by smac » Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:11 am
by Wedgie » Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:32 am
LEH wrote:Can't work out how to change my Username - besides, then I would lose my 'Post numbers'
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by UK Fan » Tue Apr 15, 2014 10:43 am
smac wrote:My spare time is quite hard earned. But no, I've never paid enough money to sponsor the club with the hope of brandishing that sponsorship for my own outcomes whilst earning the condemnation of the board and administration of the club.
You are a pissant supporter the club could do without.
And so can I. Foe list for you, your replies will not be read.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Booney » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:06 am
smac wrote:My spare time is quite hard earned. But no, I've never paid enough money to sponsor the club with the hope of brandishing that sponsorship for my own outcomes whilst earning the condemnation of the board and administration of the club.
You are a pissant supporter the club could do without.
And so can I. Foe list for you, your replies will not be read.
by UK Fan » Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:14 am
Booney wrote:smac wrote:My spare time is quite hard earned. But no, I've never paid enough money to sponsor the club with the hope of brandishing that sponsorship for my own outcomes whilst earning the condemnation of the board and administration of the club.
You are a pissant supporter the club could do without.
And so can I. Foe list for you, your replies will not be read.
![]()
It's a move I've never once regretted.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by johntheclaret » Thu Apr 17, 2014 3:15 am
whufc wrote:Will be definatly heading to the clubrooms saturday, not sure if ill head out to the ground yet but having spoke to some Dogs players last Saturday they really want all supporters to get behind them.
F**k knows what to do
by whufc » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:16 pm
by Wedgie » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Jase » Thu Apr 17, 2014 6:44 pm
by whufc » Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:54 pm
by bulldog2004 » Thu Apr 17, 2014 8:04 pm
whufc wrote:Crows have a fair few good ins this week
by sjt » Thu Apr 17, 2014 10:42 pm
by Ecky » Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:20 am
bulldog2004 wrote:whufc wrote:Crows have a fair few good ins this week
Gotta take 3 or 4 players out of that team to play sunday
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by Grahaml » Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:40 pm
by Ecky » Fri Apr 18, 2014 2:08 pm
John Olsen, June 2012 wrote:"Reserves teams in the SANFL for the two AFL clubs is not negotiable.
We will not compromise the SANFL competition (with AFL reserves teams)."
by kickinit » Fri Apr 18, 2014 8:34 pm
Ecky wrote:Grahaml,
Nobody expects the Crows to compromise their #1 side for their #2 side, but the Crows were admitted to the SANFL because they promised to be much more than just a reserves side:
- attract an extra 4000+ spectators per game
- always play to win
- help the SANFL clubs promote the games and the League
- generate extra TV revenue
etc...
Of course we were all very sceptical about this, but the club presidents who voted yes truly believed them. (I told Chiggy he was being gullible to his face after the "information meeting" at Glenelg but he disagreed). So it is in the Crows best interests to do their best to fulfil their promises, or the SANFL may decide to kick them out of the League at the end of this season (yes, this is possible).
by UK Fan » Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:07 pm
kickinit wrote:Ecky wrote:Grahaml,
Nobody expects the Crows to compromise their #1 side for their #2 side, but the Crows were admitted to the SANFL because they promised to be much more than just a reserves side:
- attract an extra 4000+ spectators per game
- always play to win
- help the SANFL clubs promote the games and the League
- generate extra TV revenue
etc...
Of course we were all very sceptical about this, but the club presidents who voted yes truly believed them. (I told Chiggy he was being gullible to his face after the "information meeting" at Glenelg but he disagreed). So it is in the Crows best interests to do their best to fulfil their promises, or the SANFL may decide to kick them out of the League at the end of this season (yes, this is possible).
It just goes to show how poorly the SANFL is being run. All of these promises should of been in writing, anyone with any business sense would of done so.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by cennals05 » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:21 pm
by sjt » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:29 pm
cennals05 wrote:This is the first game I won't be attending when I don't have another commitment for years. I'm not sure if my stubbornness is good or bad. I feel like I am letting my team down, especially when they voted no. But on the other hand I don't want to be seen as supporting the AFL in the SANFL. To go, or not to go, that is the question?
by Jim05 » Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:30 pm
cennals05 wrote:This is the first game I won't be attending when I don't have another commitment for years. I'm not sure if my stubbornness is good or bad. I feel like I am letting my team down, especially when they voted no. But on the other hand I don't want to be seen as supporting the AFL in the SANFL. To go, or not to go, that is the question?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |