Monopoly Man wrote:Isn't current Mannum coach Chris Hall from Hackham? Someone should call him and get him and his pack of stars out of my comp!!! Make it easier for us!
Is this Chris Hall the former South Adelaide player?
by Moe » Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:17 am
Monopoly Man wrote:Isn't current Mannum coach Chris Hall from Hackham? Someone should call him and get him and his pack of stars out of my comp!!! Make it easier for us!
by Mister Footy » Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:19 am
DevilsBreaths06 wrote:The Hackham issue is more about one spoilt little brat thinking he is better than everybody else.. Abuses support staff, abuses umpires costing the team.. Undermines the coach with a view to having his old man take over as coach.. The sooner he goes the better the club will be.. Sure a couple will go but they would not be there next year anyway A lot more will stay because they respect the CLUB and the coach.
Hawks will lose a lot more if the coach goes, more likely the club will fold..
No wonder the Flies did not stop the transfer
He ask the senior group last week who was coming to Aldinga with him....No one moved.
by Monopoly Man » Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:30 am
Moe wrote:Monopoly Man wrote:Isn't current Mannum coach Chris Hall from Hackham? Someone should call him and get him and his pack of stars out of my comp!!! Make it easier for us!
Is this Chris Hall the former South Adelaide player?
by Moe » Sat Jun 07, 2014 10:06 am
Monopoly Man wrote:Moe wrote:Monopoly Man wrote:Isn't current Mannum coach Chris Hall from Hackham? Someone should call him and get him and his pack of stars out of my comp!!! Make it easier for us!
Is this Chris Hall the former South Adelaide player?
Indeed it is Moe. Still playing occasionally and tearing it up when he does.
by chopper7 » Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:03 am
by Look Good In Leather » Tue Jun 10, 2014 11:29 am
chopper7 wrote:Is the whole interleague concept still well supported in your league? I am involved with the Hills and we had our first IL game in nearly five years on the weekend beating River Murray by 5 points. There was a huge crowd down at the bridge and some serious footy was played, and speaking from Hills people I think the concept was welcomed back with opened arms. This being the case, just want to get a few opinions on here with the old Lovelock Shield all our Leagues were once involved in. How do you think your league would take to the idea of re forming it? I think you'd get a few more guys keen if you actually had something to play for after a solid weekend of good football played. Just thought I'd open it up and see what you guys are thinking
by afc9798 » Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:02 am
by mrp2626 » Wed Jun 11, 2014 10:12 am
by Oldman Munga » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:08 pm
by afc9798 » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:35 am
Oldman Munga wrote:I hear everyone has kissed and made up @ Hackham , Even the Bolly's
by Esteban Vihaio » Sat Jun 14, 2014 7:04 pm
by Mister Footy » Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:15 pm
by shoe boy » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:10 am
by Front & Centre » Mon Jun 16, 2014 9:32 am
by shoe boy » Mon Jun 16, 2014 10:02 am
Front & Centre wrote:So what's everyones thoughts on what will happen at the big SFL meeting tonight? Are any of the recommendations going to get up? Personally I think they have missed the mark on many issues and certainly the change of junior grade ages seems unnecessary - if it aint broke why fix it?
by Look Good In Leather » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:55 pm
Front & Centre wrote:So what's everyones thoughts on what will happen at the big SFL meeting tonight? Are any of the recommendations going to get up? Personally I think they have missed the mark on many issues and certainly the change of junior grade ages seems unnecessary - if it aint broke why fix it?
by Front & Centre » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:25 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Front & Centre wrote:So what's everyones thoughts on what will happen at the big SFL meeting tonight? Are any of the recommendations going to get up? Personally I think they have missed the mark on many issues and certainly the change of junior grade ages seems unnecessary - if it aint broke why fix it?
Almost half of clubs do not field a full set of teams in their own right (7/15)
33% of clubs do not field a team in the U/16 comp
33% of clubs do not field a team in the U/14 comp
100% of games played in the U/18 comp this week resulted in the winning team doubling their opponents score or more with the other game a forfeit
Only one game each this week in the U/14 and U/16 comps were decided by a margin less than 6 goals
It is very broken, something needs to be done. The debate is if the proposal goes far enough.
by shoe boy » Mon Jun 16, 2014 2:56 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:Front & Centre wrote:So what's everyones thoughts on what will happen at the big SFL meeting tonight? Are any of the recommendations going to get up? Personally I think they have missed the mark on many issues and certainly the change of junior grade ages seems unnecessary - if it aint broke why fix it?
Almost half of clubs do not field a full set of teams in their own right (7/15)
33% of clubs do not field a team in the U/16 comp
33% of clubs do not field a team in the U/14 comp
100% of games played in the U/18 comp this week resulted in the winning team doubling their opponents score or more with the other game a forfeit
Only one game each this week in the U/14 and U/16 comps were decided by a margin less than 6 goals
It is very broken, something needs to be done. The debate is if the proposal goes far enough.
by sweendog » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:17 pm
by shoe boy » Mon Jun 16, 2014 3:27 pm
sweendog wrote:WELL LOOKS LIKE SHOES NEED TO FIND ANOTHER COMP SHOEBOY AS YOU DO NOT HAVE YOUR OWN U18 TEAM OUTRIGHT....SEEYA LATER OFF TO THE GSFL YOU GO
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |