wed May 14, 2014 9:50 am
Big Phil wrote:My gut feel, having seen it live on the day and then again on replay, was that it was probably a 3-4 week suspension, then with a good record down to 2-3 weeks. But, the Tribunal must have seen it worst than that and offered the 5 weeks. Looks like the Magpies will appeal it...
by MightyEagles » Wed May 14, 2014 11:22 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:Big Phil wrote:My gut feel, having seen it live on the day and then again on replay, was that it was probably a 3-4 week suspension, then with a good record down to 2-3 weeks. But, the Tribunal must have seen it worst than that and offered the 5 weeks. Looks like the Magpies will appeal it...
I hope the Tribunal realises their mistake and ups it to 8
by Booney » Wed May 14, 2014 11:24 am
MightyEagles wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Big Phil wrote:My gut feel, having seen it live on the day and then again on replay, was that it was probably a 3-4 week suspension, then with a good record down to 2-3 weeks. But, the Tribunal must have seen it worst than that and offered the 5 weeks. Looks like the Magpies will appeal it...
I hope the Tribunal realises their mistake and ups it to 8
Agree, if Groke got 7 games then this should be about the same.
by CUTTERMAN » Wed May 14, 2014 11:32 am
by SANFLnut » Wed May 14, 2014 1:13 pm
Booney wrote:MightyEagles wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:Big Phil wrote:My gut feel, having seen it live on the day and then again on replay, was that it was probably a 3-4 week suspension, then with a good record down to 2-3 weeks. But, the Tribunal must have seen it worst than that and offered the 5 weeks. Looks like the Magpies will appeal it...
I hope the Tribunal realises their mistake and ups it to 8
Agree, if Groke got 7 games then this should be about the same.
Simply, no. Grocke deserved far more.
Slattery also suffered concussion suggesting it was a head clash, not elbow and head.
by Big Phil » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:50 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:55 pm
by SimonH » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:09 pm
by Doddy » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:10 pm
by bloods08 » Mon Jun 16, 2014 11:13 pm
Doddy wrote:What was the result on the Slattery report a few weeks ago (mentioned above)? The discussion stops prior to the outcome and the SANFL reports page seems terribly out of date.
by JK » Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:01 pm
by Big Phil » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:31 pm
by JK » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:41 pm
Big Phil wrote:Flynn actually got 5 weeks (over 500 points) but then with the clean record and early guilty plea, it was reduced to a 2 week ban...
by saintal » Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:46 pm
Big Phil wrote:Flynn actually got 5 weeks (over 500 points) but then with the clean record and early guilty plea, it was reduced to a 2 week ban...
by stampy » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:07 pm
by blueandwhite » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:38 pm
by heater31 » Tue Jun 17, 2014 6:43 pm
stampy wrote:good to see rolfe having to explain his coward hit on joseph
by Wedgie » Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:26 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |