Bombers4EVA wrote:Ted E Bear wrote:Jenkins or Johnson. Who should crows play and why?
Jenkins. Because you know he puts in more 2nd efforts than Johnson.
Johnston is a better player, Jenkins has to be in the side to give sauce a break
by Footy Smart » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:12 pm
Bombers4EVA wrote:Ted E Bear wrote:Jenkins or Johnson. Who should crows play and why?
Jenkins. Because you know he puts in more 2nd efforts than Johnson.
by Booney » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:14 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:Jenkins or Johnson. Who should crows play and why?
by bennymacca » Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:46 pm
Ted E Bear wrote:Johnson uses the ball a lot better and is more versatile
by cracka » Mon Apr 07, 2014 6:05 pm
by Lethal Dose » Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:27 pm
by bennymacca » Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:39 pm
Lethal Dose wrote:you can't drop pods, was our best forward last week. johnson needs to work on his defensive side, just like tex had too a few years back. jenkins needs time, but really has to work on his kicking for goal, was poor on saturday. hopefully they begin to gel soon the entire side, and really give it to the sainters and get the season back on track.
by bennymacca » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:06 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:16 pm
by bennymacca » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:20 pm
by Jim05 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:28 pm
bennymacca wrote:Lol jim you are possibly the grumpiest old dick ever. Of course st Kilda aren't flash but the crows still played well. And everyone thought it was a 50-50 game.
by Fricky » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:35 pm
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Lol jim you are possibly the grumpiest old dick ever. Of course st Kilda aren't flash but the crows still played well. And everyone thought it was a 50-50 game.
Of course they played well and I dont know many who thought it was 50/50. I hate the pricks and thought it would be a 8 goal minimum win to you. I get pissed off at the biased media in this state who seem to think the Cows are the greatest team in the world and all their losses are due to injuries, bad luck or cheating Victorian umpires, not the fact their list is average apart from 1 or 2 guns
by carey » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:41 pm
Suri wrote:Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Lol jim you are possibly the grumpiest old dick ever. Of course st Kilda aren't flash but the crows still played well. And everyone thought it was a 50-50 game.
Of course they played well and I dont know many who thought it was 50/50. I hate the pricks and thought it would be a 8 goal minimum win to you. I get pissed off at the biased media in this state who seem to think the Cows are the greatest team in the world and all their losses are due to injuries, bad luck or cheating Victorian umpires, not the fact their list is average apart from 1 or 2 guns
I've heard the Tiser is run by a one eyed crows fan, who hates port, and the articles reflect this. Im not a fan of the media in this state. The Age is a better read.
On to the game - I'm one who thought it was a 50\50 game. Crows have had small patches of good footy and a lot more patches of pathetic footy, while the saints have looked like a much more improved side. Good to see the lads play 4 quaters and actually dispose of the ball well. Hopefully this form can flow into the next few round's
by westcoastpanther » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:42 pm
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Lol jim you are possibly the grumpiest old dick ever. Of course st Kilda aren't flash but the crows still played well. And everyone thought it was a 50-50 game.
Of course they played well and I dont know many who thought it was 50/50. I hate the pricks and thought it would be a 8 goal minimum win to you. I get pissed off at the biased media in this state who seem to think the Cows are the greatest team in the world and all their losses are due to injuries, bad luck or cheating Victorian umpires, not the fact their list is average apart from 1 or 2 guns
by bennymacca » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:44 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:47 pm
bennymacca wrote:Lol jim you are possibly the grumpiest old dick ever. Of course st Kilda aren't flash but the crows still played well. And everyone thought it was a 50-50 game.
by carey » Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:47 pm
bennymacca wrote:Don't really agree with crows bias in the tiser - their chief football writer is a huge port man.
Contrary to what idiots like jim think I haven't seen anyone rate the crows that highly. Bottom half of the eight if we play well has always been the best case scenario
Jenkins played really well today, forward line looked much better with him giving a contest and betts and pods also looked dangerous
by Jim05 » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:02 pm
bennymacca wrote:Don't really agree with crows bias in the tiser - their chief football writer is a huge port man.
Contrary to what idiots like jim think I haven't seen anyone rate the crows that highly. Bottom half of the eight if we play well has always been the best case scenario
Jenkins played really well today, forward line looked much better with him giving a contest and betts and pods also looked dangerous
by carey » Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:04 pm
by cracka » Sun Apr 13, 2014 9:16 pm
Jim05 wrote:bennymacca wrote:Don't really agree with crows bias in the tiser - their chief football writer is a huge port man.
Contrary to what idiots like jim think I haven't seen anyone rate the crows that highly. Bottom half of the eight if we play well has always been the best case scenario
Jenkins played really well today, forward line looked much better with him giving a contest and betts and pods also looked dangerous
Most people had the Cows in the top 8 at start of season, with their list they are a 9-12th placed side at best.
Makes me laugh when the idiots on 5aa still think their list is better than Port's
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |